Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

HL 2 was objectively a bad game.

The world, characters and lore are objectively uninteresting and generic.

What made HL2 even remotely playable: fancy physics and technology (at the time) that is now outdated and irrelevant.

And lastly, nobody with a functional braincell cares.

Move out of your parents basement and go have s*x.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

artifact is the only good valve game, it's 4d chess :#marseybigbrain:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nu-zoomer hands typed this post :marseybibtalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nah, you wish though incel.

I still got that free steam redeem coupon from 2004 for HL2 from when I bought my first GPU.

I'm just not a Manchild whose stuck in past and has to attempt to relive their childhood through nostalgia and comodity-worship.

Cope and seethe my friend, go play with some legos or something and cool off a bit, maybe your wife's bf can join and you can build morgon freeman together.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.tenor.com/pZPtwKvANscAAAAx/jebaited-low-quality-bait.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also Far Cry had better graphics.

You can now throw you chair at your monitor and go cry in a corner nerd.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

HL2 was more a tech demo than a real halflife game.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

HL was more of a tech demo than a real HL2 game

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Valve is not a game developer. They are a game retailer. Anyone who treats them as a serious developer is a fanboy commodity fetishist stuck in past.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But Steam wasn't the main moneymaker back then? :marseyconfused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.