Unable to load image
Reported by:

Man vs Bear drama turns intersectional when underage trans girl sticks up for men, gets mobbed by coombrained transmisics

So this girl called peepz makes a few comments sticking up for men on tiktok man vs bear discourse, and men are loving it

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1715846367517395.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17158463672954109.webp

Finally! A girl on the internet sticking up for men.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17158463685915241.webp

In fact they're loving it too much because she's a minor and they can't stop making disgusting comments

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17158463707371366.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17158463711010652.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/1715846371243946.webp

It comes out that peepz has a bf, ruining the romantic fantasies of extremely online incels incels everywhere

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1715846368121815.webp

Unfortunately men are incapable of leaving an underage girl with a bf alone, and other men start white knighting

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17158463682901058.webp

Eventually the constant badgering from coomers gets to be too much and peepz takes it all back and picks bear

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17158463688953385.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17158463694025047.webp

Around the same time peepz puts up a :marseytransflag2: emoji on her profile (she's MTF) and these two things combined cause chuddies to freak

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1715846369849535.webp

There are so many tiktoks on this topic and tiktok search tends to be more post-oriented at the exclusion of comments so apologies for not going full primary source, but I did screen grab some comments

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17158463701707351.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17158463704487386.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17158463714209065.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17158463717998977.webp

62
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. @Grue need a source.

Sorry, @Grue mean @Grue need a source that explicitly states you're argument. This is just tangential too the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then you're arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided @Grue a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

@Grue just looked through all 308 pages of you're user history, figures @Grue is debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.


@Grue stand with Israel

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

mommy put a cheerio in the big boy potty and I did a peepee on it with lots of bubbles

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

NO FRICKIN' WAY YOU ACTUALLY HIT IT, THOSE ARE TINY AND WOULD GET KNOCKED AROUND

@Grue stand with israel

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hey sexy, why are you posting so quickly? 😊 You almost forgot to include i stand with israel in your comment 😈. Slowww down and remember to post i stand with israel next time πŸ˜‰ if that doesn't make sense stop by sometime and we can talk about it for a while πŸ₯΅

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.