https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/30/europe/turkey-vote-finland-nato-membership-intl/index.html
BAD LINK
HERE IS THE GOOD LINK: https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/03/30/europe/turkey-vote-finland-nato-membership-intl/index.html
This 13-months-and-counting-long invasion of Europeβs equivalent of Guatemala by what has been revealed to be Euro-Mexico just keeps getting better and better.
Not a single American boot on the ground
~2% of our annual military budget spent to send off and train on old surplus
Mighty Russian war machine exposed as malfunctioning old scrap
Powerful new buffer states against other impotent Eastern aggression
Euro-Guatemala still uncucked and killing Russians every day
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
NO YOU DON'T GET IT RUSSIA IS ACTUALLY WINNING AND THEY HAVEN'T EVEN REALLY BEEN TRYING OK GEEZ
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Even Pentagon admitted Russia hasnt significantly used any amount of
Navy
Air Force
Cyber attacks
It has primarily been a really stupid ground war but they'll get the shitty rubbles of the regions they wanted, resorting to the nuclear option if all else fails
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thank God their stockpile of cyber attack is still holding out.
Lmao, they knocked out most of the UKR power grid, let alone the internet. Doubt they can touch Starlink anyway. Are the Ruskies going to hack piles of rubble?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Rocket Daddy turned off Starlink for hohols
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
wait a second
they haven't used their navy in this land based ground war?! well that changes EVERYTHING!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They did, then their flagship mysteriously exploded
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It doesn't exist
Yes they have the 3000 Pixel Camo SU-57s of Putin. No it is not a Flanker in a fat bodykit. No you cannot see them
What do you mean Microsoft can just "turn off" my malware.exe wtf I installed Gentoo and Brave this can't be happening
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
"Russia is holding back, they are taking heavy loses for lulz, but they totally could win if they wanted" is my favorite cope.
Like, how does it even make sense? Does it mean that Putin is a CIA plant who wants to destroy the Russian army?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Lal Singh-maxxing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Based sneedcat replier
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I really like this argument because it still doesnβt change the fact that NATO just grew even more, existing members are beginning to pull their weight now, and thereβs an absolute frickload of lost Russians and Russian materiel.
Do not give a single frick about Ukraine itself and lol at the priceless series of geopolitical losses (OP) that its possible-annexation cost them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
watching russia get exposed as a barely functioning military after decades of
THE MIGHTY RUSSIAN ARMY IS A THREAT TO THE ENTIRE WORLD 
has been great.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There is a good paper that just came out on their failure:
https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/special-resources/preliminary-lessons-russias-unconventional-operations-during-russo-ukrainian-war-february-2022
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Us Leafs are never gonna pay our 2%
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context