Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is dumb. The only point they may have is that requiring six to twelve rounds of IUI to prove infertility is probably excessive; three is usually the amount clinics recommend in the US as being statistically useful to try (ie if you don't conceive after three stats show more rounds probably aren't worth it).

Any women without proven infertility that wants to skip that and go straight to something as medically intensive as IVF is an idiot though. And frankly, I don't blame the NHS clinics that require a husband or partner either. In those cases there's at least a chance the issue is male factor, and that's easier to succeed at IVF with. That and a built in support person during the IVF and—if lucky—pregnancy after, also likely leading to better outcomes. With only so much money to go around, it makes a cold sense why they'd prioritize those patients.

I mean, it sucks if you're single, but life sort of ain't fair and the NHS wouldn't have paid for that one lady's six cycles even if she was married. Six cycles is insane, for the record. If you know you're single and know you want kids, it's kinda on you to get that sorted earlier and you're foolish to count on IVF or the NHS to rescue you. :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've known more coherent downies.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.