Unable to load image

Black chief diversity officer lost his job for flagging microaggrassions. On reddit it's Navis vs. Commies vs. Soys vs. grifter enthusiasts. Who will manage to be most offended and/or correct?

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/qimb49/a_black_chief_diversity_officer_lost_a_job_offer/?sort=controversial

A lot of what we're seeing in this story goes to the heart of the white rage monster thing we're seeing at school boards over "critical race theory" and the general blowback against racial justice initiatives.

:marseyagree:

36
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

chances are it'll be a white liberal

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

White libbies really need to be culled. :marseynightmare:

I wonder what caused that abrupt shift around 2012-2014. I'm blaming soy until further evidence is shown.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

intentional political-media seeding of race determinist theories as a backlash to the legitimately threatining occupy wall street movements in the shadow of the 2008 recession. also obama.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Really? And that shift happened exactly 4 to 6 years later? Doesn't make sense.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've tried to work this out for years. The most grating, annoying language explodes in 2014 (think "whiteness" as abstract concept,) partly it could genuinely have been born in trying to make leftist meme headlines go viral with the much larger Daily Mail tabloid audience. So it started at rightwing trash fodder. Me and my friend have shared headlines under the premise "this is dumb" since then, but not really before (lefty media just boring; and easily beat by Daily Mail, which was the biggest paper in the world in terms of clicks, way back in 2010.)

Journos could have literally been hired for being dumb; that's what gets clicks. I mean--certainly seems to be the world we are living in. People "hated" Gawker journos in 2009 for breaching norms and being rude and scummy, but nobody said "these people are stupid." Yet we "hate" journos now because they seem intellectually subhuman (possibly what they were hired for!)

I trace it back to Cancel Colbert girl getting millions of hits; she proved giving the dumbest girl in class with the hottest take was a bona fide tabloid goldmine. Why not just hire some people like her? Clickbait theory of clownworld evolution, not sure how accurate I ever was, about this stuff. Only people who seemed to have similar analysis was South Park guys, in that one series of episodes about sentient ads. They are pretty sharp.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The other commenter was right. OWS was ground zero. Look up the 'progressive stack' which pissed off and alienated the core of the group which did the most work.

You already know who was responsible for that one.

:marseyglow:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean I don't think it's that hard to figure out. As economic issues became more front and center in the post-2008 era the elite political class decided to start weaponizing issues like this to keep people distracted.

The reason this became so popular amongst upper-class white liberals is that it allows them to attack the "system" and signal virtue to their own social class without ever actually enaging in meaningful change or giving up anything of value.

When some upper-class white liberal is waxing poetic about "white privilege" and "racial injustice" it allows for self-criticism without ever actually engaging in real self-criticism.

Declaring yourself "privileged" on the grounds of your skin color doesn't require anything to remedy outside of acknowledging your privilege - declaring yourself privileged on economic grounds requires yourself to engage in activities that might harm your material conditions in the long run, which is not something your average narcissistic white upper class liberal will do.

Republicans had been at this for years before liberals were - except in the context of self-reliance. Liberals know the system is rigged, they just don't want to identify the correct reasons why because it'd harm their own conditions if they did.

Republicans depend on denying that the system is rigged to trick poor people into voting against their own economic interests. The entire concept of "self-reliance" serves this mission very well.

Humans are not self-reliant creatures, the concept is completely foreign to us. But through some verbal witchcraft conservatives convince lower cllass poor white people that they too will one day be wealthy as long as they keep cutting taxes on the rich.

It really is genius.

I'd also like to point out that OWS was a flash point as others have said, but this has existed for long before OWS, always bubbling beneath the surface, all it needed was a crack.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's nice sweaty. Why don't you have a seat in the time out corner with Pizzashill until you calm down, then you can have your Capri Sun.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The libs you are complaining about have their values founded in logic and reason

Educate yourself.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wow this pizza post is actually good!

:marseyhmm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

See, pinkoids? This guy uses his brain.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's nice sweaty. Why don't you have a seat in the time out corner with Pizzashill until you calm down, then you can have your Capri Sun.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Good job summoning him LPB

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you intentionally seed anything it will happen exactly x to y years later...

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I too love vague "predictions."

:marseyangel:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"exactly 4 to 6 years later"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why exactly 4 to 6 years later? Why not earlier or later? Because it's a vague "prediction" from a reeeetarded rightoid.

There's also the causal process underlying the pinkoid's claim.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The stupidpol overlap here makes it so hard to tell what part of these threads are bait vs :marseyjones: .

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

you said it, not the other duderino

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That was your assessment. Nobody said "the CIA spread x for the purpose of causing y exactly z years later", they said "the CIA spread x for the purpose of causing y and it happened to take around z years to become effective in the mainstream discourse as you can see from this chart"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

White independants agree/disagree both trending downward.

Blackpill Gang

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

after floyd/reading kendi/diangelo?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have no I idea, the Chauvin verdict was in April but that doesn't seem like it should change answers to this question that much. Maybe the CRT stuff is a bigger deal than it seems.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

hopefully people are waking up to the lunacy, i've seen most sentiments on r/askaliberal leaning towards DEI being useless and performative. it sure is cancer, i wouldn't give a shit had parts of it not spread here

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Left is % agreeing, right is % disagreeing

I fricking hate journos so much

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As an American we have fought two Wars over this and so far the white supremacists are 0-2.

It really looks like they want to make 0 - 3...

I would be fine with DEI if we redefined "white supremacy" to just mean Germans

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think they meant the Civil War, not WWI. But I have a feeling if you interviewed some North Vietnamese, you could get some interesting opinions on black people.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh shit, the White Supremacists won the civil war

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That entire subreddit is a cesspool. It's like a sewer that empties directly into a stagnant pond.


Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I see you are familiar with r/news, Snappy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reddit being reasonable gives me strength and 5 minutes later some :marseytrain2: makes me lose

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oberti was also told by the company’s lawyer that it was uncomfortable with Hill inquiring about hiring staff to build his team; that Hill wanted a larger relocation budget; that he rented and charged a luxury car to the company; and that he was overall β€œtoo sensitive about race issues.”

lmao way to bury the lede. Peak journ*lism.

Nevertheless, I guess the implication is that there's no such thing as being "too sensitive about race issues"?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Diversity is good for business. After all, top tech companies are heavily diverse, if Midwest manufacturing companies hire πŸ€ they will be more profitable like Google!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.