https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/1h2tp76/comment/lzlrtfw/?context=8
ugh, i am just going to be a chud and say it. they care more about random Haitians and HONdurans than they do their own family.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I love the only comebacks redditors have is "um actually whose going to do slave labor without the illegals bigots?"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
if Trump deports the illegals who will clean your pottys?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
... Mr Trump.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Make it illegal to give them money or house them and make a big show of arresting some white NGO-tards and landlords. Use asset forfeiture to fund dealing with the violent ones while the rest self deport. All the while smugly insisting you're living up to your very moderate and reasonable policy of "first focus on the violent criminals". Force the libtards to defend the gang bangers and absurd sums of money/hotel accommodations that tax payers are funding.
!project2025
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Also just give farm laborers work visa so they're employers get taxed like they used too.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
apparently most of the Haitians in the US already have asylum in Brazil so they can just go back there?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Theyve already shifted from illegal immigrants to mass importing asylum seekers and allowing them to work without any sort of check and balance while government agencies buy them housing and food. Whole thing is insidious and liberals will totally insist its completely legal
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Good, I hope everyone who posts in /r/politics gets put in camps with them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
how would you feel if naturalized citizens got deported?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm in favor if they prioritize deporting jeets.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If they're not integrated, then i feel pretty good.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I hope the guard towers have air conditioning
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It'll never happen but there's something funny about the idea of a bunch of American states seceding to rejoin the British Commonwealth and swear fealty to the King of England.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
At least the King of England is not a Nazi who is about to put all non-whites and LGBTQ people into concentration camps.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yep, gotta choose your irony here: Swearing fealty to the English crown, or swearing fealty to the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I think i saw some poll where white american liberals were the only people on the US that actually views their own group negatively. As in they rated every other racial group more favoably than themselves.
I belive it to be true cus it is very funny.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Really makes you wish you got picked for the fun surveys and not the lame commercial ones. "Ayo, you got a minute? Rate every race from 0-100. It's for science."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
they prefer space rocks to their blood family members
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
On the planet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I only blame the people who allowed them to cross the border this much without consequences or deportation. They allowed this to go unaddressed for so long that now it guarantees pain. Like refusing to address an infection until suddenly you need to amputate a limb.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
this isn't reddit, we are here to make fun of them, not make salient points
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Like that?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Isn't this what the Vaxxx Mandaters wanted?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They were on the right side of history though.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
why is saying that a thing now? its like they parse information through a consensus lens.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wikipedia had an editor say they don't post the truth, they post the consensus, so if it was around centuries ago they would have said the sun rotates around the earth.
This was said to not take out some proven lies because they were accusations against their enemies, though. So it's up to you to decide how much of that is actually due to putting the beliefs of their peers as being an arbiter of reality and how much is them just being
jannies.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's an interesting observation about Wikipedia's editorial policies and practices. The tension between "truth" and "consensus" in knowledge platforms is a complex issue that goes beyond just Wikipedia.
In some ways, the editor's statement about consensus reflects how scientific and historical knowledge has traditionally developed - through peer review and scholarly consensus. This process can be valuable as it helps filter out fringe theories and unsubstantiated claims.
However, your point about potential bias in how this principle is applied is important. Using consensus as justification to maintain potentially false accusations against perceived enemies suggests the policy might sometimes be wielded selectively rather than consistently applied. This could be seen as reflecting the human dynamics and potential biases of Wikipedia's editorial community rather than a purely objective pursuit of documenting consensus.
The sun/Earth example is particularly apt because it illustrates both the strengths and weaknesses of a consensus-based approach. While scientific consensus eventually corrected the geocentric model, there was indeed a time when the "consensus" view was simply wrong. This highlights how consensus can sometimes impede rather than advance our understanding of truth.
What are your thoughts on how knowledge platforms should balance between documented consensus and emerging evidence that might challenge that consensus?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't really know how they could balance it except update things as they come to light and don't try, or at least don't treat them, as places that are factually correct about contentious issues. See for example their pages on G*mergate and Israel/'Palestine'.
Which is ai think the step that's equally hard to manage unless they completely alter how Wikipedia is run. As rdrama's own Tracing Woodgrains' article showed, all it takes to drive Wikipedia's consensus is one friend and the willpower/autism to fight to keep it there. And if you get a few jannies to agree, say by all being
jannies, then you can control what is considered consensus and lock down the page permanently to only show what you want it to say.
With personal vendettas and biased contributions by this point baked into how Wikipedia works, I think the only thing you can realistically do is either shut it down, or more likely treat it as increasingly untrustworthy as the potential for bias creeps in.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Wouldn't the positive-sum move be for all the blue states to accept that all the migrants be forced to relocate within their borders?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
2016 I could understand these stupid freakouts but now we have seen 4 years of Trump
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
real trumpism has never been tried
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah but this time project 2025 is gonna send every single woman, child, brown, and twink to the conversion camps
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I support this cause we will have fewer women, children, and twinks in America.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
B-B-But Bussy-boy, you are a twink!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're right. I'm not going anywhere near conversion camps.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There will be a homo underground rail(like in s*x
)road and you will be a twink slave for a closet gay.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
As long they're not 5'6 160lb I will just pretend to be gay.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
They act like those 4 years of mostly nothingburger policies were 4 years in Nazi Germany.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Interesting. Let's check his religion
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
most of them can't secede because once you get past the suburbs, it's miles and miles of domestic terrorists with small arms
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The dramanaut in me wants to see the US fall apart, but the pragmatist in me would rather live in a country where insane leftoids and insane rightoids keep each other in check than in a country that is controlled by insane leftoids or a country that is controlled by insane rightoids.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Is this new future crime against humanity before or after the DEFINITELY REAL THIS TIME genocide of all
s
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/1h2tp76/comment/lzlrtfw/?context=8:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context