Here is /r/firefox sneeding about it https://old.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/1czpzs3/a_bad_infographic_comparing_various_browsers_from/
Edit: forgot to add the source:
There are many things one could note, but just for starters:
- Firefox does include anti-fingerprinting. We could say much about this, but at the very least it's there.
- Telemetry is not inherently bad, especially when you can turn it off(as is the case with Firefox). Moreover, Firefox is open source, so you can verify that what telemetry gets collected. "Type + num. of connections" is just a ridiculous metric.
- Firefox is certainly the most tweakable with perhaps Vivaldi having an edge if we exclude userCSS, but that's debatable.
- Ease of use is another ridiculous metric, that you'd expect Firefox to win. People of all ages use it.
People seem to just read the marketing on each browser's website and take them at face value.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How is this even a category, this is absolutely redundant because my 90 year old demented grandma who hasn't touched computers since 90s could install an adblocker. It's not a real category and shouldn't be taken into account.
What should be however is the source browser, which for a lot of these is chromium. This is the biggest of all red flags and nothing that is based off chromium should ever be used in a white man's house, ever.
Based on these more accurate metrics, firefox is absolutely viable
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context