None
Reported by:
105
I guess :marseyshrug: this is gwoodbye

It seems I have been fuwwy dwoxxed by swomeonye. Haven't wooked intwo it bc I dwon't want two get upset. Tbh I nyewer cared that much abwout dwoxxing because i am nyot racist :marseykkk: or hwomwophwobic or anything.

I was mainwy here just two make jwokes, the vast majwority of which were self-depwecating. I nyewer invited meta dwama or published anything :marseycoleporter: pwivate myself. This was an outlet fwor humwor fwor me. Life is hard enyough. I have onwy dated dwamatards since 2020 (Befwore that I was celibate :marseybetauprising: 5 years, mainwy due two cancer)….i just reawwy vibe with the sense of humwor here I guess. It was a wot mwore innyocent than peopwal think.

If it was Rdwama histworian, I dwo in fact fworgive u. U're pwetty ywoung and u'ww gwow with tim. I abswowlutewy dwon't hwowld a gwudge. It's just life. I knyow u've mentionyed mwe surviving cancer :marseyhitchens: but what I nyewer mentionyed is I have two separate pwositions where :marseydrama: I mentwor cancer :marseymetokur: patients (onye on onye and anyother with speeches abwout my experience at large :marseyslimeblue: fundwaising events). I reawwy dwo twy two give mwore than I take. I have mentionyed my tim in the hwospitwl fwor psych issues (stiww a pwetty gwave thing I'm gwoing thwough). I dwon't talk abwout hwow I reach out two thwose having pwoblems. U'd be surpwised what I've dwonye fwor peopwal & the genyewosity I've shwown, especiawwy outside :marseygrass: of this site.

If it was anyonye else, I stiww fworgive u. Life is twoo shwort two carry hatwed and bitternyess.

I twuwy had swo much fun on this site fwor the last cwoupwal of years. I hwope I bwought swome sunshinye and laughs two ywour life. I'm nyot vengefwl swo dwon't worry, I am letting this aww gwo twonyight.

None
None

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115644497554276.webp

:#marseynouautism:

Americans' fear of the even the slightest hint of sexuality is so insane to me. The fact that the left is more off putting than the right to the point you want the opponent disqualified is just otherworldly to me.

>Americans are... LE BAD

:#soyjakferal:

None
None
None
13
Is it immoral to let people live a lie if they think they are happy? : philosophy

https://old.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/12jiwu0/we_never_stopped_seeking_immortality_our/?sort=controversial

β€œSpiritual meaning” is a coping mechanism for people to avoid having to face personal responsibility. We don't need that. I mostly just answered in that way since β€œone could argue” is to most bland statement one can give though. Yeah, sure, argue then.

scientists literally create tiny doughnut shaped stars and bombs that annihilate cities How sad, these simpletons don't understand that their myths are just another in a long line of arbitrary belief systems smh

Well one of my key midterm lifegoals is immortality

Suddenly the athiests get all offended when u call transhumanism the new religion

https://old.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/165ayce/in_the_modern_world_the_comfort_afforded_by_the/?sort=controversial

Just don't think about it, bro. Ignore death! Great advice, never thought of that one \s

why? i do not believe meta-physics even exists, its all physicalism. show me one thing that is impossible to measure weigh and categorise, ill wait. all you will be able to demonstrate is that we cant do it yet. all of human history is evidence that literally everything is weighable, measurable, categorisable with sufficiently advanced tools it just stuns me that we have gone from thinking flies and frogs arise from foul air just 500 years ago to sending shit outside our own solar system and modifying our own genes and yet there are people who think we cant weigh the 'supernatural' when 90% of what we take for granted would be considered unholy witchcraft for most of humanities history.

if we continue on our current trajectory without killing ourselves we will be able to do literally anything.

B-word your science cant even determine why red is red

β€œScience cannot explain everything and thus a life of faith is still possible.” Science will however continue to chase that belief down smaller and smaller holes as it discovers more about the universe. Soon your entire spirituality will be based on a vanishingly small set of things you believe science has no answer to.

THE HECKING SCIENCE WILL GIVE ME AN OBJECTIVE VIEW OF COMPLICATED, SUBJECTIVE VALUES AND EXPERIENCES CHUD

i blows my mind that anyone can state that we cannot know X. what they mean is we cannot know X yet. all of human history shows me can weigh, measure and catergorise literally anything with sufficiently advanced tools.

"girls cant say my peepee is small yet until they read my 50 peer reviewed studies"

these people are supposed to be philosophers yet dont believe in metaphysics of any sort

btw post history ofc.:

oh what has the US done? Just killed 10 million people since the 60s over money and ideology, regime changed over 50 nations indirectly killing millions more and regime changing actual democratic governments (they should know that no one is allowed to nationalise energy resources). they also spy on everything that moves and helped fund the Brexit 'leave' side and rolled Australias PM back in the 70s for daring to get non-US loans. then we have the actions of US corporations (which run the US government) shit like Bhopal, killing 16,000 people due to being cheap and every other instance of corporations fricking either foreigners or US citizens. i think America is just as bad as China, killing over 10 million people for money and ideology vs china killing over 2 million to steal their organs. both are actions of evil, evil governments.

Called it years back, Labor would present a properly neo-liberal budget once elected. cant wait for the next round of predictable excuses from the Labor-philes, 'they promised' 'wait until next term' 'media would shred them' et-fricking-c. anyone who still believe in Labor at this point is either completely self-absorbed and loving the middle and upper class hand outs or they have stockholm syndrome are simply incapable of critical thought. every time they are in power they are more and more right wing economically and its going to destroy this nation and turn us into a clone of a fricking shithole, America.

lol so only some kinds of legal bribery would be allowed. frick me you lot are hilarious. why not ban donations from anyone anywhere entirely? have each party get set funding from the tax department. allowing anyone to donate money is allowing corruption.

[–]VitriolicViolet 0 points 4 years ago yeah. i get sick of futurologys bizarre optimismthat tech will give us a utopia. It wont, virtually every tech advance in human history has been used to make the ruling class more dominant, not to reduce inequality. Naive optimism, tech dystopia is staggeringly more likely than utopia. to achieve utopia we would have to fundamentally alter the entire species way of viewing the world and tech does not do that

40 k reddit karma in six years

A schizophrenic is "given" their delusions. What makes yours special just because it has a religious flavor?

To suggest some random stranger has schizophrenia is very rude and disrespectful. I don't know why you thought that was a kind thing to say

I'm conceptually comparing religious faith to schizophrenia, because they're comparable.

So, rather than being some sort of metaphorical sheep, we should just in fact be actual sheep now. LOL

I personally find comfort in knowing that we'll all die and that nothing matters in the end. Accepting what I can't change makes me more appreciative of the present. My fascination with death is part of what keeps me grounded in my day to day life.

I used to go down rabbitholes of research into possible explanations of why or what's our purpose for being here. It would always lead to a lot of anxiety and ultimately depression. Now I think, "I don't know, and I know that I won't ever know the reason for being here. But I do know that I am a human being whose been given a chance to experience life, so might as well make the best out of it. If all for naught, then oh well. At least I can say I tried to make the best out of everything."

Some people need the crutch religion provides. It helps them to feel less alone and feel as if they have a purpose and later a place to be welcomed for all of eternity. Without it there would be more depression and crime. Crime because some believe enough in their God to stay on the straight and narrow. The rich and powerful benefit from the obedience religion provides, so they're going to continue beating that drum.

Or people can just believe in an afterlife. Who cares if it isn't verifiable or provable?

Your idea that an afterlife is comforting is entirely subjective. You also fail to realize that one cannot entirely give way to β€œ the third path β€œ without confronting his own mortality. Memento Mori Man has two lives, and the second only begins once he realizes he has just one.

There's nothing about science that disproves the afterlife. That's scientism, the merging of dogmatic views with empirical evidence and its study. Many metaphysics can fit the same data, and give a different Interpretation as to what is going on even as the body rots and the person seems long gone. Heck, even physicalism is compatible with the idea of reincarnation, for example. Like, if there could be Boltzmann brains, your brain could pop back up into existence in the future, just by chance alone. Same if there is something like eternal inflation. Death could just be your consciousness hopping into another body, if consciousness was information, that is, with the information being teleported (or perfectly copied), as we now know is theoretically possible (as long as no cloning theorem is respected, which is ok cuz you just died). And that's just within the metaphysics that is more commonly associated with nothingness after death. There's many more.

Yes but since you cannot verify it, those influenced by the scientific method can never fully believe in it. With enough fanaticism, they may be able to deceive themselves into believing it, like many christians do by choosing some pseudo scientific proof. Judging by how fervently some of them argue for a scientific Christianity and a proof of god, they must be very insecure in their beliefs. Western spiritualism is on its last legs and has been constantly declining since the enlightenment.

Western spirituality may not be in its last legs, but it is due some massive reformation. Personally, the thing I dislike about religion most is not its potentially fantastical aspects, I can roll with that. The thing that irks me is how it rules by both carrot and stick. How it manipulates people and denies their own individuality and capacity for self-determination through threat of punishment. I find that abhorrent. But, on the topic of not being able to know, the issue goes both ways. The idea that we go poof after we die is equally fantastical to the idea we go to heaven with skydaddy. I mean it. Consider something as simple as anesthesia. Can you know, with any degree of certainty, just based on the empirical data, whether a person who goes under is truly unconscious instead of just inmobile, unresponsive and without the capacity to form new memories? You can't, and there is absolutely no test for that. The only way to "know" is to interpret what you see based on your own personal worldview, and to delve into metaphysics and philosophy, to take axiomatic assumptions, quite outside the scope of empirical observation and even science. And there is no guarantee that your beliefs about what is going there are any better than those of the fundamentalist christian, for the same reason one cannot logically disprove solipsism or being a brain in a vat, or the demiurge (or cartesian demon). It's faith all the way down.

It certainly goes both ways, but non believers are also those who simply dont know. The statement, that the existence and non existence of after life are equally likely, leads to an ad absurdum argument. Inductively adding other equally likely states after death leads to a zero probability for each event and therefore a null likelihood of an after life existing. Your argument does not work.

I'm not making some dumb "Pascal's Wager" type argument here. I said equally fantastical, not equally likely. And you are indeed correct that a probabilistic consideration of all the possibilites, while having to assign equal likelyhood to all, renders any idea one has of the afterlife infinitely unlikely, basically 0 chance. There is an infinite pool of possibilities here, after all, from nothing to being the pinky toe of an eternally dancing mayan deity. But eternal nothing, that is, the void the materialists usually expects, is only one of those, not 2 or 3 or a million, and certainly not infinity. So by that same (botchy) logic, one could argue that there is an infinitely higher likelyhood of something else happening, whatever else. But, as I said, it is botchy logic, because the thing about total uncertainty is that you simply can't assign probabilities so willy nilly (among other potential issues with the "math" above). You just don't know, period. You don't even know if accepting you don't know is the right thing to do in the face of it, or if it will save you or doom you, because, well, you don't even know the ultimate consequences of your actions. You know nothing, zilch, nada. So, in the face of total uncertainty, why is agnosticism better than faith? Any argument you make would have to appeal to present circumstances, as knowledge of the future in question is prohibited. There is no "for the future of humanity and progress", or for "truth's sake", or whatever else. Here is simply the domain of complete uncertainty, in where, as you die, you may realize this "human life" was nothing but a dream, or you may just relive your present life endlessly, or you may vanish and suffer no consequences for your life as you lived it, deluded or not, or who knows what: here be dragons. Anyone is free to do with that as they so wish. And if you disagree, I'm all ears, but I doubt you have anything that could surprise me. After all, I'm not arguing for any specific possibility, but the opposite.

None
9
This is what they want to keep from the average american citizen
None
10
Ricky Stanicky (2024)

Semi entertaining/funny movie. 2.5/5 :marseystar:

The main purpose of this post is to ask:

DAE feel like Zach Efron is starting to look not real

https://media.giphy.com/media/kVmzd3RxKqaT5Rm16e/giphy.webp

!nooticers

None
11
Eurobeat song about 9/11, nothing I ask it to make even comes close to this (chorus at 0:40)
None
4
2024 minimum height difference
None
Reported by:
47
I guess this is goodbye

It seems I have been fully doxxed by someone. Haven't looked into it bc I don't want to get upset. Tbh I never cared that much about doxxing because i am not racist or homophobic or anything.

All of you should fricking KEEP YOURSELVES SAFE. I forgive no one you're all r-slurred

None
None
7
Seal pup
None
6
Gay = P-do

The Spartacus International Gay Guide is an international gay travel application and formerly an annually-published guide.[1] It was founded by John D. Stamford in 1970 as a printed guide, before being bought by Bruno GmΓΌnder in 1987 following investigations into Stamford's tax violations and promotion of paedophilia. It was sold to current owners GayGuide UG in 2017, whereupon the guide became digital only, with the printed version ceasing publication.[2]


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1556756/

Using phallometric test sensitivities to calculate the proportion of true p-dophiles among various groups of s*x offenders against children, and taking into consideration previously reported mean numbers of victims per offender group, the ratio of heterosexual to homosexual p-dophiles was calculated to be approximately 11:1. This suggests that the resulting proportion of true p-dophiles among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater than that in persons who develop heterosexually. This, of course, would not indicate that androphilic males have a greater propensity to offend against children.

This suggests that the resulting proportion of true p-dophiles among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater than that in persons who develop heterosexually.


Should homosexuality be an executable offense? :carpmeatgrinder:

None
None
45
[Effort post] [OC stats] - Rocket Daddy finally succumbs to the dog pill

It's raining pibbles. In case you're concerned about what the above image represents, let's start this post by clearing the air with this reply to Elon's dog, sorry pibble-pilled post:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115678942600262.webp

That explains it sufficiently. The parachuting velvet hippos in the above image love kids. The Lord, in his infinite wisdom, provides.

With that out the way, let's get to the main matter of this post which is Elon has finally taken the dog pibble pill:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115680294626887.webp

The double exclamation mark says it all. Elon can't wait to tell the world that such dogs are genetically inclined that way, stirring the hornet's nest. We've heard it all before, but a few include:

What a lie! All animals have their own personality. The owner needs to assess the mannerisms. Lord, would one do the same evaluation about human breeds. Wtf

......

It's 100% the owner. And more specifically a certain culture of a certain demographic of owners. But feel free to come and try to take my dog from me.

.....

Junk Statistics - https://www.avma.org/resources-tools/pet-owners/dog-bite-prevention/why-breed-specific-legislation-not-answer

I found that last reply to Elon's anti-pibble crusade most enlightening. Who more qualified than the American Vetinary Medical Association to inform us:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711567894763025.webp

End of.


None of the above makes this post qualify as an effort post, but I think you'll find the below chart I compiled does. I don't think I've ever seen an extensive collection of dogs sorted by death/maim rate with per capita taken into account, so I took the source of Ian Miles Cheong's post / Elon's repost and found the study linked here. Unfortunately, Ian's post (and others) never seem to bother with "per capita" (even though it would help their cause!), so I made sure to factor that into the stats.

Anyway, I took all the stats from the study and compiled them into a spreadsheet:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1711567894856835.webp

The orange titled columns I extrapolated and added myself. Deaths are more important than maimings, so I gave them a semi-arbitrary factor of 5x in weighting. For that crucial per capita, I divided the evilness/violence stats by the breed percentage of the total dog population, and stretched all numbers to start from one, to arrive at the final "Dog Evilness Per Capita Normalized" stat.

From here, I created a table to show the least dangerous breed, to the most dangerous:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17115678954218402.webp

And will you have a look at that, the most dangerous breed is around 2000, I REPEAT TWO THOUSAND times more likely to injure/kill someone than the least dangerous. I stretched the chart so that the innocent Greyhound and Pug (joint safest) were given a SINGLE PIXEL of height to their name. These bars are not exaggerated - they are real, at least to the extent that we can trust the original study.

Yay to Greyhounds, Pugs, Pointers, Poodles, Portuguese water dogs and Border collie terriers.

Boo to Pit bulls, Bull mastiffs, Rottweilers, Akitas, Dobermans and Malamutes.

I'm a little surprised Border Collies were rated so far down at 26.4x base, but even they are around 76x safer than the pits.

There's one other thing to consider for now:

I find the 6% stat a little hard to believe when there are FIVE different breeds that are considered pit bulls. American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, American Bully, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, and sometimes the American Bulldog.

So one of those five "pit types" may be better or worse than the other four.

None
6
Wizard Beer - YouTube
None
13
Good Times: :niggaplease: version
None
None
14
:marseybingus: :pepegun:
None
8
r/parenting
None
18
Drowned Italian and Israeli glowies were on a secret mission :marseyspyglow:

Apparently they were hanging out on a yacht on Lake Maggiore on the Italy-Switzerland border as cover for spying on Russian-owned properties. The boat capsized in bad weather. Why they needed to have 25 people on the boat is a bit baffling. Maybe they hired a bunch of hookers with their Mossad credit card.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.