Sources:
https://www.conservapedia.com/Gender_confusion !g*mersFrom Conservapedia’s “gender confusion” page pic.twitter.com/gWg5OOqXE7
— depths of conservapedia (@ConservDepths) October 4, 2024
Sources:
https://www.conservapedia.com/Gender_confusion !g*mersFrom Conservapedia’s “gender confusion” page pic.twitter.com/gWg5OOqXE7
— depths of conservapedia (@ConservDepths) October 4, 2024
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fringe nonsense with no basis in scientific data, there was never a point in time where any significant percentage of nutrition experts and doctors actually believed that it is just as healthy to be morbidly obese. You can find people with PhDs who publish books about ancient aliens or flat earth but those aren't taken seriously and rightfully so. The popularity of your examples is artificial and due to them being pushed politically.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm on your side. This is the difference between science which, you are describing, says that being obese is one of the biggest indicators of poor health, and The Science™ which is a religion and is inherently political. The clergy of "experts" in my original comment should be in quotes. The problem is even if it's fringe, people believe it, they have faith in it, which makes Scientism a religion.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It seems more like they're twisting science and using it as a justification for things they already want to believe rather than them following it blindly and seeing it as the only valuable source of knowledge and guidance (which is what comes to mind when hearing "Scientism")
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Exactly
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context