All in all, was the controversy justified? :marseysociety2: :marseybatmangenocide:

This cost Warner Brothers 200 Million btw

:#marseychartdowntrend2:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17274905426203203.webp :#marseyloonalove::#marseyloonalove::#marseyloonalove:

35
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Was pretty dumb and ridiculous and cheap to kill off such a big character (and also woke too if that bothers you)...though I suppose the whole controversy would've been more muted had Kevin Conroy not tragically passed away after recording for this game...

It's funny to see just how much this game was damaging financial-wise...when have we ever seen such a big ahh dud of an AAA game before?

!comicshitters !g*mers discuss :marseycia:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't think anything will ever top that 80s ET game, at least WB aren't having to bury a million copies in Mexico.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The 80s ET game didn't have a studio of 200 white womans exploiting the producers and distracting the devs and injecting the script with their white woman shit.

80s ET game was just 8 dudebros who accidentally spent all their budget on cocaine and time on doing cocaine.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Atari lost over $500m in 1983, they weren't exactly 10 guys working out of their garage

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well it's kind of a funny era because gaming companies were getting big but the games were still made quickly and by a few people.

OG Space Invaders was mostly made by one guy and adjusted for inflation it made more than one and a half billion

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

80s ET game was much closer to 2 dudes given 6 weeks to churn out an Atari Christmas classic than a cocaine bender.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.