Here is /r/firefox sneeding about it https://old.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/1czpzs3/a_bad_infographic_comparing_various_browsers_from/
Edit: forgot to add the source:
There are many things one could note, but just for starters:
- Firefox does include anti-fingerprinting. We could say much about this, but at the very least it's there.
- Telemetry is not inherently bad, especially when you can turn it off(as is the case with Firefox). Moreover, Firefox is open source, so you can verify that what telemetry gets collected. "Type + num. of connections" is just a ridiculous metric.
- Firefox is certainly the most tweakable with perhaps Vivaldi having an edge if we exclude userCSS, but that's debatable.
- Ease of use is another ridiculous metric, that you'd expect Firefox to win. People of all ages use it.
People seem to just read the marketing on each browser's website and take them at face value.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Does safari count as a 4th? It's not on the list.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Mullvad is Tor browser, and Tor does actual development besides UI recolors. It's not an independent browser, but there's some browser dev happening
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context