Ukraine has always been able to carry out strikes on the territory of Russia because it does not contradict international law, said Bundestag member Norbert Retgen.
— S p r i n t e r F a m i l y (@SprinterFamily) June 6, 2024
" It has always been clear that, according to international law, Ukraine was allowed to defend itself against… pic.twitter.com/WGylkcsogd
There is no war in Ukraine by international laws, Ukraine never declared war to Russia so has no international right to shoot at Russia.
Why Russia is in Ukraine ? Russia is in Donbas because it recognised DPR and LPR so it helps pushing Ukrainian gov from this territory. This territory is now also Russian by its law and couple of international countries recognised it so now it's debatable. In Kharkiv Russian are now because they building buffer zone because khohols for no reason shooting at Russian territory that khohols recognise as Russian. Khohols didn't declared any special operation against Russia so they have no excuse to do this similar to that they have no excuse why Zelenskyy is still president in parliamentary country that protects only parliament during martial law and not president.
Thing is also when khohols shot at Crimea with western weapons the excuse is that west don't recognise Crimea as Russia. So the fact that those weapons using western intel and military satellites it's grey zone. But when those weapons are used on soil that west recognises as Russian that shot opens a lot of work cans. There is literally not law excuse for such acts in “international laws” that Redditors love that much this event can translated to west and Ukraine for lols randomly bomb Russian soil.
Russia is not written as enemy in shit that Ukraine is doing, their enemy is separatists.
So it hilarious that “international laws” is hold as some kind of bible
Only in west Europe (I think even only in Benelux) international law are above constitution. So to other countries that shit ain't even important. Yet Redditors are ready to kill for it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is r-slurred even for zigger cope. There's no legal mumbo jumbo you can possibly come up with to deny a country's right to retaliate against military action.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ukraine doesn't consider what's happening against them a military action from
Russia. You are free to prove me wrong if you show me a Ukrainian document when it stand they have a conflict with Russia.
If you can't then what you are saying is just bs. Ukraine also has martial law only till August 2024 because on 8 May Zelenskyy extended it again for 3 months and since on 20 May he lost his power he won't be able to do it again.
Ukraine first has to accept that there is military action against them and they don't do it.
Have u studied laws or just think you are smart ?
Also just remember how you wanted at me dunk when I told nothing will happen when Wagner did their little march you were so excited to prove me wrong
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!metashit come witness the new zigger cope and be astonished at the r-sluration
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Mad at me for carp comment ?
You have short memory ? I always told there no war “de jury”
https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2024/02/the-final-countdown-will-russia-and-ukraine-renew-gas-transit-deal?lang=en
Ukraine and Russia are trading with each other.
Like I can't remember single case in history where 2 countries openly at formally at war, were trading with each other at government level.
If you can give an example you'll stop being an rеtard so go prove me wrong
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
im not reading any of it but I support russia
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Hes not a zigger tho i thought he was indian?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Then why are they bombing Russia, gigga brain? Russia is invading and bombing them. That is military action that they are retaliating to. Of course they think they are in armed conflict with Russia. Where do you even come up with this shit?
I did prove you wrong. You thought Wagner was doing a 4D chess move and feinting treason to out maneuver Ukraine
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I just pointing at laws. Like do you know difference about positive laws and normal/natural laws ?
Ukraine has no explanation why they bombing Russian soil similar to why Zelenskyy is still acting like he is president.
US now also has no explanation why it targeting Russian soil that US recognise as Russian. US says it help Ukraine fight Russia but Ukraine ain't fighting Russia on paper and what US consider it doing it putting US into belligerents status since long range missiles can't be launched without direct targeting from U.S. intel bases but U.S. insist it ain't belligerents
So in positive laws there ain't any international law in this conflict
US randomly calls it war of aggression but Russia joined this conflict after DNR and LNR asked for help and those 2 states are recognised by multiple UN members.
Laws are all about interpretation but Ukraine did nothing to positive law point its at conflict with Russia and just BS about normal/neutral laws
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There is no international law that states you need to create a declaration of war in response to another country declaring war on you, super smart international law guy.
Russia declaring war on Ukraine means they are at war with each other.
Seems how you care about this subject so much, care to explain how it was totally legal for Russia to invade and bomb its neighbor two years before they declared war?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You are right but did Russia declared war on Ukraine ?
Russia recognised LNR and DNR
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-europe-60470900
They asked to help to push Nazis out of their territory so Russia started special military operation against Ukrainian Nazis. Ukraine fully ignored it and act like they are just fighting some separatist that have nothing to do with Russia so they breaking their own law when they were shooting at Russia soil. Also remember when they launched those raid in Belgorod they were telling its not Ukrainian army but Russian
See
But in 2024 shit started for Ukraine so it stopped playing by laws
They attacked Russia with no explanation why so here Putin contorted that Ukraine is a mad country and Russia needs a buffer zone.
Western media obviously ignored this moment.
Ukraine has nothing to gain from declaring war at Russia or accept that they have conflict with them so Ukraine is losing hard in laws sphere against Putin who is lawyer.
Also what US did with targeting Russian soil will back fire since by U.S. logic Russia can give Yemen long range weapons to target U.S. ships. It also now gives Russia fully legal reason to use nukes.
Laws have no feeling and despite west call Putin evil and corrupt but he never broke any law rules. Like he could ignore Russian laws about 2 terms but he never did it. He did gymnastics with those.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You on drugs, son?
Okay, but they had ground troops marching to their capital. That's not a proxy war, that's not supportive military opporation for civil war, that is straight up war.
Arguing semantics in war is already dumb enough, but even your semantic arguments make no sense.
Russia has a military presence in land that they themselves recognized as Ukraine until like a decade ago. That is all the legal justification Ukraine needs for any Military strike they make until Russia stops.
A nation that is being invaded never has anything to gain by declaring war. That means it is something they desire beyond just defending themselves. It can be used as a casus belli for the nation that is invading. This is exactly why it took so long for Russia to finally admit they are at war with Ukraine. I can't emphasize enough how r-slurred you are in this matter.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I stated how it is.
Ukraine don't consider that Russian are in Crimea. Because why would they if they can do all kind of shit to steal more money ? Ukraine literally has a governor of Crimea. That governor never visited Crimea in 10 years and supposedly building something for Crimea. Ukraine constitution says they need to fight for their territory and before 2022 they didn't fought for it.
So they just told they don't recognise anything and Crimea is Ukraine that's it.
In DNR and LNR they put martial law fighting separatist
You kinda correct, can you show me where Russian admitted they are at war ? So I can't empathised enough how rеtarded you are. Creating some bs that didnt happened to prove your point
If they have no interest declaring a war they shouldn't talk like they are at war and breaking their own laws and constitution.
All you do is ignoring the de jure. You ain't showing high iq. Are Russian and khohols fighting ? Yes. Is there a legal proof ? No.
And reason why Ukraine don't want to declare war because they will lose the option to freeze the war and will open again the Belarusian front and send Russia into full mobilisation. It also would hurt Ukrainian economy a lot because they STILL TRADE WITH RUSSIA
https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2024-03-29/ukraine-will-not-extend-its-gas-transit-contract-gazprom
They 100% will extend it. So if Ukraine is at war with Russia why it trades with Russia ? Russia is fighting some Nazi in Ukraine not Ukraine gov *on papers
So yeah you calling me r-slur yet you can't bring a proof there is war
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Either Russia didn't declare war and their invasion is a war crime which is a casus belli that does not need a formal declaration of war or they did and they don't need one.
You are grasping at straws. Q.E.D.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context