Unable to load image

Poorcels :marseywagie: seethe at Overwatch 2's Phone Requirement: 'It's Like Being Punished For Being Poor' :marseypoor: :marseylaugh:

https://kotaku.com/overwatch-2-phone-requirement-fps-blizzard-cricket-mint-1849620021

This belongs in /h/peakpoors aswell :#marseypoor::#marseywagie::#mcmarsey:

“It feels like being punished for being poor,” Overwatch player Richard Meunster told Kotaku over email. Along with 19 million other people, Richard and his brother both use Cricket Wireless, one of the prepaid phone services that Overwatch 2 will not accept for its newly instated, mandatory two-factor authentication system, SMS Protect.

Every single Overwatch 2 player, including those who had previously purchased Overwatch, need to provide a phone number that fits certain requirements in order to start the game. As part of those requirements, numbers can’t be attached to a prepaid phone plan, landline, or use VOIP. Though what remains of Blizzard’s heart seems to be in the right place—the developer hopes the requirement will cut down “both cheating and disruptive behavior”—players like Richard are forgotten. Not because they don’t play well or don’t care or don’t want to have fun, but because they can’t afford the right kind of phone.

Prepaid phone plans like Cricket and Mint Mobile allow people to pay the cost of their usage up front. Though unfairly maligned as Breaking Bad-type “burner phones,” prepaid phones are easier to incorporate into low-income budgets, with monthly cost usually between $15 and $50. Some companies like AT&T even advertise prepaid services directly to low-income customers.

Richard, a college student, uses Cricket’s $50 monthly plan because “if you can’t pay it that month they just shut down the phone instead of taking you to collections.”

“If I get a regular phone plan and then can’t pay, my credit score gets destroyed,” he said.

At one point in 2020, there were 74 million prepaid phone plan users in the U.S. alone. Richard is far from being the only Overwatch player being phased out.

“I am ashamed of having a prepaid phone,” one Reddit user, who posted in /r/Overwatch and received one thousand upmarseys in less than 24 hours, said. “Never thought I would be disqualified from playing Overwatch based on my ability to afford a phone contract, but here we are...Blizzard is the first company to make me feel too poor to play a game.”

Read More: Be Prepared For These 7 Big Overwatch 2 Gameplay Changes

“Cannot believe Blizzard is denying people with prepaid phone plans access to Overwatch 2,” one Twitter user wrote. “Why does it matter how I pay my phone bill?? 6 years of my life, all the time, money, and progress down the drain.”

Blizzard’s phone restrictions seem to primarily and widely impair U.S. prepaid phone plan users, and the company did not return Kotaku’s request for comment in time for publication. Prepaid phone users in other countries have reported being able to log into the game problem-free, which some players speculate could either be because their country necessitates identification in order to purchase a prepaid phone, or because Blizzard has only banned known prepaid phone plans.

“This is why the system isn’t going to stop hackers or smurfs,” one Reddit user wrote. “They’ll just use a virtual number service that Blizz don’t know about.”

While Blizzard works it out, Richard and countless other low-income prepaid phone users are hurting.

“It feels like a large injustice,” Richard said. “Cheap postpaid plans are around $90. If you are a prepaid phone owner who really wants to play Overwatch 2, you are looking at $50 more a month to get a Blizzard-approved phone. Talk about going free-to-play.”

73
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

having a real name traceable phone is soy tier communication. Stallman was right.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseytinfoil:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

not wrong, but privacy has been an elite feature for a while now. should tell you something

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That you’re doing something illegal on your phone?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

that could be a valid conclusion if you think having a traceable phone is mandatory, but that thought is obviously stupid. did you check in with your local police about your movements, today? why would you not want to? just register, you have nothing to hide

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is this @bbbb's alt account?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, this is my real account. And what exactly is an alt account?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's an alternate account. It's a 90's thing.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Welcome to the 21st century!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

maybe, and about you're just too dense about telling a bot from a silly human. Got that going for ya.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Who the frick are you

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i'm nobody, you too, lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Sorry, but your line of thinking is idiotsically naive. If you actually stop and think about it for two seconds, you'll realize that having a government- traceable phone is a massive invasion of privacy. Why would I want to check in with the police about my movements today? That's none of their business. And just because I have nothing to hide doesn't mean I want the government snooping around in my life.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

no, but i think there are people who think that everyone having a traceable phone at all times is a good thing. I agree that your movements are none of their business, but what do we say say to them?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Did you not read the part where I said I don't think everyone having a traceable phone at all times is a good thing? Do you not have basic reading comprehension skills? Or do you just enjoy disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing? Either way, I don't have time for this nonsense.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.