facts
, guest-starring Bardfinn!
https://skyview.social/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbsky.app%2Fprofile%2Flizthegrey.com%2Fpost%2F3lk7kazvr3s2n
Defendants, who received legal funding from the owner of Kiwi Farms, had the opportunity to raise and chose not to raise defenses of truth or justification, leaving intact the previous finding that the content was defamatory. We settled out of court the dispute over whether they were a publisher.
— Liz Fong-Jones (ๆน็ฆฎ็) (@lizthegrey.com) 2025-03-12T21:40:30.955Z
Somebody tell Bussy it's about time for part 2 of The Parable of Mailfrawd.
It is defamatory according to 
court to say Liz Fong-Jones tweeted this, so don't. 
:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Still no idea how he got away with the consent accident even as the term is beciming more and more common among creepy internet degens
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because the actual story behind it actually was kind of a nothingburger iirc
It was just the term that was so blatantly biased that chuds desperately wanted cancel culture to "do its thing" the same way it does to them
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah we should definitely believe the deranged
sexpest. They wouldn't lie.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The thing is, there's no accusation of anything else by anyone else
The source of the story is
and that's the only person who has ever brought it up and they had no reason to other than to convey what they thought was a sad story
If there was a victim who ever said "no that's not right" yeah I'd probably believe them
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, he says in the tweet he's doing it as a response to a r*pe accusation that's making the rounds.
Since nobody knows the other side of the story, he was probably accused in some
groomercord he and the supposed victim hang out in, and he posted it on Twitter to get his side of the story out on the wider internet first.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's in reply to an accusation from some European
that has, I believe, vanished from the internet. Unsurprising, considering Thwomp is weirdly successful at getting his way at shutting people up.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Imagine they spent a 10th of the effort they put into kiwifarms into threatening there r*pe victim.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But if they were doing that they wouldn't have needed to bring it up themselves at all?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Insurance policy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
"This lady claimed I r*ped her, but that's not true because, uh...she considers dog hair on her clothes to be r*pe!"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Except people in those circles literally did go around calling stuff like that r*pe very loudly for like 5 years
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You roll around with dogs, you get fleas.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah, with how easily accusations like this get thrown around by certain people, liz could've genuinely done nothing wrong there. Still a manipulative, power hungry butthole. But not a male feminist.
On the other hand, one of their friends is a convicted wife beater. And the other company they keep is... Interesting
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Firstly, it really looks like
is saying search engines are shit now because he's just that important.
But to your point, it's a ridiculous story in so many ways and
is an obvious self-serving, predatory butthole, that it's satisfying to use his own words and professed ideals against him.
Who knows how much of the story is true, it's
-on-
violence. 
telling the truth is even possible, given how crazy 
s are. But his history of bullshit, his efforts to scrub it off the internet, and the way his cohorts should, based on their professed beliefs, have distanced themselves from him but instead support him unquestioningly, gives good reason to think he's a lying male feminist. 'Consent accident' being a perfect example of how progs try to manipulate language to their benefit is just that extra sauce that makes something go viral.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Did Liz delete those sexual assault tweets?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah I mean I get why people latch onto it I'm just saying it's not surprising that it didn't go anywhere
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
all women lie about r*pe so the consent accident was probably an accident after all
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I've just never understood why he shared that on social media in the first place.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
null may be too neurodivergent to let his site die but this chigga is too neurodivergent to let his site live, equal and opposites, yin and yang
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
All because a consent accident that happened decades ago smh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You don't necessarily need to use AI material to poison someone's reputation, they can do it themselves by raping someone and then calling attention to it by spending a decade and untold resources calling attention to it by forcing CDN providers to deplatform anyone who links to their own public admission of the incident happening.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Liz Fong Jones is a male feminist
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And a dog fricker (not female)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
And the funniest part, a castrated freak who can no longer, or ever again, feel sexual pleasure
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
After all that, hurting LFJ's search engine optimization was truly a step too far. Kiwi Farms is done.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Hey, these aren't fun or facts!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
A consent accident? ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ
Holy shit these people are insufferable and should die
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
All this deranged
has to do is touch grass and his life would improve.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Chuds need to remember that she isn't actually guilty of any crime. While she is repulsive and how she acts makes her easy to hate (I certainly do), she isn't actually a criminal nor did she somehow get away with something.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Unless you think he's involved in any of the DDOS attacks on
, which is very plausible.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
False. Xhe is guilty of crimes against humanity by simply existing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Which combo of people would an average women be in most danger from if locked in a room for an entire weekend?
1) Ted Bundy and Harvey Weinstein
2) Bill Clinton and Bill Cosby
3) Liz Dong Gone and El Bardo
4) Vince McMahon and Hulk Hogan
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
There are no quotes. Deal with it.
Snapshots:
https://skyview.social/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbsky.app%2Fprofile%2Flizthegrey.com%2Fpost%2F3lk7kazvr3s2n:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
The Parable of Mailfrawd:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context