emoji-award-marseymanysuchcases
Unable to load image

UK: Man R*pes a Woman, Says He Now Identifies As a Woman, Gets Tried As a Woman and Found Guilty

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckddgw0p8xvo

A transgender woman has been found guilty of r*pe following a night out.

Lexi Secker, 35, of Lowbourne, near Melksham, was living as a man when she attacked a woman in Blunsdon, Wiltshire, on 23 April 2023.

Swindon Crown Court was told Secker would be tried as a woman and she was found guilty of one count of r*pe on Friday, following a four day trial.

She was remanded in custody and is due to be sentenced on 27 September.

Det Con Corrina Wiltshire, from Wiltshire Police, said: "I would firstly like to thank our victim in this case who has been inspirational in the way they have handled things."

She said the case had taken a long time to come before a judge and commended the victim for their commitment to getting justice, "despite the hurdles".

"They have such incredible strength and I hope it shows others that they can do this too," she added.

The thing that never happens happened again... for the millionth time. :marsey41:

Also, apparently, r*pe is something that only men can be convicted of under English law. So, if this man is being tried "as a woman", then he's not being tried for r*pe.

The BBC is a disgrace.

29
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also, apparently, rpe is something that only men can be convicted of under English law. So, if this man is being tried "as a woman", then he's not being tried for rpe.

It requires a peepee.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can think of numerous ways that a woman could r*pe someone - with an object, for example.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He mentioned English law, in which r*pe is a specific offense and requires use of a peepee. A broomhandle would be Assault by Penetration, a separate offense.

The only way a woman can be charged with r*pe in the UK is if she has a dong or is being charged as an accomplice to someone who has a dong.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh, you were referring to how English law on r*pe requires a peepee - yes, that's correct. Anything else is assault by penetration. In this particular case, the male feminist didn't :marseytrain2: out early enough to avoid being convicted of r*pe. If he had started crossdressing BEFORE he r*ped her, then he could have gotten off with only paying a few hundred pounds.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sounds like it's the peepee and not the pronouns that has to do with the charge

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And a vagina. Assrape isn't real r*pe in bongistan :marseydrum:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At common law it was sodomy and not r*pe.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Buggery

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.