So basically there was this REALLY dumb rightoid that would hang out in the groomercords before the election, easily the dumbest rightoid to ever exist in any drama community. He went by "eva" most of the time.
He made a bunch of bets with me and other groomercord users in which he claimed Trump would win Cali/NY etc and become president via a "major landslide." Months in advance I pinned my prediction he'd be back on election night declaring voter fraud and refusing to honor his bets, he then vanished as we mocked him and nobody has seen him again.
I recently encountered this "Johnnyapplesneed" user here that is a rightoid of such incredible r-sluration I seriously think it might be eva, he has a unique r-sluration you won't really find in other rightoids.
Can anyone confirm this?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's a brave statement to make atm, tbh. We have quite a few rightoids with unfathomable levels of r-sluration, so singling just one out is hard...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Eva is my white whale, I do not say this lightly - he is by far, by far the most r-slurred rightoid I have ever encountered in the dramapshere. Sometimes I'd watch him talk in my server and just be taken back by the nuclear r-sluration glow he had around him.
This is a guy that unironically made bets with multiple people stating Trump was going to not only win California, but NY as well.
He was a Canadian rightoid so he wasn't very well versed in American politics, so he got literally everything he knew via 4chan and pol. So he had the most warped and insane political views you can imagine.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You shouldn't make bets with the mentally r-slurred, and anyone who thought the orange man would win one of those states let alone both is extremely r-slurred. I have to question how this person could work a computer or even read
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hey... hold on a second! Since when does the site's word filter allow egregious terms like R-SLURRED and not filter it to r-slured?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The comma at the end probably prevented r-slurred from being filtered.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But there's no comma in my
R-SLURRED
R-SLURRED
R-SLURRED
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Maybe not working right now.
Which reminds me,
@carpathianflorist, I couldn't help but notice the absence of my Unironically r-slurred badge that I had requested. 
Surely this is some mistake, just reminding in case you forgot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hang on - you just request badges and you get them? Just like that?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nah, I have provided medical proof of my neurodivergence to Carp.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I got so used to just typing r-slurred I forgot it was a filter and not just lingo tbh.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You can disable it in your settings. Word filters are on by default.
Krayon sexually assaulted his sister.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Wdym? Youβve always been able to say r-slur.
This morning, Cum went to the park. I went with Coom. And Cum brought Coomer frisbee. At least I think it was Coomers. By the end of the day, Cum started throwing the frisbee to Cumself.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Found the voter fraud cover upper guys.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
LOL!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Isn't that a regular rightoid trait?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We need some insane communists and wokes for the diversity.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I just want to make it clear I will be very malding if I end up categorized as a rightoid.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's kinda like stabbing someone when you go to prison so no one fricks with you. You gotta label yourself an r-slur before anyone else can categorize you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Also...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Including Jonna's and even your own?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
IDK I'm not pathetic enough to use Groomercord.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Only zoomers and pedos use groomercord
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah sorry op I don't hold interest in prepubescent children
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm not a furry p-do that's why I don't use it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Holy shit this loop is good
He looks like he should have steam blowing out of his ears
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Is it even a conspiracy to consider that election fraud could have happened? America uses such convoluted systems that appear to be possibly vulnerable to manipulation. Every documentary I've watched about it just boiled down to "how dare those rightoids and Trump call fraud" without providing much evidence as to how it can't be or wasn't rigged.
Also, I honestly thought Trump would have got a second term, he was that popular (or appeared to be). Why wouldn't the democrats or who ever say "he musnt get a second term no matter what"? Anyways that said, enjoy it when China's fricking you in the bussy you dumb fat r-slurs, democrat or republican, it won't matter in the end.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lmao America has such a massive, disorganized election system it makes organized fraud basically impossible. In order to engage in any organized fraud here you'd have to bring in thousands of people all operating under different rules and regulations.
It's legit not possible.
The issue is the claims they make are so r-slurred and incoherent you don't need much to refute them. Even so, every claim they've made has been soundly and clearly refuted by actual experts, they just won't listen.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not saying there was fraud, personally, I think every corporatist and/or neolib politician in the West should be walled, in Minecraft of course, which is basically all of them at this point. Can't even vote for the more leftist parties down here, either because they're either too woke, or literal shills for the Chinese government.
Lumpens don't even know that every single party in my country has basically abandoned the working class.
Anyways cringe tangent schizo rant over.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Idk if you're American or what, but the election claims made here are shockingly stupid. They make no sense at all, like at all.
the Trump campaign showed up to court with their "eyewitnesses" and the claims ranged from "we saw an asian guy voting" to "someone called me a karen."
And keep in mind these are the ones they decided to take into court, so imagine how r-slurred the rest were.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Theyβre so fricking stupid itβs amazing.
They claim that China manufactured a bunch of fake ballots, and they were looking for bamboo fibers on the ballots as proof lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
π€π€π€π€π€
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Liar. How much is soros paying you pizza? Trust me, I speak from experience, no amount of soros bucks I worth selling your eternal soul to the blue devil.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Do you even read what you write, from sentence to sentence?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Refute a single thing said.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
:)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
You can do shit like ballot harvesting, where you go around and "help"
senile~~older and/or ~~dumbless fortunate people fill out ballots and then turn them in for them. This isn't actually illegal though depending on the state. Some states have reasonable limits like the ballot harvester has to be a relative or that the ballot harvester can only collect up to 10 ballots. Other states like California allow anyone to collect an unlimited amount of ballots from other people and turn them in, they are even allowed to be paid to so.Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Weβll have a reckoning over election fraud when rightoids grow the balls to cheat
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They've been cheating for years lmao. It's actually been proven in court multiple times, they're just good at framing it as "election security."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is your brain on
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
They aren't engaging in voter fraud, they're engaging in voter suppression and extreme gerrymandering.
It's cheating, just not in the way most people understand.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Who isnβt doing some form of voter manipulation? Dems bus urban youth in from the crackhouses and homeless shelters, and rightoids stop them from registering same day. And Maryland is the ugliest gerrymandered state youβve ever seen.
This is how the game is played Pizza stop being mad when you lose.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No they literally do not, this has literally no basis in reality. The entire "bussing" meme makes no coherent sense, if anyone was bussing voters around there'd be a huge paper trail.
Maryland also isn't even actually gerrymandered to any real extent, this is a common misconception where people confuse how the lines look with a full blown gerrymander.
To put this into perspective for you:
This isn't even getting into the fact dems want gerrymandering illegal on a federal level, Republicans do not. The DNC has to gerrymander at this point because you can be sure Republicans will, even so, democrats do it to a much lesser extent:
Republican gerrymandering is far more common, far more extreme, and anti-gerrymandering laws are primarily opposed by Republicans, not democrats. Many democratic states have ceded re-districting powers to bipartisan commissions even, because they're r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Neighbor Iβm bussing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
pizzashill moment
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, but literally requesting racial voter data and amending your laws specifically to remove alternative IDs used by black voters is in fact racial voter suppression:
1
There was also a leak that exposed a republican gerrymandering figure, surprise surprise, it was race based:
The issue isn't ID requirements - it's that they aren't trying to put in place actual ID requirements, they're just trying to blindside and suppress as many voters as they can because their policy agenda is unpopular and they know that it is unpopular.
For the record, I don't even think this is an effective suppression tactic, it's the intent that makes it very clearly racist.
And for the final nail in the coffin, Republicans rejected a voter rights bill that included a national voter ID system:
Why? I'll let you guess.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
^ the virgin "high information" voter
Since I have a job, I will keep this brief:
gerrymandering is a meaningless term until you can define what a "fair" district is.
of course repubs aren't getting on board with Dem national legislation you r-slur
noooo it's impossible to get an ID from the DMV noooooo
don't respond, won't read your links anyway
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There are numerous ways to do this, the efficiency gap for example:
1
Why? Why are they so hostile towards voting rights?
Not what was said bud.
Translation: I got dunked.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The only efficiency gap here is the efficiency of my posts to yours. 1 letter to your 20
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Try to avoid engaging your superiors on topics you know nothing about in the future.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
That's not what those say. It's actually the other way around, and the data proves it. Might want to read your links again.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not even sure what grand form of r-sluration this is, but I've read literally all of it, and all of it supports my argument.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Read closer.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Our elections are completely secure, dipshit rightoid. Frick off.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Of course election fraud happened. It always happens. And that's a good thing. r/LoveForElectionFraud when?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
He was and is extremely popular. The thing is, he was so hated, that a LOT of people were motivated enough to go and vote against him. His constant trolling backfired.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is pizzashill bait
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
lmao Eva! I remember him. I think he got banned right before Jan 6 and disappeared.
eta: iirc, he made bets and then got sitewide banned for jew hate and disappeared.
Krayon sexually assaulted his sister.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Idk but that might be the best username ever lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This but unironically
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Even worse, I was born in California!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Trump not winning Cali is the most obvious sign of manipulation there could have been, but Iβm sure your broke butt is still eager to get paid
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Trump. Won.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I am not sure which is more cringey, the litany of erroneous assumptions you splayed out or the act of calling upon the student archetype with the intent of derision. Anti-intellectualism, check.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Canβt believe Pizzatard made an entire sneedpost about me. Iβve really made it! Downvoted with love.
Thanks for this beautiful display of autism bby.
Me on the right btw:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm eva.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Post twink nudes to prove it or GTFO
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No thank you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yeah AFAIK they're the same user.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Pizza sneedanddox because he got in an argument with someone that demanded that THEY accept the premise that "conservatives dominate social media".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Literally jut a basic fact about reality, supported by overwhelming proof.
And no, I think he might be eva because he's very clearly an extreme r-slur.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's definitely common knowledge and every conservative's experience that social media is for them and them alone. Leftoids just getting banned all the time like flies.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why are you trying to engage in this weird strawman? Here, let's try this, we're going to walk you into reality.
Is it true or false that the largest political pundits on social media are conservatives?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Since when are "political pundits" proof that social media is a conservative haven?
But no, it's not true.
https://businessinsider.com/democratic-republican-congress-twitter-followings-political-support-2019-2?op=1
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes it is, we aren't talking about elected officials, we're talking about political pundits - the media. The fact you just tried to pull this leads me to believe you know you're wrong and are now leaning into straight r-sluration.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We're actually talking about the broad concept of "social media". You didn't specify political pundits.
You said "conservatives dominate social media".
That's so laughably untrue it's unbelievable except that it's you saying it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes I literally did specify pundits r-slur:
1
It is objectively true by every metric:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You did it AFTER you made your overly broad laughable statement in order to try to yank some kind of a win out of it, r-slur.
It's like you made a statement like "women really dominate the sports world."
And the other party said, "Fam...no...sports tends to be really a male-centric thing..." and you go, "Whaddabout Venus and Serena and women's gymnastics..."
Quotes nakedly partisan pollutico hit piece again.
https://investors.com/politics/editorials/social-media-trump-conservative-bias/
https://pewresearch.org/politics/2020/10/15/differences-in-how-democrats-and-republicans-behave-on-twitter/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
heβs my boyfriend and i have s*x with him
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
T or B?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
B π€€
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Based
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context