DM betting ideas if you want
https://x.com/DrewPavlou/status/1838695429204250848
Have to be honest when I was 16 I probably would have really wanted Rihanna to molest me. https://t.co/ECcpN5jWwm
— Drew Pavlou π¦πΊπ¨πΎπΊπΈπΊπ¦πΉπΌ (@DrewPavlou) September 24, 2024
bonus aellapost
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I 100% wanted to be 'molested' by a hot chick at the age of 15. It's just the way it is. The law is the way it is to protect those teenagers who don't want to be molested.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If anything this is exactly why I'd argue that grooming teenage boys is even worse. They're so overwhelmed with hormones that they aren't used to that their libido will overwhelm what little sense if judgement they have. Grooming and/or fricking teenage boys is like fishing with dynamite.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I would look back at being dynamited by a 28 year old shawty with gratitude and fondness. In fact, I will postulate that every virgin 16 year old groomed by a grown woman guarantees one less incel among us. !incels
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
just yesterday i saw news about this woman molesting a high schooler
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The problem with being a female p-do is that you have to find a boy that wont brag to his bros about fricking a teacher.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Nerds ruin it for the rest of the cool kids once again
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
@Grue thought you were against the proliferation of transgenderism?
Black lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
gays are the ones proliferated by being molested
!chuds
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No doxxing plz
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
proliferate deez nuts
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sure
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Huh?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
When it comes to teenagers, the law is to protect kids from themselves as much as from predatious adults. This goes for boys and girls.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The law was originally meant to protected girl's virginity. Somewhere in the late 20th century people thought law should be s*x-neutral, even though teenage boys and girls are fundamentally different.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
this is transphobia
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's been ruled that boys are still liable for child support even if they were statutorily r*ped. Also the case for full blown r*pe. The law says boys are on the hook for the kid regardless of any circumstances around its conception.
In 2024 a girl can at least choose to abort it if she doesn't want it. The father has absolutely no say in anything that comes after once the s*x happens. In that sense: s*x has become riskier for men in recent years.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Shit sucks. Abolish child support
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
there is an obvious solution to this. Think a bit before bringing forth megar-slurred pseudo-arguments
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What is the obvious solution to an adult molesting a child and a baby resulting from it? Should the 15 year old boy have just said no?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the obvious, common sense solution is to not make minors and r*pe victims eligible for child support
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No fricking shit? You're a goddarn genius. I totally didn't think of that and there is zero possibility that you have some sort of autism.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I reread the chain and must've misunderstood your first reply. I might have autism but that is not related to bad reading comprehension
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
No, laws about ordinary non-consesual s*x do that.
The laws about statutory r*pe are there to protect kids from their own stupidity. Because kids are dumb.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It wasn't dumb of me as a 15 year old to want to have s*x. If I had a time machine, I would transition into a hot girl and let 15 year old me smash
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
errrrr, at 15 u completely lacked any ability to form such a consent due to ur underdeveloped mind and general lack of awareness for consequences.
due to this lacking, there was no possible way you could have actually enjoyed that, as both developed consent and complete awareness for consequences are required for sexual enjoyment.
it would have been r*pe either way
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
my pp gets hard for hot women
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
And when the clock strikes 12 on the night of the 365th day of your 17th year, it magically turns developed enough. Depending on the state and country, of course.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
i do not understand being too young to consent to frick but old enough to be jailed like an adult for violent crimes.
Noooooo you cannot understand s*x at that age but you can understand the consequences of stealing or murder at that age.
Societal laws aren't necessarily about right and wrong but more about what keeps the world spinning without collapse. Otherwise laws would never need changing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We lock up criminals so they can't commit crimes.
If someone does some murdering, we lock them up to prevent them doing any more murdering
If someone does some kid diddling, we lock them up to prevent any more kid diddling.
Get it now?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What if a minor has s*x with another minor. Logically that should be a crime too to prevent the minor from diddling and ruining more minors.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
In some places it is.
But if it's not a crime, then it's not diddling, and if it's not diddling, then there's no need to stop it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
cute twink
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'm way older than 15 and I still want to be molested by a hot 22 year old
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context