He said it was the internet group where his furry groomercord originated. AND HE DIDNT EVEN MENTION @Marco!!! unless Marco is corvus. Rip free advertising lmao. @TracingWoodgrains why do you deny us? Your people?? And I thought you were one of the good ones.... YOU DIDNT EVEN PLUG YOUR RDRAMA ACCOUNT WHERE YOU DO YOU BEST WORK!!! oh well I guess don't trust furries to do big projects from now on.
Reported by:
- Lv999_Lich_King : He's not even a good journ*list lol
- PermaChudRanch : attention whoring, metadrama, big cringe
- snus : warning: MASSIVE FRICKING SPERGING inside
Despite the libsoftiktok bait having Marsey once, and rdrama **twice** that motherlover @tracingwoodgrains only mentioned the site ONCE and it was in passing.
- 99
- 81
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not sure what to tell you, mate. Every step of the planning and execution of the project was contained within the dramafur groomercord, I ran the story by everyone involved for comment, and I credited everyone who had a major part in it and who asked for credit with the specifics of what they did. I'm not looking to distance myself from anyone, just trying to provide an accurate picture of things.
@Marco You read the story in advance personally, I asked you for feedback/suggestions, I listened to all of your recommendations. What gives?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
wow are we also getting some metadrama to complement the regular drama? double profit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
rdrama.net, it knows what I want.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The very few suggestions I made never made it into your final draft, and there was almost zero references to rdrama in the interview either - even if it all happened in your off-shoot furry groomercord it's still a part of the wider dramasphere. I suggested that your title should be more abundantly clear that it was a group effort but you changed it last-minute back to "I did this".
I just think it's incredibly lame that you barely mentioned rdrama at all when it was an rdrama op from the start.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Then tell me that before I push it live, or at least don't throw me under the bus in public. I obfuscated your involvement because you asked me to. I wanted to promote your role in it clearly and celebrate what you accomplished with it; if you had told me you wanted that credit clearly pushed to the site, I would have listened. I've been tense for days trying to get it pulled together with all the angles properly covered, and up until it published I had every impression you were satisfied with it.
This, from you, comes as a blindside. Come on, man.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's a little hard to do that when you change things last-minute and go ahead with publishing it without giving a heads up.
Anyways it wasn't me who made this thread, I just wanted to put it on record that warned in advance that it seemed too self-centered.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You said zilch about the article being too self-centered, dude. You messaged me upset about an unrelated op. Again: what gives?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I rest my case.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lol fair, can't argue with that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I demand you provide an update about how fussyblasted OP and Marco are.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Bone and make up already
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Drinking again?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Imagine caring more about getting credit than enjoying the drama.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Bullying furries is fun and always morally correct
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
On one hand - fair enough.
But on the other... pretty much all of our (successful) baits initial planning stages are contained within some off-site platform. There really isn't a way to do these things otherwise without getting discovered immediately. So it's a bit weak.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's fair. I didn't realize that the people involved (@Marco) wanted it credited that way, and would have written it differently if I had. I was just trying to pull the threads of the story together and account for everything.
In retrospect, I think it's a mistake for me to get personally involved in this sort of op--it adds a lot of complications I wasn't anticipating, and I'm trying to figure out the right balance. Sorry I mishandled it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Donโt be a kitty about it. Go full gonzo journ*lism and BECOME the story. Also, tell dramatards who donโt like it to suck your fat nuts, donโt apologize like a redditor
Theyโre acting like foidbrained r-slurs. You know it, I know it.
Love you though babe
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
You're back!!
But yeah the driving force should be providing us with our much needed attention (unironically). If it's not to gain infamy, then it kind of is just self-fellating
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yup. Obviously shit we do isn't going to all be the site itself doing shit. Wider dramaverse has always been somewhat decentralised...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lol if it was posted onsite then guaranteed some 5iq r-slur would've definitely found a way to ruin it, even if not maliciously.
I don't think everyone should be able to claim credit for something they had no part in, but everyone who did play a part met here, so it's still a drama-op
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Maintaining OPSEC until the wingdings are trolled epically.
Premature smugposting to own the libs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yeah rdrama has very little do with the bait beside the fact that the people who organized it also have rdrama account
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is why literally everyone hates furries.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
A known trolling website manages to get their name and the name of their mascot in a bait of a twitter account with more then half a million followers, and you didnt see it fit to even mention it??? Why not?? That is such a big part of the bait you cant blame me for thinking you left it out intentionally.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
They just jelly of that blue busy, where are the Lucario posts?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
nah, you don't owe shit to rdrama, frick them entitled bitches
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
On the flip side his entire journ*listic career has been built by writing about rdrama.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
sneed
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context