Unable to load image

Wikipedians fail again to prove their editors are not extremely neurodivergent after one user edits 90,000 uses of the phrase "comprise of" and :marseylongpost: posts about it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Giraffedata/comprised_of

orange site discus

Being 💯 honest I am not reading the essay post at all.

I thought calling people internet Jannies was our thing :marseycatgirljanny:

Wow, there’s a lot of unjustified negativity in this thread. The whole encyclopedia (and a whole bunch of the wider world of computing) is built out of this kind of hyper-focused nerding over details.

These changes don’t make your day worse. He’s not shoving it in our faces or claiming it’s going to save the world. We don’t know what’s going on in this editor’s life or what he “should” be doing with his time instead. Maybe simple routine work is his way of unwinding from the maddening pace and complexity of the rest of life. Good on him for feeling passionate about something and seeing it through.

We should be grateful there are people willing to do this kind of mundane janitorial work.

I wouldn't call this janitorial work. This seems to me to be less like someone cleaning a building than someone replacing every pencil in the building with a #2 pencil, because they believe that type of pencil is the correct type of pencil to use...


" He’s not shoving it in our faces"

But he is?


This definitely falls deep into the pedantry zone. Lots of modern English uſage was once wrong and has become normalized. The language doeſn't have an Académie calling the ſhots. It inevitably evolves, warts and all.

No one seems to understand Wikipedia operates as a system of lords and serfs, where a powerful few pull this crap all the time.

Most relevant example I can think of is when Mac OS X was renamed and stylized to "macOS" someone went and systematically did a find and replace all instances of "OS X" to macOS even in situations where it made absolutely no sense as the article was explicitly talking about prior versions. It was like rewriting history in real time.

Imagine if someone went into a library and started editing history books with a Sharpie to reflect future events.

Hmm, now that is an idea! :marseynotes: to self: Make sure every book refers to "Donald Trump" as Donald "Hitler Jr." Drumf.


That whole page is comprised of the most pedantic arguments for what amounts to policing an evolving language

Gatekeeping language is the same tactic racists have about BIPOCS slang. Wikipedia wouldn't be :marseyracist:, would they?


Pedantic, perhaps, but within the purview of an editor of an encyclopedia enforcing a style guideline!

Except there is no such thing. To quote.

"Wikipedia does not have a policy or guideline on whether "comprised of" is welcome in the encyclopedia."

This is nothing less but one person trying to punch way above their weight in shaping the English language.

Another case of one lone autist one a crusade to change the most popular language in the word! The reason? He just feels like it brah. Also :marseypunching:

:#marseymanysuchcases:

Some personal notes:

Wikipedia is feeling more and more neurodivergent than normal. This reminds me of this thread Furryfox Users are upset at Wikipedia, claim Furryfoxemsia when their Version History page gets set for deletion where one lone autist decided to get rid of every "Version History" page for software and replace it with "Release History."

I for one look forward to more cases of complete childish behaviors on one of the most used and cited sources in the world!

57
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What's wrong with "comprised of" seems like good english to me. Please explain in rdrama terms.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyautistattentionseeker:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wiki janny is sneeding.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think it’s supposed to be comprises. Comprised of doesn’t sound wrong and is similar to the commonly used composed of but is technically redundant.

I perused a grammar book at a Barnes and nobles the other day :marseybigbrain:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It still is comprises. That people don't know how to use a word doesn't mean we should just accept wrong use. Comprised of only doesn't sound wrong because you are a frickin ignoramus!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You need to use 'comprise' in the same way you use 'include'. 'Comprise' is the same as 'include' except you need to 'include' everything.

E.g. The United States includes Hawaii and Alaska

E.g. The United States comprises 50 states, a federal district, five major unincorporated territories, nine Minor Outlying Islands, and 326 Indian reservations.

So when you hear someone say "The US is comprised of 50 states (...)" it's like they're saying "The US is included of Hawaii and Alaska".

The autist doing these 90,000 edits is doing God's work. And if anyone wants to say "dictionaries are descriptive not prescriptive" I have one Marsey for you:

:#marseyropeyourself:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseysneed:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ur gay and ur English is bad

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

90% of people are under the impression Wikipedia is an encyclopedia edited by experts, when it's actually an outlet for people with actual serious obsessive compulsive disorder

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

English uſage was once wrong and has become normalized. The language doeſn't have an Académie calling the ſhots. It inevitably evolves, warts and all.

ſomething ſeems off.....

:marseyhmm:

"Comprise of" is too janky, and it's got nothing on "consists of." Also not sure why he'd use that when a plural noun is the subject

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Except that nobody cares because most of us have s*x on a regular basis lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What people think are "f" is really a stylized "s" but the r-slurs are too r-slurred to know this, and dunk on old dead white people who could write well.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Autism sama :#marseykneel:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I honestly can't believe I let them sucker me into giving them $5

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Best_known_for_IP

Someone has to do something about wikipedia's weasel words

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I am sorry that happened to you Snappy

:@snappypat:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.