Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have great respect for anyone who contributes to Wikipedia but it must be so dull.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When I was designing a furniture store I wrote a big, 250 page, properly cited book on the history of mid-century modern furniture, the designers, and the companies involved as a reference manual for the salespeople.

Everything was properly cited and my plan was to use excerpts in order to fill out and fix a lot of existing/stub Wikipedia articles. Once I started taking a deep dive into the Wikipedia process and the people involved I said frick that and decided to keep it all to myself.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's almost entirely propaganda

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There is more to wikipedia than politics, economy and history.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I recently got yelled at by a NEET looking admin for posting something for my client to wikipedia. I wanted to post the admin's rant at me and his pic but it would dox my client. They truly do take their unpaid jobs seriously. The last time I had posted something on Wikipedia was like 10 years ago and he told me to stop ruining wikipedia. lol


Krayon sexually assaulted his sister. https://i.rdrama.net/images/17118241526738973.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17118241426254768.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wikipedia jannies are the nerds of the internet. Which is saying something

Also I love how most things are overly cited for no reason but then you’ll randomly get a blatant bullshit claim that links to some vice article that goes unnoticed or unchallenged (I’m not letting them have my IP)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is why we need mayocide.


Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.