Pitchfork admits it: their reviewers are total hacks; Twitter clowns on them even harder 🀑

https://twitter.com/pitchfork/status/1445390774829522950?t=7nnHfstBTu6k5XlbO6jzxw&s=19

Another thread because they posted it twice: https://twitter.com/pitchfork/status/1445418549388906499?t=2tqzBYKuwYezeiRzEIMO8A&s=19

28
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There's literally 0 reason to read reviews for any piece of media in the current year. Movies, TV shows, music, games, it's all available somewhat cheaply and in 1 click.

There's a reason why most of them are leaning more heavily into critique/essay/philosophical nonsense "woah this is such a profound critique of capitalism/racism/whatever" - otherwise there'd be no point in them - and lmao imagine letting a piece of entertainment give you a lesson about morality or politics, or consooming a review reinforcing it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People who read music reviews are cute twinks. Either go to a show with people or listen on some quality speakers at home and then discuss with friends who have similar tastes. If you take the opinions of random journos seriously, you’re too stupid to form opinions or too much of a loser to have friends to talk to.


This morning, Cum went to the park. I went with Coom. And Cum brought Coomer frisbee. At least I think it was Coomers. By the end of the day, Cum started throwing the frisbee to Cumself.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.


https://pomf2.lain.la/f/0lzdq3px.gif

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Accurate


This morning, Cum went to the park. I went with Coom. And Cum brought Coomer frisbee. At least I think it was Coomers. By the end of the day, Cum started throwing the frisbee to Cumself.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You can tell this is true just by looking at the people who are replying to the tweet

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think you'd have to make a distinction between analysis or historiographical pieces vs reviews. Literally cannot fathom reading a music review for any reason other than to maybe find something new to listen to. Anyone who thinks they can coldly assign a score to one of the most subjective art forms of all time has no soul.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I did make a distinction. At no point did I mention historical contextualization of works, or analysis of song structures. I said REVIEWS. I stand by what I said.


This morning, Cum went to the park. I went with Coom. And Cum brought Coomer frisbee. At least I think it was Coomers. By the end of the day, Cum started throwing the frisbee to Cumself.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I was agreeing with you, just adding pointless info.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I was also agreeing with you, just also adding useless info.


This morning, Cum went to the park. I went with Coom. And Cum brought Coomer frisbee. At least I think it was Coomers. By the end of the day, Cum started throwing the frisbee to Cumself.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

(((πŸ€₯)))


Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ian Cohen πŸ€”

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Literally this

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

upgrading queen charli

:marseyagree: :marseythumbsup:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At least they're embracing it

E: NVM, I'm mad about the Big Boi score drop, frick these dumb hacks.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17092367509484937.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17093267613293715.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711210096745272.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they give RAM a score drop because it wasn't as influential as Discovery??? fricking r-slurs :marseydisagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why read a half hour long review about an hour long album? Just download and then buy if you like it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They bumped chief keed BFTD1 from a 7.9 to a 9.1 for literally no reason. I’m a huge Chief Keef fan but that project absolutely does not deserve anything higher than a 7.5. Thotbreaker and BFTD2 on the other hand deserve that score. Not even these hipster writers understand that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You are litteraly insulting George floyd legacy by saying that. :marseyfloyd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Floyd listened to a bunch of Houston shit and he was a old head, there’s no way he liked Sosa. He was one of those β€œkids these days” kinda guys if you’ve ever seen that one video of him

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yeah but he's black, so...

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pitchfork's review of Tool's magnum opus "Lateralus" cracks me up

https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/8104-lateralus/

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I wish they would do reviews like that for Radiohead/Thom Yorke stuff. Would cause monumental seething considering RH fans are as insufferable as TOOL fans

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The only good Radiohead albums are The Bends and The King of Limbs.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Disgusting.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

TOTBL is at minimum an 8.0.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's a darn good album. Listening to "NYC" while taking the Manhattan MTA in the wee hours of the morning when there's only like 5 people in the train with you is absolute perfection.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.