Unable to load image

game development cycles are only getting longer over time

Time between GTA V and GTA vi = 12 years

Time between elden ring and sekiro shadows die twice = 3 years (longest gap for fromsoft)

Time between death stranding 1 and 2 = 5 years

Call of Duty BO 6 development time - 4 years ( new record for a CoD game )

Time between Doom 2016 and doom eternal - 4 years

Time between Doom eternal and Doom the dark ages - 4 years

The last of us part 2 development time - 6+ years

Generally video game development time is considered to be around 3-5 years, but here we can see that for triple AAA titles it is 4-10 years of development now, with the development times likely to only get longer over time as the effort required to make a better game keeps increasing as every new game requires more features in a competitive market and budgets balloon into the hundreds of millions.

At the rate things are going, expect your favorite games sequel to come out once every 5 years.

The video game development cycle has just become too long to keep a consumer excited any longer. The technology is advancing too slow and no longer moving in leaps and bounds, with the in game technology barely catching up to graphics demos from ten years ago.

After GTA VI comes out, how many of you are ready to wait another 15 years for GTA VII to come out? A video game franchise appeal just doesn't last that long.

9
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Budgets seem to be ballooning like a disney movie or stream offering and with similar quality of such.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I agree with you. what if gta vi turns out to be crap

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm pretty confident it will at least disappoint as will the next elder scrolls if they have even tried to start making it yet.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think the gaming industry will collapse halfway if GTA VI comes out a flop.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I seriously think that that is the direction we are headed. The current paradigm is very obviously not sustainable and I don't really get it; why are companies essentially gambling the existence of entire studios on singular releases? Surely it is more risky to do that than to just consistently put out quality. Just seems like the entire industry is more or less held hostage by a bunch of geriatric investors that don't have the slightest clue nor give a shit about games :marseysad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think its a case of sunk cost fallacy.

If they went to any model that is normal 2 year game releases the quality would now be lower than a 5 year development cycle the first 3-4 games.

You also have to take into account that video game tech isn't advancing fast enough to create anything noticeably better within a two year time span. You barely noticed the upgrade from the ps4 to the ps5. Although to be fair the full potential of the ps5 has still not been utilized and you generally see the truly noticeable best quality games at the end of the generation.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.