https://rdrama.net/h/slavshit/post/318871/why-british-storm-shadow-missiles-would/7362449#context
I post today's story that Ukrainian launched multiple storm shadows and they were intercepted. As counter argument he pulls out a story from July 2024
And then a story about ATACMS.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's because you doing it for second time bringing irrelevant arguments to the topic. So I was wondering if it's normal for pro Ukrainians or are you just the special r-slur.
You then bring up Crimea where Ukraine launched 1000 missiles of every types yet is confidently losing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Where are the interceptions?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Where are hits ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Substantiate your claim.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ukraine first time launched storm shadow in 2023 at same moment when UK told they gave them to Ukraine.
Today UK told they permit Ukraine to use storm shadow on Russian soil at same moment they launched them and there is no denying that they were used.
It's attacker responsibility to show proof that things got hit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They were EW intercepted
There no hit on this building that Ukraine was targeting
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wow, look at that. They targeted the Soviet era buildings about 300 yards away. Zero evidence of interception, close spacing of impact shows no evidence of jamming.
Please continue to cope and seethe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh so 6 misses
Those things supposed to have 3 meters error yet miss 50+ meters from jamming good job proving my point
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I don't get it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/proofster
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context