Unable to load image

:marseytrain: escalate their complaints about the :chudsey: BBC article about lesbians being forced to suck the girldick to the head jannies (Ofcom)

https://medium.com/@notCursedE/my-complaint-to-ofcom-re-that-bbc-article-5c1fdb2f7b7f

BBC Article in question

Archive of original edit

reddit post that went nowhere

twitter post that also went nowhere

I guess there's a reason some people call the UK, TERF Island.

Also, it's sad to see the BBC going downhill the way they are, and not just on this matter.

I get it, tories don't care that they destroy the BBC's reputation if it gets them some short-term advantage, but it's still sad to see.


What do you expect from a transphobic company like the @BBC


Happy Pride month.
To kick it off, the BBC announces it isn't transphobia to declare that accepting trans women in society is sexual assault.


People need to keep going and do the Ofcom complaint. I know it's exhausting (is it the 3rd or 4th time writing the same thing? I lost count), but we need the BBC to own up to its transphobia and publicly acknowledge the article was transphobic garbage and apologise to us.


Please complain to the BBC first. The BBC’s regulator Ofcom may later consider a complaint but only after the BBC has replied in full. If so we’ll tell you how to contact Ofcom. The exception is for a complaint about alleged unfairness or infringement of privacy to you (not someone else). These can be made either to the BBC or Ofcom first, but not to both.

they did, and the BBC "Executive Complaints Unit" responded :marseylongpost2: here

The Head of the ECU found that the article, though a legitimate piece of journ*lism overall, fell below the BBC’s standards of accuracy in two respects: the headline gave the misleading impression that the focus of the article would be on pressure applied by trans women, and the treatment of the survey conducted by Get the L Out did not make sufficiently clear that it lacked statistical validity. He also found a breach of standards in connection with one contribution to the article (subsequently removed) which he considered to have been appropriately addressed by an update added to the article. The complaints were therefore partly upheld in relation to accuracy and resolved in relation to the deleted contribution.

post here about this: Lol. Remember that BBC article about lesbians getting r*ped by “lesbians”? Turns out BBC editorial staff altered direct quotes from the victim to change he/him references to they/them to respect the lesbian rapèr’s pronouns. :marseytrain::marseytrain::marseytrain::marseytrain:

obviously that wasn't good enough for the women (new edition) so they're escalating their complaints

Trans activism UK responded and encouraged the anti-hate soldiers to go to ofcom. Wait, who? Their twitter account has 6,308 followers :marseydicklet: and the "official response" is hosted on what I assume to be the one person behind this "organisation"'s blog:

TL;DR - My name is Laura, and I've spent the past several years working as a full time video game critic, video creator, podcaster, author, and all around maker of things. You may know me as a co-host on the Podquisition Podcast, a cast member on the D&D Podcast Dice Funk, half of Queer & Pleasant Strangers, or as the former News Editor at Kotaku UK, Former UK EIC at Destructoid, or a freelance contributor to Polygon, IGN, Vice, Rock Paper Shotgun, The Guardian, and a bunch of other places.

Alternatively, you might know me because of my upcoming published books, Last summer I published the autism and LGBT status centric memoir Uncomfortable Labels, and in 2021 I'm publishing the silly video game butt centric Things I Learned From Mario's Butt, as welkl as an anthology of gender affirming stories titled Gender Euphoria.

all valuable work :marseyyass:

The BBC argues that there is not enough consensus on what does or does not constitute transphobia, and therefore due impartiality doesn’t require them to deplatform transphobic groups in the same manner.

chuds at the BBC amplifying hate speech :marseybeanangry:

The BBC claims that it is not misgendering to refer to a trans woman as a “biological male”, or to describe their body as “male”, and that doing so in no way contradicts a trans woman’s status as legally female, which is honestly a ridiculous claim to make.

BBC journos need to take the advanced biology course

With regards to the inclusion of Lily Cade in the article, the ECU denies that the BBC or Caroline Lowbridge were aware of Cade’s sexual assault allegations prior to the piece’s publication. However, it does not address that these allegations were public knowledge, that they failed to spot them before publishing the article, and that they were incredibly slow to remove her from the piece.

lol apparently the BBC had included an interview with a lesbian (legacy) male feminist

Speaking more generally, the BBC ECU response seems to take the stance that the article did not contribute to perpetuating or increasing a belief in harmful stereotypes about a minority group. We believe that this is easy to disprove, as the comments on social media where the piece was posted on Twitter and Facebook were overwhelmingly filled with commenters using the piece as “evidence” that they were right to believe most trans women were male feminists, and as such should have fewer legal rights.

The piece was celebrated by anti-trans hate groups, using it to legitimise their views due to it having been published by such a renowned broadcasting company, which we believe contributed to harmful stereotypes held against trans women.

While the BBC acknowledged many of our serious complaints about the piece, they have refused to take the story down, they have not made significant changes to alert readers today of the flaws in the piece, and they have not amended the piece to make its flaws and biases clear to readers.

The piece as it currently stands still platforms groups like Get The L Out and the LGB Alliance without context, it still cites a statistically insignificant survey, and it still does not contextualise that one of the interviewees, a cis lesbian, admitted to the very crime the article suggested trans women were at risk of committing.

The lack of amendment and correction can still cause harm, as can the failure to truly explain the dangers of the misinformation that remains within the article.

harmful speech and dangerous misinformation, can't believe how far the BBC has fallen :marseysad2:

they then go on to encourage people to report it to the uk media gigajannies, and the no-name "transgender journ*list" redditor did, in that medium post:

The BBC report that the group responsible for this poll, Get The L Out, demonstrated at multiple Pride marches.

What they don’t include is that this group invaded London Pride march in 2018 with signs specifically designed to make others feel unsafe and unwelcome; such as “trans activism erases lesbians” and others which dogwhistled their exclusionary politics.

how is that a dogwhistle it's quite direct lol

The piece by the BBC continues its platforming of transphobic conspiracy theories with its take on ‘the cotton ceiling’. Where the BBC assert things like “cotton is a reference to women’s underwear” however that is not true. This is a misrepresentation by anti-trans activists specifically to characterise transgender women as predatory men. The cotton does refer to underwear, yes, but the cotton ceiling as a concept is not exclusive to transgender lesbians and is instead an umbrella term referring to all of the ways in which our prejudices and biases can impact our sexual relationships.

"however that is not true" or "the cotton does refer to underwear, yes", which is it :marseygigaretard:

Changes made to the article since people began complaining about it include; changing the title slightly, adding a small paragraph about Get The L Out’s study not being statistically significant, adding some extra comments by trans people who oppose the narrative being manufactured and removing the section on Lily Cade. This quite simply does not cover the fact that this article exists solely to launder the views of anti-trans activists and make them appear justifiable.

so true, transmisia of any kind is never justifiable!

This wasn’t journ*lism. At best this was hate-fueled gossip. Hate-fueled gossip which, coming from our state broadcaster no less, has the power to do untold damage to the health and safety of the marginalised community I belong to.

What do you think will happen?:

126
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah, we've officially reached that point where it is transphobic to interview women who have been pressured by :marseytrain2:s into having s*x with them.

Good job, everyone!

:marseyclapping:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The most oppressed group, being genocided everyday. They deserve this win

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Gemma Stone is the troid who bragged about waving his peepee all over in women's rooms, putting his peepee on door handles in women's rooms, pissing on potty seats, threatening to mouth r*pe women, sending death threats to female public figures, etc. The usual troid stuff :marseywholesome:

Anyway, he considers himself an important :marseytrain2:alist and got bussy busted like a year or two ago about people nooticing :marseythonk: what a piece of shit he was so he quit the Internet for good because literal neo Nazis were going to lynch him or something. But, like all attention starved :marseytrain2:s, not getting attention almost killed him so he was back online within weeks of him being super scared for his safety.

Eternal bong face

![](/images/16554227796275547.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its transphobic to cry while watching your wife be r*ped bigot :#marseytrain::#marseytrain:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyyawn:

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

sentient and mean :marseycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Snappy’s not holding back anymore.

:marseyworried:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • Pog : Sexual assault

unzips

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yoo BBC what the heck?

"Although there is currently little data on the sexual orientation of trans women, she believes most are female-attracted because they are biologically male and most males are attracted to women."

You also don't get immunity from transphobia for being trans

Can't prove them wrong so I'll just call them transphobic

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

currently little data on the sexual orientation of trans women

![](/images/16554207654607258.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

most people are straight, so most :marseytrain2:s are probably going to be 'straight'. le science

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That is a lot of autism for one post. Everyone involved, including OP.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyautismpat::chadthankskingcapy:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

YouTuber Riley Dennis - who declined to speak to the BBC - argued that "dating preferences" are discriminatory in one of her videos

Remember foid, not liking a feminine peepee is discriminatory. Also. mirring this lady(male)'s adam apple

![](/images/1655408125002486.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The only people in the history of the world who have argued that “dating preferences are discrimination” are trains and incels and in a lot of ways they’re the same group.


![](https://files.catbox.moe/y2zrro.png)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In 100 years society will have fully accepted the Intel to catgirl pipeline theory

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

her adams apple is like DANGER DANGER WILL ROBINSON

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I bet if she put a cute choker on it would totally cover it up and no one would be the wiser

:marseyembrace:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

why TF r Black folk added here 💀 that’s a whole butt man who can take off his agp woman’s face I can’t fricking skin myself ffs :marseyrage:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Few groups hate black women as much as white trans women, they really fell they can boldly say stuff like "if you are ok having s*x with black women you should be ok having s*x with me", or other variations of "if you see EVEN black woman as woman then my AGP butt should be a woman too" with no repercussions.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

u r a foid then huh wasn’t sure but daaaang this seems hella terfy n I fricking love it 🥰 ye I used to post screenies to the GC subs of cac :!marseytrain:s saying this shit it ain’t uncommon at all I was more shitposting in my earlier comment

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

THAT LADY HAS A FUNNY LUMP IN HER THROAT!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

👀

![](/images/16554042700132427.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Controversial, but I side with the cute journ*list rather than the hideous troids

![](/images/16554111461484978.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If it's britbong vs train you lose no matter what

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Bong genetics skipped her. Maybe she's Polish.

![](/images/16554127089551454.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The original article was tailer made for rdrama. Shit was put up on October of 2021 and trains cannot evict it from their heads since. They will not stop till the article is taken down and I am going to bet it will.

I remember seeing the original article posted here and that was the funniest shit ever right next to that phrase “cotton ceiling” trains invented because they couldn’t get in lesbians panties.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thinking that shaming women into dating them is a viable strategy is proof that the reddit trains were clueless neurodivergent moids before(and after) they hatched.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

BBC is evil, watch NHK instead! :3

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No. :#chadblack:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseysal: :#marseybong:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

poor male feminists

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseybong: why do i care?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This seems like the least relevant issue for "TERFs" to focus on. Oh no, crazy men have crazy opinions, whatever shall I do?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is so tame. When I was a kid, the BBC was actually getting into scandals about cool stuff, like when the army just fricking straight up murdered 3 micks on the street in Gibraltar in broad daylight and they wouldn't report it. And when ITV did they got their license revoked.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Let's do some heckin' science!

A 2015 survey of roughly 3,000 American trans women showed that at least 60% were attracted to women.[5] Of the trans women respondents 27% answered gay, lesbian, or same-gender-loving, 20% answered bisexual, 19% heterosexual, 16% pansexual, 6% answered asexual, 6% queer, and 6% did not answer.[3]

19% said they're heterosexual (only want to sleep with MEN) which means the the remaining 81% want to r*pe cis lesbians with their GIRLPEEPEE

transwomen are literally just incels who have taken the final step to slither their way into a woman's bed

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In this moment I am gender euphoric. Not because of any phony surgeon's blessings. But because, I am feminized by my soy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I guess there's a reason some people call the UK, TERF Island.

we here at rdrama are more like a TERF archipelago

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseycock: News

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hopefully the BBC goes under soon. And the trans who are malesplaining to lesbians just go to prison. And london sink into the ocean like in the 90s smash hit with rutger hauer Split Second

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can’t even imagine reporting a post or comment. Trains write a whole butt article because they want something removed. Why are they so obsessed with control?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Trans are truly a blessing to the world, putting doubt on all phobias now, even that the insult may be overused.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lesbos don't like it

Suck the girl peepee

Suck the girl peepee

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.