Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

modligarchs allow shit like this then proceed to remove my rdrama screenshot submission post cause i "don't seem like a true christian" :#cryingatcuteness: !christians !besties

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Don't feel bad /r/Christianity is a containment sub run by atheists. I would not trust any takes on their to represent popular views amoung actual Christians.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

/r/AcademicBiblical is good for some research but you'd be absolutely clueless trying to understand the beliefs of the majority of Christ followers by reading it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well yeah it's about examining the Bibble as a historical document and not necessarily as a religious text.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1728611539221579.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Fair, I guess it's unfair to judge them as though they should be giving the contemporary view.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because the "contemporary view" (I assume you mean contemporary Christian view) depends on what of the ten billion sects of Christianity you belong to. So if you ask a question like "What happened to Enoch?" you're going to get thirty different answers depending on what Bible they consider correct (Ecclesiasticus spells out the theological answer to this question but isn't in Prot bibles), how literally they take the Bible, etc.

There's a similar stack exchange forum called Biblical hermeneutics and it's useless because everybody just gives you their denomination's POV.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1728611539221579.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

im talking about stuff like "who wrote X book"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.