Unable to load image

Why pro Ukrainian like this

https://rdrama.net/h/slavshit/post/318871/why-british-storm-shadow-missiles-would/7362449#context

								

								

I post today's story that Ukrainian launched multiple storm shadows and they were intercepted. As counter argument he pulls out a story from July 2024

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17321230519949517.webp

And then a story about ATACMS.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1732123052380388.webp

10
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseycopeseethedilate:

Are you playing stupid or are you actually this low IQ?

https://rdrama.net/h/slavshit/post/318554/marseyparty-today-we-celebrate-the-1000th/7357836#context

>pinging users to laugh at Sal means I must be seething

>making whole thread because someone mocked your r-slurred cope thread isn't a sign Sal is seething at all

Gonna save some more posts to totally misunderstand later, or just shit your pants some more?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's because you doing it for second time bringing irrelevant arguments to the topic. So I was wondering if it's normal for pro Ukrainians or are you just the special r-slur.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17321240580241323.webp

You then bring up Crimea where Ukraine launched 1000 missiles of every types yet is confidently losing

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Where are the interceptions?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Where are hits ?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Sal claims missiles intercepted

>no one else claims missiles were even launched

:#marseyproofster:

Substantiate your claim.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>marseyproofster:

I don't get it :marseysad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ukraine first time launched storm shadow in 2023 at same moment when UK told they gave them to Ukraine.

Today UK told they permit Ukraine to use storm shadow on Russian soil at same moment they launched them and there is no denying that they were used.

It's attacker responsibility to show proof that things got hit.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyproofster: where is proofs of interception?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They were EW intercepted

https://i.rdrama.net/images/173212584258965.webp

There no hit on this building that Ukraine was targeting

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17321265294774084.webp

Wow, look at that. They targeted the Soviet era buildings about 300 yards away. Zero evidence of interception, close spacing of impact shows no evidence of jamming.

Please continue to cope and seethe.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

he's definitely not playing stupid

this is who he is

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I like it when he gets mad and for a second switches to using passable English, but immediately switches back to R-slurish when he runs out of grammar.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.