(Pro)statists mad

https://twitter.com/HJoyceGender/status/1481656625119121414
60
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People with prostates is accurate and descriptive.

If someone had to get their prostate removed for medical reasons, then they don’t need to worry about prostate cancer

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, it’s a non answer to the question of “who needs to get their prostate checked”. Of course it’s “people with prostates” but it doesn’t tell you who is likely to have a prostate. It’s not a helpful answer at all.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Right, it's a circular definition and completely useless.

Good morning, I hate wokies.

:marseybongo:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you want a question like “who is likely to have prostates” answered, maybe you should ask it.

The great game. Play it well, or die.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.