Lol. Remember that BBC article about lesbians getting r*ped by “lesbians”? Turns out BBC editorial staff altered direct quotes from the victim to change he/him references to they/them to respect the lesbian rapèr’s pronouns.

Original article:

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-57853385.amp

The quote, given by an anonymous lesbian, initially read:

"I was too young to argue and had been brainwashed by queer theory, so he was a 'woman' even if every [fiber] of my being was screaming throughout, so I agreed to go home with him. He used physical force when I changed my mind upon seeing his peepee and r*ped me."

The BBC report introduced the women as having

"reported a trans woman physically forc[ed] her to have s*x after they went on a date," and then quotes her as saying, "[They] threatened to out me as a terf and risk my job if I refused to sleep with [them]. 'I was too young to argue and had been brainwashed by queer theory so [they were] a 'woman' even if every [fiber] of my being was screaming throughout so I agreed to go home with [them]. [They] used physical force when I changed my mind upon seeing [their] peepee and r*ped me.'"

Edit: please see the ‘Executive Complaints Unit’ (ECU) response to the many complaints regarding the article. I’m pretty sure Bardfinn sent in some long winded complaint from this link. MUST READ:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/ecu/newsonlineoctober2021

The ECU has received a significant number of complaints about the above article on the BBC News website. Complainants have raised a wide range of concerns about the accuracy and impartiality of the article and its capacity to cause harm and offence. Each complaint has been read and considered.

Update 31 May 2022:

The article's headline has been changed from 'We're being pressured into s*x by some trans women' in light of a ruling from the BBC's Executive Complaints unit. You can see the ruling here.

Since publication of this article the BBC's Executive Complaints Unit has also ruled that the original article did not go far enough to make clear to readers the survey's "lack of statistical validity." The article has been amended to reflect this finding.