Foids Attempt To Use Math To Justify Cucking

The 20-30% positive-ratio comes from the studies that analyze the results of paternity tests, not the paternity results of all married men.

This is a totally reasonable critique. You'd need a random sample.

>In the UK 20% of men are unknowingly raising children that are not biologically theirs.

One in five seems awfully low.

https://www.dnatestingclinics.co.uk/almost-half-of-uk-men-who-take-a-paternity-test-turn-out-not-to-be-the-real-father/

It's actually 51% of UK men who take a paternity test who are not the real father at this point.

I never understood why you wouldn’t do it just to make sure they didn’t switch babies at the hospital or whatever. I don’t see the big deal

They didn't even use math well. Here's how you do it:

Let's say just 0.5% of children are being raised by men that incorrectly believe themselves to be said child's father. The number might be higher than that, but there's no way it's lower than 1/200, so we're lowballing here, helping out the "don't do a paternity test" side of the argument.

The average cost of raising a child in America, from birth to adulthood, is ~$300,000. Let's say, for the sake of argument, that the father pays half of that, $150,000. Men typically have a higher income than women, so it might be more than half, but there's a lot more single mothers raising kids than single fathers raising kids, so it evens out. There's also instances of the state paying, rather than the parents, but that's difficult to account for, so we're just using "half the costs" because it's convenient and close enough.

$150,000/200 is $750. So if a paternity test costs $750 or less, it is, by the numbers, a bad financial decision not to have one done. A quick bit of Googling suggests that an at-home paternity test costs, at most, $200, and a court admissable paternity test done at a lab or hospital costs, at most, $500. The exception is prenatal paternity tests, which cost quite a bit more. But since the combined cost of an at-home test and a proper lab test is, at most, $700, it would be financially irresponsible to not do an at-home test and follow up with a lab test if need be.

Or you could avoid all this nonsense and stop fricking foids, you degenerate straggots.

Even if he found out that he wasn't biologically his, it wouldn't change their relationship. I think it would just be deep anger toward my mom if my brother found out.

So Deep. Very Anger.

If I found out my son was not my own, I would put my wife feet first through a wood chipper.

if you only x-ray people with really sore legs, and you find that 50 percent have a broken bone, you can't extrapolate that to say that 59 per cent of people have a broken leg. This is called selection bias. Basically, the reason that they ask for a test is very important in interpreting the actual population statistic based on the sample.

This is actually correct (setting aside the obvious typo of typing "59" instead of "50") but glaringly incomplete. If you have data like this, the correct conclusion is that 50 percent of people with really sore legs have a broken leg. Bringing this back to the original question of paternity, the data suggests that 20-30% of men who are suspicious enough to seek a paternity test are right to be suspicious. In other words, if you're suspicious to begin with, and you're an inferior bong, then there's a good chance you're right.

Only foids could be so evil as to make a man raise another man's children

I'd unironically murder a b-word in minecraft if that happened to me tbh

Even thinking about it makes me seethe

LMAO you think biofoids are visiting 2x?

Snapshots:

• undelete.pullpush.io

• archive.org

• archive.ph (click to archive)

• ghostarchive.org (click to archive)

Shit like this is why I am glad that I am gay.

Genetic testing should be the norm when u have kids. Confirm paternity but also screen for genetic predispositions to diseases. Foids dont really have a good argument against it.

It's definitely really high but we can't say exactly how high. If there was a big push to start paternity testing though, the government would ban it like France did. Everyone knows a big chunk of men are raising someone else's kids, but if it comes out in the open society would basically crumble and the government has a vested interest in preventing that