there is no such thing as a sinful mode of production
Yes there is it's called capitalism it promotes sin and the worst parts of humanity and adulates this as good and just. Capitalism promotes godlessness.
i don't think you really understand christian soteriology
I don't need to know gay butt words to know that the way things are organized now is for satanic ends
Gods creation is good, and It is man that is sinful, and That you cannot understand the significance of this is an indication that you dont really understand the Christian theological framework, and Youre like just a Marxist-Leninist who wants to co-opt the Christian aesthetic and subordinate Christianity to your ideological agenda, and I dont think you are doing this intentionally, youre like just too ignorant to realize thats what youre doing
Modes of production promote behavior I never said Capitalism created sin
Changing the mode of production wont change mankind or sin, and The like only thing that can save mankind is salvation through faith in God
Your ideological stance is a form of idolatry because you implicitly privelege revolution and changing the mode of production over faith and prayer, and Your repeated fixation on and justification of the mode of production over mankinds inherently sinful nature is an indication of your lack of understanding and inadvertent idolatry, and You care primarily about changing the mode of production and you merely see Christianity as a means of achieving this change
gods creation is good, and it is man that is sinful, and that you cannot understand the significance of this is an indication that you dont really understand the christian theological framework,
Doesn't refute what I said
changing the mode of production wont change mankind or sin
Didn't say that. Behaviors can be promoted. This is not the same as removing sin
your ideological stance is a form of idolatry because you implicitly privelege revolution and changing the mode of production over faith and prayer, and your repeated fixation on and justification of the mode of production over mankinds inherently sinful nature is an indication of your lack of understanding and inadvertent idolatry, and you care primarily about changing the mode of production and you merely see christianity as a means of achieving this change
When you mocked the statement that humans sin, not economic processes, you demonstrated your fundamental misunderstanding of Christian theology. Economic processes cannot be sinful because they are not human. Only humans are sinful.
Behaviors can be promoted. This is not the same as removing sin
The source of mankind's sin is the Fall. Changing the mode of production will not preempt sin. Man would sin just as much under Communism, just in different ways.
Welcome to /h/truth, rdrama's hole for Christianity of all denominations.
Everyone is welcome here, protestants, catholics, greek orthodox, mormons, jews, muslims, hindus, and atheists, as long as you have an interest in Jesus Christ.
Feel free to post discussion, conversation, news, memes, or anything else related to the Christian faith.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes there is it's called capitalism it promotes sin and the worst parts of humanity and adulates this as good and just. Capitalism promotes godlessness.
I don't need to know gay butt words to know that the way things are organized now is for satanic ends
学习雷锋好榜样忠于革命忠于党爱憎分明不忘本立场坚定斗志强立场坚定斗志强学习雷锋好榜样毛主席的教导记心上全心全意为人民共产主义品德多高尚共产主义品德多高尚
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wrong, humans sin, not economic processes, and Furthermore, sin is a product of the Fall, not a mode of production
This is basic Christian belief
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes and Capitalism promotes more sin. "Soddom and Gamorrah aren't sinful cities they just have sinful people" -you
Modes of production promote behavior I never said Capitalism created sin.
You're arguing with shit I haven't said and what you do say doesn't counter what I say
学习雷锋好榜样忠于革命忠于党爱憎分明不忘本立场坚定斗志强立场坚定斗志强学习雷锋好榜样毛主席的教导记心上全心全意为人民共产主义品德多高尚共产主义品德多高尚
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Gods creation is good, and It is man that is sinful, and That you cannot understand the significance of this is an indication that you dont really understand the Christian theological framework, and Youre like just a Marxist-Leninist who wants to co-opt the Christian aesthetic and subordinate Christianity to your ideological agenda, and I dont think you are doing this intentionally, youre like just too ignorant to realize thats what youre doing
Changing the mode of production wont change mankind or sin, and The like only thing that can save mankind is salvation through faith in God
Your ideological stance is a form of idolatry because you implicitly privelege revolution and changing the mode of production over faith and prayer, and Your repeated fixation on and justification of the mode of production over mankinds inherently sinful nature is an indication of your lack of understanding and inadvertent idolatry, and You care primarily about changing the mode of production and you merely see Christianity as a means of achieving this change
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Doesn't refute what I said
Didn't say that. Behaviors can be promoted. This is not the same as removing sin
Wrong and
学习雷锋好榜样忠于革命忠于党爱憎分明不忘本立场坚定斗志强立场坚定斗志强学习雷锋好榜样毛主席的教导记心上全心全意为人民共产主义品德多高尚共产主义品德多高尚
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
When you mocked the statement that humans sin, not economic processes, you demonstrated your fundamental misunderstanding of Christian theology. Economic processes cannot be sinful because they are not human. Only humans are sinful.
The source of mankind's sin is the Fall. Changing the mode of production will not preempt sin. Man would sin just as much under Communism, just in different ways.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Humans create economic processes
学习雷锋好榜样忠于革命忠于党爱憎分明不忘本立场坚定斗志强立场坚定斗志强学习雷锋好榜样毛主席的教导记心上全心全意为人民共产主义品德多高尚共产主义品德多高尚
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And humans sin.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context