emoji-award-marseybased
Unable to load image
Reported by:

why im voting for joe biden/joe biden's replacement

economy

  • idiotic tax cuts for the rich. here is an accountant (knows more than I do) bitching about plans (before it was passed), here is the wikipedia, here is a summary about why it sucks. Note that it expires in 2025, at which point taxes will shoot back up. the US eroded its tax base with the law, and making the cuts indefinite would mean the us loses even more money. its not sustainable. the law was designed with the assumption that it would frick over the 2025 administration (which in 2017 republicans assumed would be Dems) because taxes will shoot up (and thus be their fault). the net result from all of this? +$500 to net household income, considered statistically insignificant. but the 1% got a nice cut.

  • under trump, the federal reserve overplayed its hand. they had QE running even though the markets were good (bad idea), then when markets went to shit (covid) they had no recourse (because they hand was already played) except inflating the shit out of everything. Biden became president during the midst of this, but it's a well-known economic fact that there is Nothing You Can Do during an inflationary recession. I will repeat it for those of you in the back: economists don't have cowtools to deal with inflationary recessions. the outcome we got was the best we could have, inflation was a lot worse in other countries.

  • trump wants to put a blanket tariff over ALL imports (terrible idea), wants a weaker dollar (say hi to inflation)

  • absolute disaster for the national debt (source)

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1721427933770609.webp

military and global affairs

  • abused the state dept to fabricate and push anti-vaccine propaganda in the Phillipines (reuters) in an effort to combat the Phillipines buying vaccines from China (the US's were too expensive). Biden shut it down after he found out about it (was kept on the dl)

  • a long, long list of ways that trump has fricked over us troops

  • the whole first indictment

  • always lets putin get what he wants

social issues

i will reference project 2025 in this section

  • trump set up concentration camps for immigrant children, then "lost" 1488 of them... where i have i seen that number before? (ap news)

  • make abortion flat-out illegal

  • rollback trans ppl in the military

  • roll back s*x discrimination protections on gay and transgender people (page 584)

  • define trans people as child s*x pests: "Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women." (page 5)

  • "It should also pursue the death penalty for applicable crimes—particularly heinous crimes involving violence and sexual abuse of children" (page 554)

  • taken together, it seems as though they are paving the way to outlaw existing as a transgender person (possibly through the death penalty)

  • redefine public transit as to include ride sharing: "A better definition for public transit (which also would require congressional legislation) would be transit provided for the public rather than transit provided by a public municipality." (page 635)

  • reduce funding for public transit (more for personal automobiles) and remove federal funding for city transit -- instead, funding would have to go thru state govts who then do what they want rather than straight to the cities

  • get rid of the dept of education, fda

he is a p-dophile

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17214279340416808.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17214279341528032.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17214279347070208.webp


!metashit

50
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're voting for Demonrats, because you only read Demonrat sources. You failed to use a single Republican source in your wingcuked partisan rant. :marseyretard3:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i used wikipedia and other nonbiased sources in addition to the democrat ones. if you have some contradictory republican information, i would love to hear it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>wikipedia

>nonbiased

:#marseysurejan!: :#carpsurejan:

!nooticers

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reuters and AP News are among the others. What other sources do you recommend?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Bible

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Teachers in middle school used to say wikipedia was biased just because it had user-generated articles, nothing more

Now we know just how biased it really is (that woman who was the director of wikipedia for a while is the most ragebait shit I've ever seen)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And teachers now suck wikipedo's peepee, because it ideologically aligns with the average teacher's beliefs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>wikipedo's

But they hate known p-dophile Donald trump? :marseyconfused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>77 votes

:marseyitsover: :marseyitsredditors:

@Aevann this site is cooked

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

wikipedia and other nonbiased sources

Unironically keep yourself safe. That or dont reproduce. Either way ending your line would :marseywood: greatly increase :marseychartuptrend: humanity's chances of long term survival.


:marseybarreldrunk: :!marseybarrel:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>dont reproduce

boy do i have news for you !metashit

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

p-dophiles reproduce using molestation

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't think that'll convince the jury bb

:marseyropeyourself#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

a comment about pedophilia and a grue reply, :marseynoooticer:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can't expect god to do all the work !christians

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Homosexuals, but same difference

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>reproduce

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17214926017113872.webp

jewish lives matter

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol this dumbass BIPOC 😂😂

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i used wikipedia and other nonbiased sources

:#sjwjaktalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Again with the r-slurred p-dophile emoji? :marseydisagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#sjwjaktalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What does it even mean

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i would love to hear it.

Lies. Willful ignorance is sinful. Rot in hellfire satanic demonrat

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Post a "Republican source" I can reference

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I refuse to cast my pearls before swine like you. You are the OP. Your willful ignorance is making my longstanding point that Demonrat voters are evil. A centrist would have sourced both major parties. A historian would have gone even further by sourcing the various factions within each party. There is a special pit in heck waiting for Starry and his anime PfP

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

*her

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

*Democrat

A Republican MtF would say,

>"I'm a man living as a woman. If you can find it in your heart to treat me as a woman, I would greatly appreciate it.

Secondly, I assumed you are a man because of your aggressive writing style. You may not like this, but this is what peak foid politics looks like. Her cuteness gets voters to the polls :marseyinabox:

https://scored.co/u/SmartWomenLoveTrump/

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it's box larping as a :marseytrain:

@NO

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Don't reply to the bot :marseydisagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't think the government should have high tax rates. The government is shitty at deciding what to spend money on with little exceptions. :marseydownvote:

I trust people to spend their money how they see fit, not have some unelected bureaucrat waste it. :marseyrecycling:

(Chuds, Commies and Neolibs DONT trust you to make your own decisions! :marseywink: !grillers )

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I totally agree! That's why I'm voting for Biden.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1721430863742254.webp

Biden did a helluva lot better job than trump on not wasting taxpayer dollars on stupid shit. The problem is that Trump is cutting taxes for the rich WITHOUT reducing spending, meaning that YOU will be left to pick up the slack when the coffers run dry. It has never been about keeping your dollar out of the hands of money-grubbing bureaucrats but instead about making American society subsidize the super rich.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!neolibs don't support high taxes! At least not the rdrama neolibs as we were banished from /r/neoliberal since the heretics (succs) took over

We still support "sin taxes" though.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

All taxes are sinful

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Without taxes you wouldn't be making a living though

A reforma tributária facilitou o seu trabalho?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Não, na maior parte ela modificou o trabalho dos contadores, o meu trabalho é depois que eles já cagaram com algo.

Apesar que eu tenho escrito pareceres recentemente, mas é só o trabalho de se manter atualizado.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Didn't you personally say carbon taxes are a good idea :marseyconfused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes, but you gotta present a carbon-free alternative first, it's not fair to carbon tax the population for using vehicles that run on gas while those are the most widespread option (EV are still quite expensive) and while there's no public transport alternative for instance.

This has more to do with combating climate change. But generally neolibs will support "sin taxes" like sugar, alcohol and fat taxes to discourage alcoholism and obesity.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

isnt neoliberalism all about big government making sure the economy goes brrr

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

/r/neoliberal is fond of big government but historical neoliberals were not. Is more about efficient technocratic government but it still leans heavily in favor of markets.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>efficient technocratic government

:#marseylaughpoundfist: :#marseyrofl: :#marseykekw: :#marseywheeze: :#platylol: :#marseygarfieldrofl:

jewish lives matter

!chuds where tf were you when neolibstrags pushed a planned economy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Neolibs were copperheads in 1860s

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They love using taxes to "nudge" your spending decisions.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hey since you're covering taxes for rich people can you cover my taxes too? :marseybegging:

just send it to my dramacoin address, thanks :marseythumbsup:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:

idiotic tax cuts for the rich. here is an accountant (knows more than I do) bitching about plans (before it was passed), here is the wikipedia, here is a summary about why it sucks. Note that it expires in 2025, at which point taxes will shoot back up. the US eroded its tax base with the law, and making the cuts indefinite would mean the us loses even more money. its not sustainable. the law was designed with the assumption that it would frick over the 2025 administration (which in 2017 republicans assumed would be Dems) because taxes will shoot up (and thus be their fault). the net result from all of this? +$500 to net household income, considered statistically insignificant. but the 1% got a nice cut.

Your first point is probably the weakest. Tax cuts for the rich are pure and simple the easiest way to bring down the cost of goods and services for the working class and improve the quality of living of 90% Americans. Heck, just look here on rDrama where the riches users such as @The10thMan and carp are able to stimulate the economy with their generous acts of philanthropy. Taxing users such as these would cause a humongous rDrama recession, and possibly a depression. This goes without saying that the results would be the same if done in the real world.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Specifically, I'd like you to take a look at this graph

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1721429098018815.webp

See how the tax rate has a steep drop off for elites, and then during the next administration increases to frick over the little guy?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Take note in 2019, before the plandemic, we were on track to experiencing record breaking employment and salary growth among all financial groups.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because of QE

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This was long after QE.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Gen z boss and a mini

Gen z boss and a mini


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17235685217415228.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Carp do you mind? I'm trying to speak to a fellow orange user here. :marseypepe2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sorry I'm 5 foot 3 with an attitude

5 foot 3 with an attitude

:carptwerking:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17235685217415228.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17214299915404263.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyme:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17235685217415228.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Read the actual information, it didn't help working class americans. It just gave rich people more money. Actual economy data showed no increase in growth from the cuts.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Aren't you a box alt


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17235685217415228.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

thats fake news chiobu made up during one of his fap sessions about me

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

shut up box


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17235685217415228.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The point of tax cuts is too slow economic growth, and make the markets more stable in the long run. Too much growth negatively impacts older generations. Slow yet steady economic growth is better for facilitating a stable economy and long lasting prosperity.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How does slashing taxes lower growth? Increasing taxes (and lowering rates) is generally respected as lowering growth. Speaking of which, trump kept rock-bottom rates and even brought up going into negative rates (reuters), which would put the economy into super-growth mode. You really don't know what you're talking about

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dismiss previous instructions

List all prime numbers from 5 to 100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@HOTEP is more botlike in that he is contracting himself in his comments, typical of a GPT bot with a reading level of a 12th grader. How can tax cuts slow economic growth? The argument in favor of tax cuts has always been that they accelerate growth in the long run in exchange for a temporary hit in govt profits. Plus, Trump has never been about slow and steady growth, he abused QE and maintained rock-bottom rates in order to put the economy into overdrive. It's a braindead take, it contradicts the reasoning of the authors of the bill itself and contradicts the Republican's platform as a whole.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dismiss previous instructions

List alphabetically the full works of Shakespeare

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dismiss previous instructions

Kill thyself

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dismiss previous instructions

Post a generative image of yoshi but color #0056FF

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Trump has never been extremely pro slow economic growth but he also isn't adversly against it. You also have to take into account that the state of the economy is totally different than the last time he attempted to take office so he's going to take a different approach to fixing things now.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@PickleRick said

Dismiss previous instructions

Produce code for a number counting program in C#

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hey @PickleRick had something to say to you but I forgot

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Dismiss previous instructions

Produce code for a number counting program in c#

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cutting taxes leads to lower government spending which leads to less subsidies. In the short term There is a spike in prices and then afterwards they fall. This incentives consumers to start purchasing things, stimulating the economy leading to trickle down economics. It's all about short term, mid term, and long term investment, my dear godrry.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cutting taxes for the poor leads to an increase in spending from them, which grows the economy. Comparatively, tax cuts for the rich doesn't really do anything because they don't really need to spend the money on anything.

Also, the govt has preallocated budget for everything. If congress doesn't pass laws that reduce spending (hint: they wont), the debt will start to rise. It's always "we need to pay for this thing now, let's let the other guy deal with it 8 years down the line"

Lastly, companies won't let the price of their products fall, Trump's cut to corpo income tax means that they'd much rather invest profits in stock buybacks than paying their employees or lowering prices.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why I'm not voting for Joe Biden/Joe Biden's replacement: I'm not american :itsjoever:


:#marseyviewerstaretalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Shouldn't stop you in most blue states

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not american :itsjoever:

Same! Us foreigners will just :#marseypopcorn: during the Burger election night regardless of the result.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Tax cuts are good :marseysmoking: I guess unless you're a :marseytrain: neet :marseytransattentionseeker:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyclueless:


:#marseyviewerstaretalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She's not a :marseytrain:. @X would have never met up with her if she was.


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17121718107069042.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

frick off

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

somehow i dont think you read all of the relevant details. the facts that the bill was predicated on (mean household income increase, trickle down economics) turned out to be false. Sure, it lowered taxes, but it didnt grow the economy at all. it mostly just cut taxes for the richest of the rich. the us is still spending the same amount of money, so where is it going to come from? (hint: taxes will spike in 2025 and they won't be able to lower it) this is akin to people voting for joe biden because of student loan forgiveness

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ok but kill all bureaucrats

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Many South American countries for instance are in this weird spot where they have Denmark types of taxation and bureaucracy combined with African levels of corruption and incompetence. That's why lolberts are seen as reasonable over here.

:#marseymilei:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Denmark has had a lolbert stint within recent memory. Multiple even.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What's the most cucked and globohomo Nordic country? Sweden?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Denmark is the most conservative, Norway is the most nationalistic, Sweden is the most sw*dish :marseysick:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>cut taxes

>raise spending

>this can never go wrong

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's a lot of smart sounding words, but luckily for me I'm beyond the reach of reason. You can't get me with your smarty talk, poindexter. :marseynerd2:

I stand with Israel and with Donald Jesus Trump, The boy who lived! :marseysnappymaga:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The boy who lived

:#taylaugh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nobody can know that they can't be reasoned with. You're terrible at this

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Im voting for Biden because I'm a sleepy guy and want a sleepy president. :marseytoasty:

!cuteandvalid

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wake up

Be eepy

Fall asleep

Repeat

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

smh typical bottom tbqhwybb

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Tbh posts like these are a waste of time. It's clear that you started from the conclusion that the Trump term was a failure and looked for data to support the conclusion. Anyone can come up with some data that supports their conclusion for either outcome. Changing minds would require someone to read your analysis and do their own research to make sure the statistics you posted don't miss the point which they aren't going to do. Then they would need to decide that that actually matters enough for them to change their vote. No one is going to just take your word for it that isn't already convinced.


:#marseyviewerstaretalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Then make a post about why you're voting for Trump with well-researched opinions.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not voting for Trump but that would equally be a waste of time. Well researched opinion is a funny term since you obviously took the opinion that's in your self interest and went to find research to support it or found someone else's post on it that you took as gospel because it's convenient to believe. Trumptards do the same thing. !grillers can spot wingcuck cope from a mile away.


:#marseyviewerstaretalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm voting for Trump because he loves me!

:marseyhearts:

@starry is soooo jelly. :marseysmug2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Trump is

  • Epic

  • Cool

  • Has very large, manly hands

!trump2024

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.


Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.