Unable to load image

When Americans Lost Faith in the News | The New Yorker

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/02/06/when-americans-lost-faith-in-the-news

Alternative title: The thirstiest auto-fellatio you'll read all year

The author is Louis Menand, a highly educated boomer liberal, a writer, an award winning journ*list who reported on the Cold War.

Indeed, he's seen it all. There's hardly anyone better positioned to write this article. There's hardly anyone left with the breadth and depth of his professional experience.

So why have people lost faith in journ*lism? Perhaps he'll write on the changing approach to journ*lism of the younger professionals. Perhaps he'll write on the thinly veiled activism often disguised as journ*lism. Perhaps he'll talk about cancel culture and social media and how this new invention has parasitized journ*lism.

But unfortunately for you, like many in his category, Drumpf completely and utterly broke him.

Obligatory Drumpf is literally Hitler article.

Let's see what he instead blames for the Inversion of the Trust Thermocline:

Yes I'm being flippant with some of these points, but Louis our dear friend legitimately and unironically made those last two point, straight up.

Thanks Drumpf, we're never going to trustworthy news, are we?

210
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jfc bro literally made it two sentences before he decided it was the orange man who destroyed the journos' credibility.

:#marseybudddwyer:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In a sense he's right- mainstream media was so mindbroken by Trump they decided to shred their credibility in order to attack him.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I remember when that dude, Jason something whatever, got fired from the NYT for plagiarism like 20 years ago and what a big deal it was. If that same shit happened today I think it would just get memory-holed and dude probably wouldn't even lose his job. There's like 3 journos that actually still do their job and aren't just mouthpieces, Glenpai, Bussy, and Taibbi (who weirdly we don't have a cute name for). The rest should go to Leafistan and :marseymaid3:.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Glennpai has a tendency to believe everything Russia and China says which is a tad disappointing. So I view him has a useful counterweight, but not a reliable sourse in and of himself.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think that's fair, I just appreciate he's not part of the hive. It's so blatantly obvious when new firmware goes out and they're all posting the same shit word for word on twitter and then they all write the exact same article but I just have to remember, no bait is too obvious.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's so blatantly obvious when new firmware goes out and they're all posting the same shit word for word on twitter

Oh come on, don't pretend that Glennpai and the "libertarian" chud crew don't do the same thing.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I guess I just don't pay them enough mind to notice. They're libertarians, they sit at the kids table with the anarchists.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I agree with them regarding intelligence agencies and the "National Security State".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I did end up taking an L on the Russian invasion but I just immediately go “glowie fake news” whenever I hear a new firmware update about shithole country wars.


Follower of Christ :marseyandjesus: Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

t. glennwald derangement syndrome.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I remember him 20 years ago when he was an extreme-left grifter who hated America and loved Russia. The two things that have been consistent his whole career. Let me know which other based conservative patriots I should be worshipping now. Maybe Jane Fonda?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Glenn isn't pretending to be any sort of conservative though.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

see above

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Glennpai is good as long as you remember his worldview is "America bad". So he does simp for smelly dictatorships a bit too much.

But Barry O did try to have him abducted and dismembered in a CIA black site for his Snowden reporting, so I give him a pass on a personal level, even if I don't agree with his global politics takes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He didn't get fired for plagarism or not praising trans lives matter enough. Jayson Blair got fired for straight-up making up stories.

:#reposthorse:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao that's right, so it really was exactly like it is now. Bro was an innovator and deserves an award.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@911roofer got upvoted on reddit for saying trans lives matter @911roofer never thought he would be the model journ*lists would aspire to.

:#reposthorse:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The thing that got Blair in trouble was writing demonstrable lies. J-slurs are allowed and implicitly encouraged to mislead readers by cherry-picking true facts to support a false narrative. This is functionally equivalent to a lie, but as long as no specific factual claims can be proven false, they get a pass.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Taibi wears hats

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Glenns a funny one as a Brazilian.

During operation carwash he was hated by the right as he exposed one of the main judges involved in op carwash as basically wanting fame and political power.

Nowadays he's hated by the left because he supports freedom of speech and he denounces one of our judges of the supreme court... As wanting fame and political power.

Lefties now say he's a far right figure paid by the CIA (unironically).

Tldr: wingcuckery is r-slurred

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

who is Bussy? Jesse Singal?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'll never forget two scoops

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I loved the time Washington Post ‘fact checked’ orange man on his claim that he had “burgers stacked a mile high” at a fast food buffet (funny enough on its own) for a college football team that came to the White House.

https://www.barstoolbets.com/blogs/1196337/washington-post-fact-checks-donald-trump-claim-he-piled-hamburgers-a-mile-high-for-clemson

If I fact checked that and called myself a journ*list I’d :marseycontemplatesuicide:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

mainstream media was so mindbroken by Trump

One example of this that's totally open in black and white is the PBS Newshour. They had a policy of always presenting both sides of a debate, which could be really infuriating when one side (usually Republicans) were just completely shameless and full of shit and had no real arguments to make. Then in the Trump era this becomes totally untenable because Trump was too demented and lazy to even have any coherent policy to argue for, so they started just pretending the Democrats' side.

If you're incredibly naive you might expect that when Trump is out of office they would go back to normal. Of course they don't. They expand this policy to all issues. So when there's a fight in Palestine, they bring in Aaron David Miller to present the Israeli side of it and nobody on the Palestinian side. Which is especially hilarious since one of Trump's only consistent policies was 100% commitment to Netanyahu.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Trump's only consistent policies was 100% commitment to Netanyahu

:!chadjew#:

Das rite

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I find the establishment lied more than drumpf did, but I think it’s just a perspective thing. I know ur a leftist that sympathizes with them, but you need to realize the system is completely broken. There is no good side

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I find the establishment lied more than drumpf did

The real dynamic is that the right lies more but is open about it, and the left lies less but claims to be neutral. Think Fox News vs CNN. It comes down to how much do you hate hypocrisy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That’s the wing cuck view. The uniparty is about the same all around, there are just a few figures outside of the establishment that make them seethe. These are the folx rad centrists should support imo

(Edit sadly they all support Israel)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They really started shredding their credibility in the 90s culture wars, this was just a more blatant iteration of the same phenomena.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Matt Taibbi has a great talk on this:

Now back to drama you fcking chodes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>one hour of a bald talking

but for real now, can you give a quick tldr about the vid?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Trumps election caused the non-Fox news stations to move from a model attempting to be balanced to actively, obviously and purposefully opposing him. It's financially better for them, and they think there's a moral case for it, too.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

heres a screenshot of trends in media-trust, CLEARLY the downward trend started in 2016 and not anytime before.

![](/images/16754811706929371.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I do enjoy the precipitous drop among republicans in 2016 though, mirrored by the obscene rise among democrats :marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i like the bump for independants and then a return to trend

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can understand relying on the media more because you didn’t like cheeto benito and the rethuglicans but how on earth did anyone’s trust in media increase? You’d have to wingcucked to the point of r-sluration to believe them more.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Republicans have a steep drop

>Independents have a more steady, but also drop

>Dems have an r-slured high increase

:#marseywrongthonk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The frick happened in 2018 too make trans lives matter believers start drinking the kool-aid?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They trust the media when the media is telling them exactly what they want to hear.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's like everyone's forgotten the Iraq War already. Jesus Fricking Christ, that's the foundation of most of American politics in this century.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What the frick are you talking about, what war in iraq, where even is that? DId you not see that he's orange, thats clearly bigger?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So all 3 saw a rise in the middle of 2018? What the heck happened?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i remember things being more chill politically in 2018 for some reason. not 2016 election, not directly post 2016 election, not pre2020 election yet. basically it was the 1 year we get off from this circus.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah it was sort or a chill vibe back then. The 2020 election season started with the Kavanaugh hearings.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>open link

>ctrl-f "trump"

>1/13

>close tab

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You need to learn how to interpret elite writing better. The author must mention Trump in the beginning to hook the reader, before pivoting to his actual subject (how the Cold War destroyed trust in journ*lism). So just scroll past the paragraphs that mention Trump

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

![](/images/16754759117553241.webp)

:marseyjourno::marseydead::marseydeathpose::!marseybloodpuddle::#marseymini:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As much as we (appropriately) shit on ourselves about Rightoid agendaposting this sort of post is a legitimately good take. rDrama occasionally attracts some smart people. You don't have to be a rightoid to see through these paper thin retroactive excuses pushed by the media.

Imagine congress trying to justify their perpetual 10% rating? You can be sure it would be packed full of 10yr child level excuses like this one.

![](/images/16754764133665192.webp)

It takes some arabs to hit NYC in order for people to respect the most basic politician in America. But when the journo's uncritically protects their bullshit (and the bullshit fed via federal agencies) like it's their own children it's oh-so-surprising when people start questioning the value of NYT/WaPo/New Yorker/Time/The Atlantic/etc to be the "defenders of democracy".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

rDrama attracts some smart people.

Yeah just waiting on the intelligence to rub off on me instead of the bad kind of autism...

Any day now...

:marseysweating:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

radical centrism :marseydisagree: hyper-cynical autism :marseyagreefast:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why not both? :marseyyesandno:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i am a proponent of “effective autism”

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I WILL MAKE YOU GAY

:#marseydramautist:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyawardretard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseycheerupretard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the perpetual 10% is explainable by people having slightly more trust for their local member and despising everyone else. It balances out.

If everyone hated their local MPs as much as national, the country would've been burned down yonks ago.


:#marseydarkpizzashill: The Democratic RethugliKKKan Party will collapse by 2030. :#marseydarkpizzashill:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Who needs objective truth when you're on the right side of history?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There is no objective truth :marseyfoucault:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Foucoult was too busy raping underage Tunisian boys to make any good points.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A true king :marseyhomofascist:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

zoz

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

zle

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

zozzle

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyfrenchvan:

There's a "Foucault raping children" Marsey.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

so that's not an objective truth? ok then ... :marseysmug2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#chadyes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's funny that he would jump to trump because he's one president too late.

Obama broke the media. They were so thrilled to have a smooth talking basketball as president, they decided he could do no wrong. Remember when they went to bat for him on the claim that he had a scandal free presidency? Completely absurd. They destroyed their own credibility during those eight years making the clear decision to abandon objectivity and become state propaganda. Orange man simply called them on it.

Journ*lists do have an agenda. Obviously, now more than ever. And, just as obviously, that agenda makes them untrustworthy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Onion broke during Obama. Instead of poking fun at the president, their favorite angle became "We don't deserve him!"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Same goes for the daily show and the like tbh. You can effectively chart the quality of a country’s chattering class by the quality of it’s satirists. I blame millenials starting to fill media positions during the Obummer presidency.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

decline basically started in 2003/5 for dems, for reps/ind it was earlier

![](/images/16754815617858796.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That 70 percent is bleak

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think (hope) part of that percentage is libtards just saying they trust journos to signal themselves as on the right side of history(tm). But tbqh I’m not sure if that’s better or worse.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They were so thrilled to have a smooth talking basketball as president, they decided he could do no wrong.

Absolute bullshit. Leftoid journos only know how to b-word and whine about whoever is in power and praise weaklings and victims. Did you ever see Rachel Maddow around 2008-2009? Literally every night she would whine about how he hadn't done anything for gays in the military yet. It was like Ted Koppel in 1979 counting the days since the hostages had been taken in Iran. Then there was the "drone strikes", a total bullshit non-issue that the left went into a rage about. Leftoids are utterly incapable of winning because as soon as one of them is succeeding, the rest just tear him down.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not talking about the ultra partisan talking heads like Maddow who are discontent for a living. I'm thinking more mainstream press, such as the following

  • David Brooks of the New York Times (“The Obama administration has been remarkably scandal-free”),

  • USA Today (“Obama has been a largely classy, mature and personally scandal-free presence in the White House”)

  • Paul Waldman in the Week (“Barack Obama will be president for less than eight more months, and he’s had only piddling little scandalettes.”)

Even the Wapo "fact check" that I pulled these from concludes:

  • As framed by Obama — “that hasn’t had a major scandal in the White House” — the claim is more narrow and could be deemed largely correct

This is obviously ridiculous, and anyone with a functioning frontal cortex during the obama years knows that it's ridiculous. Forget about what happened during his presidency, at the end it was his justice department lying to the fisa courts to manipulate the FBI into spying on his political opponent, arguably the most outrageous scandal in modern us history that has been mostly ignored by a media who spent the entirety of the trump presidency chasing their tails over nothingburger russiagate.

The distrust in the media is largely an own goal.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

David Brooks was not an Obama apologist. He was a Bush apologist. He did it on TV every Friday night for 8 years. His shtick was to say "Both sides are honorable, they both have good ideas. I must be a reasonable moderate since I say that. Now here's the reasons why we should invade Iraq, stay in Iraq, not negotiate with Iran, always support Likud in Israel, vote for everyone named Bush..." He was carrying the banner for the right wing at that time. You don't get to come to me now 20 years later and say that because rightoids have gone off the rails and have no values and are just openly about corruption and destroying society bolshevik-style that somehow this means you can retroactively make David Brooks a liberal in 2000-2008.

his justice department lying to the fisa courts to manipulate the FBI into spying on his political opponent

Trump was openly peepeelicking Putin. Putin, the DICTATOR OF RUSSIA. Like Brezhnev, Kruschev, Stalin, Lenin. Even if you believe he did nothing wrong, you have to admit it would be a scandal if there was not a counter-intelligence investigation into that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Trump referenced Putin in his dumb speeches and off prompter remarks, but as far as actual collab there was literally nothing there.

Meanwhile, Obama openly tells russia to save their shenanigans for his second term when he'd have more "leeway", mocks Romney for "1980s foreign policy" and then sits back and does literally nothing while russia steamrolls crimea.

You've got your presidents confused. Obama was soft on Russia. When it came time for actual policy, Trump actually broke with Obama's precedent and delivered lethal weaponry to Ukraine. If Trump won re-election there is zero chance that Ukraine is ever invaded, everyone with a brain understands that. But now we're dumping billions into one of the most corrupt countries in europe endlessly because suddenly the pronoun democrats have ukraine flags in their profile pics and we MU$T $AVE them!!!!

It's just truly remarkable how soft and ineffective obama and biden are at foreign policy. Ffs look up in the sky, might be looking at a china spy balloon if you live in the right state lmao. Wave to jinping, who actually owns biden and his son.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What shook me most from the media was their praise for Obama's aggressive war against Libya. The US could've choked France and the UK into into submission as they did with the Suez Canal Crisis, but it was just another cheerleading event, as opposed to their prior bitching and moaning about Dubya and the wars against Iraq and AFG (after their 'honeymoon' session of entertaining the absurdity of WMDs).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Obama's aggressive war against Libya

Imagine thinking that Obama invented Ghaddafi. Have you ever seen Top Gun? Nevermind, that would be before your time.

Do you know who Reagan was? Have the rightoids canceled him yet for opposing Russia? He bombed Libya because Ghaddafi was involved in horrible shit in Chad, Uganda, lots more places in Africa, the Philippines, Lebanon, etc. killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people. And he chimped out and killed American servicemen, and that's when the hammer got dropped on him.

I gotta add this to my list of the strange bedfellows of 2023 rightoids. It's not just SNCC, the Communist Party of the USA, the rioters at the 1968 Democratic Convention, it's also... literally Ghaddafi. :marseynotes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Those aren't relevant

The media was being hypocritical.

The Libyan war was more involved than a one week bombing campaign from the 80s. Gaddafi was removed from the US's list of states sponsoring terrorism prior to their invasion, so the rest of that tangent is irrelevant. He even warned the US publicly that the supposed moderates rioting in the streets (or democratic leaning protestors if you're the US media) were radical Islamists. Just look at the aftermath of the US-created collapse of that country.

I'm not a rightoid. You're just not thinking clearly. You completely overlooked how the media treated Dubya and his wars of aggression versus Obama and his wars of aggression. Admit it. Obama was a darling who could no wrong even though he was pulling the same shit his predecessors were. This speaks volumes as to the lack of integrity and obvious bias of media outlets.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Neither the UK, France or the US started a war in Libya, that war started itself. The west just decided to throw some support behind the rebels after the fact.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#brooksannoyed:

Mind boggling. Ming boggling.

I am not Darrell Brooks, I am a third party intervener, here on behalf of my client

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#brooksannoyed:

I AM A GROWN MAN WITH GROWN KIDS AINT NOBODY TELL ME WHEN TO TALK

I am not Darrell Brooks, I am a third party intervener, here on behalf of my client

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, don't reply like this, please do another wall of unhinged rant please.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think seeing the coverage on Obama as a teenager was the first time I started to :marseyhmmm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I legitimately think Obama was actually pretty great and that the biggest downside was it made every other BIPOC want to model their careers on Obama. Then when this didn’t work rather than admitting their own mediocrity/ acknowledging the political reality of there districts they pivoted to blaming white supremacy instead.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This was a pretty funny read after just finishing this deep dive into how journ*lists manufactured the “Russian collusion” narrative over the years since 2016:

https://www.cjr.org/special_report/trumped-up-press-versus-president-part-1.php

Reading that, then seeing this guys take on how it’s everyone’s fault but journ*lists that no one trust them:

:#marseylaugh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Didn't even mention G*mergate :marseykkkevil:. This journ*list clearly didn't do his research.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As our resident glowie apologist, I'd like to address the bitching and moaning about the CIA.

Revelations about the C.I.A.’s covert involvement in what were ostensibly non-governmental organizations began in 1966 :soycry:

Money to subsidize American college kids going to international student events, art exhibitions, etc. passed through the CIA. They didn't tell anyone what to say or do. Obviously the communists were paying their kids to go to these events and telling them exactly what to say and do. Like all the other shocking revelations of the 1960s, this was something the president had ordered them to do.

gave credentials to C.I.A. agents to use as cover in foreign countries

"CIA agents" every fricking time. :marseylaugh:

allowed reporters to be debriefed by C.I.A. officials

The horror. CIA interviews certain Americans returning from abroad and asks if they had any information they'd like to share. Does anybody think that Britain, France, Sweden, etc. doesn't do this? Why would this even be controversial? You want to see something dirty, look at how France set up MSF in the 1960s to smuggle weapons into Nigeria for them.

The Times seemed to feel that the issue was whether journ*lists who were involved with the C.I.A. wrote propaganda... [they didn't at all but I'm still butthurt]

What the frick would the issue be with journ*lists other than the risk of them getting subverted to write propaganda? This f-slur doesn't want to tell you the real reason why they forced the CIA to stop talking to journos. It was so that the journos could operate in communist countries without being harassed by their security services. It was all about making their lives easier and more comfortable.

Then he goes on to say that the hippies rioting at the Democratic National Convention in 1968 would have been really popular if the media was just more biased in their favor. :marseylaugh::marseylaugh::marseylaugh:

Rightoids, when you believe all the shit you hear about how horrible the glowies were in the 1950s-1960s, remember who made it up. You're on the side of the communists, the queers with gonorrhea, the long-haired freaks, the potheads, the Grateful Dead fans.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>t.glowie

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#taddance:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#soycry::#chadagent:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

downvoted for glowie apologism :#marseytom:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I honestly have no idea what you're talking about but it sounds based.

f-slur

I'm pretty sure you mean j-slur

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There's a lot of overlap. :marseyunamused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseypearlclutch2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyfedpostglow: < writing for The Examiner

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I’m no longer a glowie apologist after reading cia psychological operations in guerilla warfare, the manual given out to Nicaraguans.

So dumb bros


![](/images/16754859183949986.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are you legit r-slurred? The "Westmoreland Manual" was a KGB forgery. This has been known for decades.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hmm, what's your take on Operation Condor and the frickery CIA orchestrated here in South America?

:marseythinkorino:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This was stuff that the countries involved were doing. The CIA coordinated them communicating with each other but it didn't need to tell them to give helicopter rides. Argentina and Uruguay had really severe terrorist problems way beyond anything we've ever seen in America. People get mad after years of bombings and murders. Chile had even been taken over by the communists for several years. Allende "won" an election with something like 30% of the vote and then carried out a coup and began ruling as a dictator before he was overthrown. So all of these countries were way way more anti-communist than the CIA.

As for Pinochet's coup, the CIA had nothing to do with that and anyone who suggests otherwise is straight up lying. They did support preparations for another coup attempt years earlier but some Chilean r-slur fricked it up.

Again (this is a common theme) it was Nixon & Kissinger who ordered them to do this stuff. The CIA doesn't do covert action without the president's order. Chile especially is a case where Nixon had some weird fixation on the country and ordered them to do covert action there. That doesn't mean anyone in CIA thought it was a good idea.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Darn, you're really mad over this, but thanks for the effort you put into typing that all out! Sadly I won't read it all.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol I’m talking about the one with cia stamped all over it that the department admitted to producing (it was totally just one random lone wolf thing though, isolated event)


![](/images/16754869298909845.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If tRump lost the popular vote against Hillary and Biden, then why do Americans distrust j*urnos 🤮 at levels higher than Biden voters?

:#marseywrongthonk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

![](/images/16754836489357173.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Trump being an obvious r-slur with an attitude doesn't mean swing voters trust the media.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

R-slurred journo tried to say "trumpers killed journ*lism" but I'm just saying he's r-slurred for saying that.

Just let people enjoy things, sheesh.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>It is hard to be “objective” and sell news at the same time.

Straight from the horse's mouth. :marseylaugh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Selling news is a vile phrase

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also accurate.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>76% of people distrust the media

>52% actually voted

It was the rethuglicans guys

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Journo hacks never talk about the death of correspondence, smarter-than-thou journoshits failing to realise that they know literally nothing about anything except journ*lism and just assuming they didn't need to source information anymore for some reason.

They haven't a fricking clue, that's why no one listens to them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just look at this story today about the balloon. No mainstream journo knows a goddarn thing about aviation and it would never occur to them to spend a couple hours learning today. All they can do is regurgitate press releases from the government.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If they want people’s faith, I don’t understand why they just won’t try lying less.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

a lot of them believe their own bullshit.

This is integral to Manufacturing Consent. It's not a top-down manipulation where all levels are in on it and they're twirling their mustaches while manipulating the public.

If you believe their ideology, you're more likely to rise through the ranks and be given prestige positions. If you don't, you don't get that far. That's simply it.

With journos (and a lot of professions), being agreeable trumps talent and principled disagreement. It's why ((foids)) beat moids in the modern economy.


:#marseydarkpizzashill: The Democratic RethugliKKKan Party will collapse by 2030. :#marseydarkpizzashill:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyhesright:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because lies help the trans lives matter go down. This isn't just limited too America either. Germans have faith in their media because they're good little stormtroopers who repeat trans lives matter but they really shouldn't. @911roofer wouldn't wipe my butt with Der Spiegel.

https://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-relotius-scandal-reaches-fergus-falls-in-america-a-1244944.html

It really is an awful paper.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Where’s the story in that (you need the good guy and the bad guy). Besides it’s a good thing if people act upset and angry that they have been lied to, then you can hold their hand and calm them down with a different story and they will love you for it


![](/images/16754864844011505.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I feel like the fact that if I caned the author of the recent Kiwifarms piece once for every lie in the article, his butt would turn into minced meat by the time I finished, might have something to do with it :marseythinkorino:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Maybe the reason people hate j*unos is because they write shit like this :marseyunamused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No one trusts state media bc it solely serves the interests of the oligarchs, and it’s super obvious, even some liberals can see it. Drunpf defending himself against these propagandist isn’t what ruined their credibility, perhaps even a tiny bit of introspection would help. They literally pushed qanon level Russia conspiracies for two years, shits wild.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i don't trust media not i trust you op. good article

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You will never be a real imposter. You have no sabotage, you have no vent, you have no kill button. You are a noob crewmate twisted by sus and amogus into a crude mockery of Among Us's perfection.

All the “Red sus” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back impostors and crew mates alike mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “crew mates ” laugh at your ghoulish appearance behind sabotaged doors.

Impostors are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of evolution have allowed impostors to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even transimpostors who “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to an impostor. Your bone structure is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a drunk impostor home with you, he'll turn tail and bolt the second he gets a whiff of your diseased, infected User Interface.

You will never be sus. You wrench out a fake act of suspicion every single morning and tell yourself it's going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the tasks piling up creeping up like weeds, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.

Eventually it'll be too much to bear - you'll buy a rope, do your tasks, eject yourself from the Skeld, and plunge into the cold abyss. Your crewmates will find you, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They'll bury you with a headstone marked with your birth occupation, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know a crew mate is buried there. Your body will decay and go back to the dust, and all that will remain of your legacy is a single bone that is unmistakably a crewmate's.

This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back

Snapshots:

Drumpf is literally Hitler:

Drumpf:

he hurt Democrats and that's criminal:

problematic:

lack of women and minorities:

Racism and sexism:

CIA:

Richard Nixon:

just too dumb to understand:

journ*lists are too objective:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

they realized that faith != sales

reminder that "alt media" is still media btw

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.