emoji-award-chudspin2
Unable to load image

average Christian response Reminder: Jesus would want you to forgive BIPOCs for being BIPOCs; he would never tell you to pretend that BIPOCs aren't BIPOCs

Jesus would never condemn anyone for pointing out objective facts about BIPOCs and the consequences of BIPOC behavior, the same way that Jesus pointed out facts about the Jews and Jewish behavior. Christ would tell us to forgive, but never to delude ourselves about what we're forgiving. Atheists like heymoon (too lazy to look up his current name to ping him) confuse the two because BIPOCs are the god of the modern atheist, as unquestionable as the Pharisees were to a Jew in the time of Christ.


:#marseyklennycross:

43
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The death of God; what matters is not the truth, but the scaffolding which the fiction provides. In the absence of this structure, this metaphysical mooring, what ultimate justification can there be for any moral or ethical system, given that the basis of any moral system, at its heart, boils down to nothing more than what is customary, at a given place and time?

The atheist, and his close cousin the secular humanist, may repeat with a sneer: "Through God, *all things are possible!" Invoking, with sinister derision, the great volume of atrocities which have been repeated and reenacted throughout recorded history in God's name.

But what is the essence, what is at the core, the kernel within the shell of the ethic of a 'secular' humanist, if not a Christian ethic? And worse--for while the Christian is preoccupied with the mindless repetition of rituals and dogmas which he has inherited without a second critical glance (including many, to his dismay, inherited from pagan ritual and pagan dogma, a fact which lies at the very edge of his consciousness, undermining his faith and his confidence in the courage of his convictions, poisoning every act of virtue or Christian charity by casting aspersions on the validity of his "Truth"), the Humanist, that philosophical descendant of Christ who denies his metaphysical lineage, what lies at the heart, what scaffolding supports the belief system of a 'Secular' humanist, in contrast to the mystic Christian whom he regards with such derision and contempt?

Nothing!

The ethics of the secular humanist are not even built on a foundation of sand, and yet he mocks and scorns the Christian for his blind adherence to a doctrine whose history stretches far back, to the frayed edges and beyond the bounds of recorded time.

:marseynietzsche:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1701695785632276.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'll pray for u bb 🙏 😘

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.