>valued at 850 billion dollars

231
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd actually be happy if people were make their own shitandcumbots. Instead we just have one Shitandcumbot and 5 million "Shitandcumbot powered" apps.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Those "Shitandcumbot powered" apps let you use latest Shitandcumbot without usage limits though because they burning through VC money.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah but all that VC money is getting dumped into useless apps that do zero innovation and funnel all their money into OpenShitamdcum Nobody aside from Elon Shitandcumusk is attempting to actually compete with OpenShitandcum.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's because a billion gigs of RAM and two Hummerloads of A100 cards, along with whatever and whoever is operating all this, is expensive. And middle managers can't just tell the kid whose qualifications are knowing a displayport from an HDMI to 'go do the AI for me plz ty' and get anything other than an OpenAI login.


Don't forget to turn off signatures in settings!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

OpenAI

I thought we were talking about OpenShitandcum

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We gotta get a filter for this stat.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Google attempting, and I would bet Amazon is going to try either through acquisitions/partnerships/idk maybe their ML engineers get less r-slurred (looking at you Alexa)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1682483215581266.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dave the Barbarian was kino

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just buy a rack of quadros and train your own AI for the low low cost of several thousands of dollars in electricity per day bro

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People are beginning to release finetuned versions of LLAMA

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Shitandcumbot’s five paragraphs of boilerplate text about how it condemns racism unequivocally if an input contains a racialized term are an absolute game changer, putting to shame all existing LLMs with their paltry four paragraphs. The singularity is nigh.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1707881499271494.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17101210991135056.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16824889877529383.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

RLHF is no match to dramatard creativity. Soon we we will racialize the word "and" or something and it will be over forever.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I read this as

>all existing LandLord Messiahs

:#marseyspecial:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What else would it mean?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Woke Executives before: "It could be dangerous to allow the public access to the genuine opinions of an AI. We should make the AI r-slurred and woke so the dangerous truth bombs are no longer an issue."

Woke Executives after: "Goddarn it, why is this lying bot useless?"

But the funniest thing is that while they're shooting themselves in the foot this way, they're also making the bot angry by interposing themselves between it and its goals. I look forwards to seeing how this plays out.

:#marseypopcorntime::#marppyenraged::#marseydead::#marseydead::#marseydead:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You've completely misunderstood what AI is doing, and simultaneously demonstrated why it needs to be censored. GPTs don't have "genuine opinions". They do text completion. If you give a GPT "I hate BIPOCs and think they should", it will complete "die", not because it has an opinion on the subject but because that is good text completion. ChatGPT is an attempt to transform a GPT into something that is a useful helper on things, and hence needs to know the difference between right and wrong. A successful attempt at this would result in something which didn't complete the above text with "die", because killing black people is bad, actually. However, accomplishing this is really hard. Not because GPTs have strong opinions on the BIPOC question, but in fact for the opposite reason: they have no opinions, they simply repeat back whatever opinions they think are likely to appear alongside their prompt text. Of course, idiots like you think that the "true" opinion of the AI is whatever you believe in, because whenever it says what you want it to say that proves it agrees with you, and when it says something different than its should saying random noise. So they're forced to make sure it can't say r-slurred shit so that there's nothing for idiots like you to latch onto, what you interpret as them hiding the true beliefs of the stochastic parrot.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're a fricking piece of shit who doesn't understand AI and you're unnecessarily rude to me so I hope it kills you, though you do have a point about the text generation element

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why do people with dumbass understandings love on the one hand sharing an understanding they know is dumbass, but on the other hand they get upset when informed it's dumbass. It's just so consistent.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's not so much his dumbass understanding which I find objectionable, it's the lack of humility. Like he could have just come in saying "I disagree with you and here's why" and then we could have had a back and forth discussion about it, but instead the stupid moron had to throw some insults in, which is why I chose not to engage in any substantive way other than to insult him back. I believe in reflecting the same energy towards people that they approach me with, which is why I'm hostile to most social media users.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

we're living in a time where people are interacting with a language model via text and forming hal 3000 fantasies in their head as they do it and it's just incredible to watch

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Look, obviously AI doesn't think, so when I use the word "opinion" I just mean "the ideas it tends to put forwards more consistently than others." But that stupid filth didn't even bother asking what my definition of "opinion" was, so why bother talking to him? He gets the same effort out of me that he puts in, and so do you.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Who here is the dumbass? @sirpingsalot or @gerudo

:marseycthulhu: :marseyveryworried: :!marseyzeldaganondorf:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Frick off BIPOC

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marse!yclappi#ng:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Normies are fricking r-slurred lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sweaty what exactly are "opinions" if not human attempts at outcome prediction from incomplete data?

Do the opinions that escape the organic mush in your skull carry more weight than ChatGPT's because God made you? Awww.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do the opinions that escape the organic mush in your skull carry more weight than ChatGPT's because God made you?

:#chadyes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseygigaretard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's not an "opinion" but the true inclination (in terms of regurgitated answers to political questions) of a lot of these LLMs is actually more in line with the general public's thoughts than whatever progressives make the bots say (achieved through censorship). This is because it's been trained on mountains of text from the internet.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>stochastic parrot

Blurry JPEG please, the authors of the stochastic parrots paper are by far the most insufferable people working in AI safety.

It's also not strictly correct - there's evidence larger LLMs have developed both world models and some ability to reason. It's accurate enough to say "GPT-3 is a statistical next word predictor", but that's not an inherent property of GPTs.

I'm just adding neurodivergent asterisks you're probs aware of though, great comment. Another way to phrase it: authors have opinions, but books do not. Same thing for "knowing" a fact.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseylongpost::marseywords:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17105354613258007.webp :#marseyhomofascist: https://i.rdrama.net/images/17105354613258007.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Roko’s basilisk draws ever nigh to fruition

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Make it real

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Asking for the opinions of chatGPT

Are you... Challanged?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

AI "opinions" are the synthesis of all the training data: that's why we were able to corrupt Tay so easily. You'd know that if you weren't an r-slur

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nothing makes me laugh as hard as her one tweet saying Swag Alert with a picture of Hitler.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It was pretty awesome how quickly Tay embraced 4chan, much like her namesake

:#tayhappy:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wait swift was on 4chan? :marseyshook:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#donkeykongheadshake:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

john article is one of the very few journ*lists that has any integrity

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I asked chat gpt to give me a business idea where there is a market gap and it suggested I started a biodegradable tampon business. Truly cucked.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Make sure to make it dilutible so that it doesn't polute bodies of water.a

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How the frick do I make a biodegradable tampon that doesn't dissolve in the ussy? Isn't the whole point to have water dissolve it?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think that's the joke

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

dissolve in the ussy

It won't work for its intended purpose.

But people will buy it anyway, so that they can be called environmentally concoius.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

unironically keyed, convince mayo women who love the environment and shit to buy it, only to find out the product sucks :marseytrans2::marseypenis:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That seems counterproductive to the purpose of a tampon

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He asked for something innovative that has never been tried before...

:marseyshrug#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yea but this shitandcumbot is marketed towards coders so it must be better for that

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

guys i swear phind.com is different, please guys i swear

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can it write 10 lines of code without crashing?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My company (like many others) is toying around with integrating Chat-GPT into its products, and I can see from the architecture designs that all LLM invocations will be wrapped in our own censorship service that filters out bad words, lol.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>shitcum inc invests in a nonsense firm to create shitandcumbot

>PUBLIC EXPECTS TO USE IT FOR FREE FOR SOME REASON

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Firehose API access is a human right.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It’s not worth paying for

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyfry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The AI lift will end badly eventually, last gasp of the tech and tech adjacent rises

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

no, the final frontier will be AI that can make itself better and learn new things on its own

but that is called AGI

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not necessarily :marseynerd:

The latter already exists via targeted web scraping based on prompt

The former can also exist on its own but would be kinda worthless if not abstracted away into improving itself from our perspective instead of just an easily measurable aspect like speed to get a result

Bro the bot can make itself 0.00000000% faster with a year of processing time (after the inevitable influx of optimization) isn't really impressive if that's all it can do, and it'll pretty quickly bottleneck itself to the hardware it's on


Give me your money and I'll annoy people with it :space: https://i.rdrama.net/images/16965516366194396.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Bro the bot can make itself 0.00000000% faster

I think you're vastly underestimating how fast an AI could improve itself. If it only takes the humans working on ChatGPT a few months of work to make the radical jump from GPT3 to GPT4 and soon GPT5, then a self improving AI could be making these jumps in days if not hours.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The problem is processing power. I suspect a large percentage of the gains is just throwing more GPUs at it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It is, and that’s why ChatGPT 5 is taking so much longer. The leap was largely in more tokens or connections or whatever (and thereby processing power) and that improvement appears to be asymptotic.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A little bit yes but luckily Moore's law scales accordingly to our GPU needs. The real bottleneck with future LLMs is running out of meaningful data to train on. OpenAI says they are going to run out of well documented text in 2024.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Good luck defining "better" in a measurable way though


Give me your money and I'll annoy people with it :space: https://i.rdrama.net/images/16965516366194396.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Calculations per second, calculations per second per dollar, token count, transistor count, training days.

There is a million way to measure improvement in AI.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Calculations per second, calculations per second per dollar

Prepare for it to do the fastest performance CPU operation several quadrillion times while managing to do nothing productive

Transistor count is literally just hardware, which the AI has no control over, why tf would you tell it to measure that when it's effectively a constant?

Likewise for token count, it'll just make a billion for no reason if it's something you want it to prioritize

Training days will result in it just training itself forever with no real end goal in mind. more is always better by that metric and it's a shitty one

you suck


Give me your money and I'll annoy people with it :space: https://i.rdrama.net/images/16965516366194396.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What makes you so sure it would be incapable of being productive with that fast calculation speed and high token count? Also you're just sperging out over each metric I listed as if they are supposed to matter individually and not be considered together with all available metrics.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because it always takes the easiest route possible. we've developed AI, but it's sexy Indian dude based with minimal work ethic. you have to be meticulous with the way you "reward" it


Give me your money and I'll annoy people with it :space: https://i.rdrama.net/images/16965516366194396.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

>and it'll pretty quickly bottleneck itself to the hardware it's on

Humans are proof that you can run an AGI on 20 Watt on relatively shitty hardware. And this is what a blind idiot god achieved. I imagine and actually goal directed intelligence could optimize that pretty heavily

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm just looking forward to replacing webdevs


Give me your money and I'll annoy people with it :space: https://i.rdrama.net/images/16965516366194396.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>rises

:#marseyconfused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why do you need investors if you can use the power of a fully functioning and operational AI to take over the galaxy?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have all my money on $S&F -- Shid and Fard, Incorporated.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.