Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Maybe I'm:marseybrainlet:, but I don't get it?

Why is ol' Benny cutting a map of the Gaza Strip out of himself? Doesn't he think it's actually Israeli land?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's supposedly a reference to Shylock from The Merchant of Venice but I'm too :marseybrainlet: to get it.

I'll just believe whatever the poll tells me, wisdom of crowds etc.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Shylock is a Jew who lends money to his Christian rival Antonio, setting the security at a pound of Antonio's flesh. When a bankrupt Antonio defaults on the loan, Shylock demands the pound of flesh. This decision is fuelled by his sense of revenge, for Antonio had previously insulted, physically assaulted and spat on him in the Rialto (stock exchange of Venice) dozens of times, defiled the "sacred" Jewish religion and had also inflicted massive financial losses on him. Meanwhile, Shylock's daughter, Jessica, falls in love with Antonio's friend Lorenzo and converts to Christianity, leaves Shylock's house and steals vast riches from him, which add to Shylock's rage and harden his resolve for revenge. In the end – due to the efforts of Antonio's well-wisher, Portia – Shylock is charged with attempted murder of a Christian, carrying a possible death penalty, and Antonio is freed without punishment. Shylock is then ordered to surrender half of his wealth and property to the state and the other half to Antonio. However, as an act of "mercy", Antonio modifies the verdict, asking Shylock to hand over only one-half of his wealth – to him (Antonio) for his own as well as Lorenzo's need – provided that he keeps two promises. First, Shylock has to sign an agreement bequeathing all his remaining property to Lorenzo and Jessica, which is to become effective after his demise, and second, he is to immediately convert to Christianity. Shylock is forced to agree to these terms, and he exits citing illness.

Looks like Shylock gets fricked over. I still don't get it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Shylock did nothing wrong

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

is it just me or is Shylock completely justified? Wish he carved that white boy up.

Alas, he couldn't beat the ultimate cuckoldry:marseypipe:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People aren't too sure what to make of Shylock in the play, Shakespeare gives him a lot of reasons for his evil actions but he is also a cartoonishly evil jewish banker

:marseyshakespeare:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sounds like shakespear is not just a queer black muslim woman of size, but also a based anti-semite (good kind)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Artists have always been totally ignorant of economics, it's why they're all commies. Good old spear boy probably thought lending money and expecting it back was itself evil.


:#marseytwerking:

:marseycoin::marseycoin::marseycoin:
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think it was more the christian/abrahamic ethos, even to this day many muslims won't get loans because they are unislamic.

Early modern England was very religious

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Econmisia is the most evil remnant of ancient religions.


:#marseytwerking:

:marseycoin::marseycoin::marseycoin:
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The only Shylock interpretation I can think of is this is Netanyahu attempting to get his pound of flesh as revenge but that it will actually end up being an act of self harm. Even that is a bit of a stretch though because Shylock already gets his comeuppance in the original story so there would be no need to change it to the pound coming from the Jew himself

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The actual moral of the story is to not do business with Italians

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the actual moral is to read better books

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This decision is fuelled by his sense of revenge, for Antonio had previously insulted, physically assaulted and spat on him in the Rialto (stock exchange of Venice) dozens of times, defiled the "sacred" Jewish religion and had also inflicted massive financial losses on him.

I don't remember this

This is anti-Antonio propaganda :marseymad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

DIE PORTIASHILL

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

NEVER!

:!marseypunching:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh that much I understand. I think. But isn't the "pound of flesh" supposed to signify a loss?

Netanyahu hasn't lost (yet) and he's actively trying to gain control of the land he's cutting out of himself in the cartoon, not get rid of it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But Shylock wants Antonio's flesh so that doesn't make sense for this to be a reference. I think Bell's probably anti-Semitic like Corbyn but this particular comic isn't.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

although there were no practising Jews who lived in England during Shakespeare's time. Jews were expelled from the country in 1290 by Edward I in the Edict of Expulsion; this was not reversed until the Cromwell Era

Heh didn't know that

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Expulsion

Sounds like the Jewish policies at the time in UK and nature of the job Jews got pushed into and naturally excel at seems to have been where all the main Jewish insults come from

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think the boxing gloves and scalpel are meant to represent Netanyahu trying to conduct a precise operation against Hamas but will inevitably cause damage to the surrounding Israelis and Palestinians

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

OK that makes sense. But in that interpretation though, he's not cutting himself so the Shylock reference doesn't make sense and as a consequence, the anti-semitism charge doesn't either.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I personally don't think he's attempting to reference the Merchant of Venice here but people seem to have stopped giving him the benefit of doubt anymore after his reaction to the whole Labour antisemitism scandal

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't get it either, but all political cartoons are terrible. No wonder Garrison slathers his with labels.

Is this cartoon saying that Binny's going to injure himself trying to cut off Gaza ?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.