https://old.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1j6ffet/comment/mgo76ls/?context=8

i feel like https://old.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1j6ffet/comment/mgojde6/?context=8

literally, https://old.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1j6ffet/comment/mgo96a8/?context=8

but go off i guess

https://old.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1j6ffet/comment/mgo6i92/?context=8

https://old.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1j6ffet/comment/mgp2k6z/?context=8 and its EVERYTHING

https://old.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1j6ffet/comment/mgoewfh/?context=8

And it goes on and on

These are the people running your government !burgers how does it feel??? *sips tea*

Who you smash?

TikTok Ching Chong - 64 votes

AOC - 50 votes

Lauren Underwood - 5 votes

Katherine Clark - 9 votes

Judy Chu - 7 votes

Jasmine Crockett - 39 votes

Susie Lee - 6 votes

!fellas !nonchuds !chuds !g*mers @Maximus @peepeehands

Check out this brilliant leftoid strategy you guys

BREAKING: President Trump just signed a Proclamation declaring March as ‘Irish Heritage Month’.

Irish-Americans voted for Trump in very large numbers in November.

This is awesome. Let’s hope the Irish people vote for a REAL Patriot soon, like Americans did in November! 🇺🇸🇮🇪 pic.twitter.com/n9kboDvI5C

— Cillian (@CilComLFC) March 6, 2025

I think you've missed the point of populism. Democrats keep trying to fight MAGA sentiment with concrete and sensible policy (not to say I agree with their policy, but at least they try to base it on data and established theory more or less). But that leaves them open to discussion critique, negotiation and compromises. You know, messy stuff. Populism works by appealing directly to gut instinct, confirmation bias, and pithy but largely empty slogans.

What the Democrats need is someone who can be a populist in addition to having solid policy proposals. And to stop sabotaging those people in the primaries.

heres how bernie can still win

When you're threatening to invade Mexico, Canada and Greenland while arming Israel for genocide and threatening to collapse the Iranian economy, you're still the Party of Foreign Intervention. Edit: forgot Panama, threatening to invade Panama. And to conquer Gaza after the ethnic cleansing.

None of this drivel explains how democrats will win in 2026 and 2028.

Ultimately there is nothing the Democrats can do to MAKE the voters listen to them. Ultimately the voters have to choose they care more about equitable economic relationships more then they care about trans kids and what bathroom they use. ...

dear subhuman filth

... The parties don't fight over who is right and wrong, the parties fight over what the problems are. Democrats: lack of quality healthcare, cost of housing, low min wages, etc. and Republicans - Abortions, Immigrants, the factual existence of queer people, and the lack of prayer in school.

Read a tweet that said Dems are the party of hall monitors and HR associates. We need an butthole. Someone that isn't afraid of making bad headlines, says NAUGHTY WORDS! Someone that can say on national TV that Trump is a dumbass for prying America from Europe, imply that Putn and Trump are in a gay relationship. Come off kinda bad at first but kinda unique.

A relationship would be too much respect, sexual references maybe, but nothing that suggests emotion on Putin's side.

"And now our allies are being crapped on by a man who'd suck Putin's peepee for a nickel, as though Putin would charge that little."

We need Rahm Emanuel, but newer. Maybe get Ari Gold from Entourage. Al Franken probably would have good, we need someone who is "un-polished" (Irl they're actually super polished but they're pretending not to be) and speaks "off the cuff".

When I watched Dems bring those signs in, I really thought we finally became the party of overly sensitive college students who protested speakers by snapping their fingers. It gave me "SF city council approves gaza ceasefire vote" vibes for some reason, in terms of just cringe and pointlessness.

>finally

Maybe Kulinski? Has some banger tweets

That's considered a banger? That's just a mindless juvenile comment a preteen would make. I don't think Dems running candidates with the same flaws as the GOP is the win you think it is. If a shitty juvenile unqualified Dem wins, we're still stuck with a shitty juvenile unqualified president.

"Same flaws" except they win, support Ukraine, and treat trans people like they're human

I've been through this before - perhaps you win an election, but there may not be anything left of the party when you do.

>implying that the Democratic Party as it stands is worth saving

Don't these same people complain all the time about how ineffective Dems are at doing anything? What the frick would be lost by torching it all?

There's also a funny irony in all these commenters talking about what a Dem version of Trump would be like while overlooking the fact that part of Trump's takeover was a full repudiation of the values the party had been leaning toward when they were dealt humiliating defeats by that uppity I mean upstart Obama. A pretty obvious parallel would be Blue Trump going on a proper purge of all the intersectional garbage causes coming out of social media and the Ivy League but as posts like this suggest:

"Same flaws" except they win, support Ukraine, and treat trans people like they're human

that'll never happen because these people literally worship that shit.

When thinking of who on the liberal side could even work as their model of an anti-Trump (so someone who's both cutting in a funny way and an actual butthole) the only person I can think of is Bill Maher and, again, he's a non-starter because of his bickering with the trans-mutationals. If we are sticking to Blue Trump as the ideal candidate then being a TV personality is obviously non-negotiable. It already has some traction amongst liberals based on how many people to this day will say that Jon Stewart should run for President. But even though he's good at being cutting, Jon Leibowitz doesn't strike me as unhinged enough to imply that Megyn Kelly is acting up because she's on her period . All the other TV people are at best the very epitome of soy impotent rage.

Making jokes without bullying is hard!

Okay but why? Is this really worthy of this subreddit?

The real question

And wouldn't it be helpful to include his whole name in the title if you want it to come up in searches?

Remember, mocking people for their appearance is wrong, unless we don't like that person. Then it's a good thing.

I don't even think that's how Google works

This karma farming shit doesn't even work unless you've uploaded the image to Imgur...

Yeah that'll show him, just like the 20+ other times this gets posted. Christ we're so fricked

I've seen this pic with this caption posted multiple times. Do y'all actually think you're doing community service or making a change in the world posting this pic or just farming karma?

Honestly this sub is just free karma farming lol

That's funny he looks like the average reddit political poster without a beard. I'm talking both sides before someone thinks I'm with them.

Yeah it's very ironic, Vance looks like the average Redditor

Dumb post, this never works anytime anybody ever tries it

It would be really funny if Reddit ever did what did to userscores on Kiwi Farms and made karma essentially worthless. I bet site activity would tank hard if there was no point to karma farming anymore.

!islam !christians !britbongs !burgers

Don't tell /r/somethingiswrong2024 they might have a stroke

I must be nice and not mean.

The npcs can't comprehend