Because writers are so busy subverting dead tropes that no one is actually using those tropes in first place, causing the whole subversion to become the set of tired tropes
Snappybeep/boop
Join !friendsofsnappy
14d ago#7336224
spent 0 currency on pings
Culturally and philosophically I would consider them a man but when I consider who I want to have s*x with I don't always consider it on a cultural and philosophical level.
Very ugly females that identify as women for example are also culturally and philosophically women but I don't want to have s*x with them either because they're ugly.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because writers are so busy subverting dead tropes that no one is actually using those tropes in first place, causing the whole subversion to become the set of tired tropes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Why not both?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Culturally and philosophically I would consider them a man but when I consider who I want to have s*x with I don't always consider it on a cultural and philosophical level.
Very ugly females that identify as women for example are also culturally and philosophically women but I don't want to have s*x with them either because they're ugly.
Snapshots:
https://boards.4chan.org/v/thread/694635139#p694635139:
archived.moe
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context