The play in question:
Yeah not enough evidence to overturn the call IMO.
"UPON FURTHER REVIEW, I DON'T WANT TO DIE OUTSIDE OF A FOOTBALL STADIUM IN MIAMI, CANES WIN"
Well yeah have you been to Miami Gardens? Well Wipeople will finally feel safe once they finish gentrifying the place. Thanks Formula 1!
You just knew when they zoomed in on the ACC command center that there was going to be frickery
Tru.
If you don't like that you don't like ACC refs
If you review a single play for 10 min, how can you have enough evidence to overturn?
I knew it was going to be reversed, not even a VT thing or anything really to do with the replay but an unranked team vs a top ten team at home, knew it was coming
COPE.
Should of kicked the fg instead of that shit fake play bad coaching
SEETHE
The ball was clearly loose and clearly touched someone out of bounds good lord
So clear it took 7 minutes for anyone to find it and it couldn't be shown on TV
DILATE.
And no one is really buying the official explanation either.
Offensive player had possession. Butt cheek down. Completed to the ground. Then knocked loose. Replay wanted MIAMI to 5-0. Carry on.
So
"After review, it's in the best interests of the ACC for Miami to win and remain undefeated. Therefore, it's an incomplete pass."
Much.
Lmao… because this outcome makes way more sense rigging it for Miami than just… calling it incomplete from the start.
Cope.
Lets see how the VT Subreddit is holding up.
VT fans be like 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Overturning it was the right call. Saw 8 angles of it and the player did not have control of the ball when he went down. The ball was caught between the legs of another player who was already out of bounds.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
CFB is good when the neighborscin Miami are balling out.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'll watch CFB anytime the teams are ranked the same or both are below #20.
There has been very few close calls lately since they're always #1s vs #2s
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Repeating the obvious, but this controversy/"controversy" wouldn't be so big in the first place if the refs simply didn't initially rule the catch as a touchdown
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Then you cant review it and the game ends, which becomes an even bigger controversy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
it shouldn't have been ruled a catch
and it shouldn't have been overturned
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
VT is perennially overrated trash.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/CFB/comments/1fr5jjs/postgame_thread_miami_defeats_virginia_tech_3834/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
MORE CFB SNEADING here.:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
And no one is really buying the official explanation either.:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context