BushWasRightfree/dom
There's no ideology but liberal democracy and Fukuyama is its prophet
1yr ago#3725213
spent 0 currency on pings
Shovels bit come from some POV saying they were forced to assult without ammo when they run out, or they weren't supplied with enough ammo to begin with. Different waves were supplied differently.
BushWasRightfree/dom
There's no ideology but liberal democracy and Fukuyama is its prophet
6-9 1yr ago#3725239
spent 0 currency on pings
Yeah probably. That's why you have to take every information about an ongoing war with a grain of .
Can't wait to read about this war in a few years when hohols and glowies will be allowed to be a bit more honest about r-slurations on their side, right now we can only see those on snowBIPOC side.
This is the only quote in the article that explains the headline.
The ministry added that the increased close-quarter fighting was probably due to a continued focus from Russia's military on deploying soldiers on foot due to a lack of artillery ammunition.
So this is one claim about why they were focused on infantry tactics, not a claim that anyone was fighting unarmed. If there was some source to anyone fighting without access to guns (let alone actual evidence), it's definitely not in the article.
Note that the smug headline buries an entire article focused on Russian advances, the impending capture of a city, and officials' attempts to downplay the victory.
BushWasRightfree/dom
There's no ideology but liberal democracy and Fukuyama is its prophet
Pibbles 1yr ago#3725255
spent 0 currency on pings
was going to add "and NBC is probably trash" to that comment. Read WSJ's article about Wagnerites yearsterday, WSJ are some of few journos who get the bullet last.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Shovels bit come from some POV saying they were forced to assult without ammo when they run out, or they weren't supplied with enough ammo to begin with. Different waves were supplied differently.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If I was a POW in Ukrainian custody I'd say whatever they wanted me to say too, so they don't cut off my balls you know
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah probably. That's why you have to take every information about an ongoing war with a grain of .
Can't wait to read about this war in a few years when hohols and glowies will be allowed to be a bit more honest about r-slurations on their side, right now we can only see those on snowBIPOC side.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think this will be an interesting lesson in propaganda over the internet once it's all said and done.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah only a lesson about the propaganda feed to the Ruskis. Everything the west reads is factual and not propaganda at all.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is the only quote in the article that explains the headline.
So this is one claim about why they were focused on infantry tactics, not a claim that anyone was fighting unarmed. If there was some source to anyone fighting without access to guns (let alone actual evidence), it's definitely not in the article.
Note that the smug headline buries an entire article focused on Russian advances, the impending capture of a city, and officials' attempts to downplay the victory.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
was going to add "and NBC is probably trash" to that comment. Read WSJ's article about Wagnerites yearsterday, WSJ are some of few journos who get the bullet last.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Imagine losing a city to guys who ran out of ammo and started using shovels
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Pictured: actual combat footage
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context