Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They must think he isn't going to run again in 2024 or will lose the primary. I refuse to believe there isn't some kind of angle here

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They got called out in The Atlantic. I know it means nothing to us but for groups like the ACLU (and their donors more importantly) this was really really bad, like, just below Jan 6th bad, but not 9/11 bad

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I thought 1/6 was like 10x worse than 9/11.

We need a fricking scorecard.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

1/6 is an event worthy of starting a new calendar.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It was 1/6th as bad

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When you sit at Nancy Pelosi desk and cause 10 9/11’s

:#troll:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When you get to sniff AOCs chair

:#marseysniff:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh, NO! Not called out in The Atlantic!

:marseypearlclutch:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its a big deal for neolibs ok

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also they likely know drunpf can’t come back to Twitter due to a contractual obligations with truth social

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He'll just ignore his contractual obligations (like always) and the Truth Social cucks will let him because they're terrified of annoying his dimwitted loyalists.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Was that not just some opinion piece?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Im pretty sure they didn't support his ban in the first place. But nvm I think I'm mixing ACLU with EFF?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Maybe the post is ironic?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.