I'm sorry guys, I feel like I am going fricking insane in this thread; none of you motherlovers understand the idea of legal precedent?
Even beyond legal precedent (which is explicitly why they are targeting The Crew, they see this as the easiest case to win and subsequently gain precedent for more important cases/games in the future), every single website you go on now asks you about cookies because the EU made a law on it. How is this so hard to understand? If they win this case, it could very well have a domino effect on the entire industry, regardless of whether the games are made in the EU or not, just like all the US sites that follow the EU laws on cookies.
Sometimes I can't tell if you guys are just confidently r-slurred/wrong, or if it's a bit. I think its just r-sluration in this case
I haven't been following this all that closely but I'm assuming they're going after this one because it was developed by French studios, and the French government has a history of being extremely neurodivergent about art preservation
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I get the reasoning as to why, but all over a decade-old mediocre racing game that nobody played? At least choose something good to start this over.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm sorry guys, I feel like I am going fricking insane in this thread; none of you motherlovers understand the idea of legal precedent?
Even beyond legal precedent (which is explicitly why they are targeting The Crew, they see this as the easiest case to win and subsequently gain precedent for more important cases/games in the future), every single website you go on now asks you about cookies because the EU made a law on it. How is this so hard to understand? If they win this case, it could very well have a domino effect on the entire industry, regardless of whether the games are made in the EU or not, just like all the US sites that follow the EU laws on cookies.
Sometimes I can't tell if you guys are just confidently r-slurred/wrong, or if it's a bit. I think its just r-sluration in this case
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssstop with the ssssssssssssssssssseriousposting
(but you're right I can't tell if people are just pretending to be r-slurred to rile me up)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I haven't been following this all that closely but I'm assuming they're going after this one because it was developed by French studios, and the French government has a history of being extremely neurodivergent about art preservation
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context