Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Elden recreated the image multiple times over the years and had the word โ€œNevermindโ€ tattooed on his chest

Guess that grift wasn't paying enough


![](/images/16674454055116708.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah I have no attachment to nirvana but what a piece of shit


https://i.rdrama.net/images/1707881499271494.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17101210991135056.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The best thing Nirvana put out was Kurt's brains against the wall so that Dave could start up Foo fighters.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Imply it wasn't Love who blew his brains out

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's why I didn't say " Kurt put out".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

implying i read your comment fully before making mine

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The true drama way

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's still pretty funny though. Like there's definitely a baby's peepee on a platinum record, and nobody can even argue with that. It's not like a bunch paedos are beating off to it, but still there is bound to be epic lulz in this lawsuit

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The lawsuit is going to be thrown out really quickly without going anywhere.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There's like a 20% chance they give him 150k to avoid paying lawyers, that seems like the gamble. Even with the music industry decimated, "Nevermind" still printing some monies indefinitely.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Im sure someone has beat off to it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why, when you can beat off the the cover of Virgin Killer instead. I remember the seethe about that one getting auto-banned by the Wikipedia AI.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do I want to look that up?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

u like nude 11 year olds?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

u like german rock and roll?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

The court inquiry proved it was perfectly legal in most countries.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Im not looking that up but i think of heard of it is it of like a naked girl?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its a drawing of preteen girl with the vag censored by a fake crack in the case.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Most angsty teenagers who go through a Nirvana phase are too busy jacking off over Kurt to notice the peen.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And here we are now. Entertain us.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Who said something like: "I can't define pornography but I know it when I see it".

The guy suing sees the image as porn, is therefore sexually attracted to infants, and should be put on a watch list.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Same energy as the "you depicted a stupid brute barbaric being, why are you racist towards black people?" crowd

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That was Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in 1964! He was talking about how to determine what was considered hard-core porn. It was in the case Jacobellis v. Ohio and was about whether Ohio could ban a movie theater from showing an "obscene" film, called "The Lovers."

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh, and what was the outcome.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Supreme Court overturned the conviction of the movie theater manager Jacobellis, saying that the film was not obscene and that it meant his showing of the film was protected by the Constitution. Interestingly enough, the opinions of the majority Justices were not all in alignment, as the reasons they overturned the conviction were essentially different, the most well-known ambiguity being the inability to nail down what obscenity truly meant!

The Supreme Court later narrowed down its definition of obscenity in 1973 in the case of Miller v. California. In that case, the Supreme Court changed its definition of obscenity from material that completely lacks "socially redeeming value" to material that lacks "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thank you, that is interesting.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're very welcome, @Sir_Slapadicc. Laws re: obscenity are honestly fascinating.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

exactly what i thought, if a picture of a naked child is sexual to you you probably are a libertarian

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So if the judge decides it's CP then anyone who owns the album is a criminal?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://nypost.com/2016/09/23/nirvana-baby-recreates-iconic-album-cover-25-years-later/

Who woulda thunk having your picture taken as a child would force you to end up as a vapid LA street urchin with no marketable qualities and the processing speed of an abacus. Obviously he deserves recompense for his trauma.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pictures and videos of children are unironically a net negative to society. They shouldn't be allowed in any way shape or form. Period.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

all forms of photography are haram

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Everyone knows cameras steal souls


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17092367509484937.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711210096745272.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

not being wealthy enough to commission Lifesize oil portraits of yourself, as well as etched plates for reproduction in various broadsheets

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I will support this if you will support shaming women sharing their periods online.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What made you assume I don't support this already?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The fact that women sharing their periods online causes drama.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its probably not going to lead to anything happening but id love for cancel culture to determine that Kurt Cobain sucks, actually

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If he wanted to sue Nirvana for ripping off the Pixies and Meat Puppets that'd be one thing but this is an entirely new level of neurodivergent

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I actually get so blackpilled when I realize most of you strags are depressed losers who most likely gravitated here because no one likes them and not because they actually have intellectual backing for their


Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You mean to tell me that baby is STILL chasing that dollar?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

LOL

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is going to be a lolsy suit. Guy is obviously looking for a payday.

Why is there a naked baby in the first place though? Then again, if I was a libertarian, I'd get my wife to murder me too.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.