Unable to load image

[πŸ€“πŸ€“πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜] Anyone Else Think It's Kinda Weird That There's No Real Photographs Of Where We Live?

https://old.reddit.com/r/globeskepticism/comments/veli1d/anyone_else_think_its_kinda_weird_that_theres_no?sort=controversial

Most Based Comments

Basedness: πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”˜πŸ”˜

[removed] (5)

You know there's no working globe map too tho right? (-10)

Basedness: πŸ”₯πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜

That's why the meme specified "real" photographs, not obvious fake CGI ones like shown here (5)

Since I went looking I just found a few cool live image feeds from various sources! So I guess thanks for the discussion my friend. (1)

Basedness: πŸ”₯πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜

But it wasn't talking about a moving picture. The claim is that the ball earth is spinning, so any photograph taken of it would by definiton be a picture of a spinning ball earth (5)

Unless those pictures are of a spinning ball earth. That's my confusion. The meme says there aren't any then shows more than 10 pictures. (0)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: πŸ˜‘πŸ˜‘πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜

Hmm what are your affirmative beliefs of how the universe works then? Do you have any or do you think it can’t be known at this time? (2)

Nobody does, and thats why its called the "THEORY OF GRAVITY". Because its just that, a THEORY, not FACT. I think youre missing the point, globe earth AND flat earth are both equally plausable as they are equally disprovable. Its nearly impossible for anything to be Scientific fact, because a lot of it is theory and trying to prove the theories wrong. Most of science is just trying to prove theories wrong. (4)

Angriness: πŸ˜‘πŸ˜‘πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜

I don't like your statement because the example you provided is nonsensical (1)

You mean the example where you used correlation to equal causation, and I inserted "A" but you missed the forest for the trees... that statement...?Your logic (gawddarnit I know I would have to write it in fricking crayon) via your stolen meme states: than a thing cannot be correct because it lacks photographic evidence...Regardless of my ensampleing the fact remains that correlation does not equal motherfrickin causation and more importantly, which you also failed to address, it hurts the message...but you're too dense to see beyond your own nose... you'd rather be right than to listen yo constructive criticism ...listen... how do I know all of this, how can I be so audacious to say this...?Look at how you've read my comments... what tone did you read them in... was it a negative tone, like a drill sergeant yelling at his recruits... or did you read my comments with a compassionate tone... of a brother in arms calling you on your BS...? Did you even give me the benefit of the doubt, ... (-2)

Angriness: πŸ˜‘πŸ˜‘πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜

If they lie about the "globe earth" why would they show us pictures about flat earth then? That's like someone being really bad at lieing, which they're not (1)

Because nobody is lying? Also you're supposed to explain why your clearly wrong theory is correct, not that the other is false with clearly wrong arguments. (1)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/Boofdoink

Score: πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜

Number of comments: 2

Average angriness: πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜

Maximum angriness: πŸ˜‘πŸ˜‘πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜

Minimum angriness: πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜πŸ”˜

:marppy: autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramautists. :marseycapitalistmanlet: Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion :marseyjamming:

22
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is good shit. Is this

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don’t know, but it’s hilarious.

Noooo there’s a satellite feed right here! Here’s fifteeen links and 300 pictures! Stop disrespecting my heckin oblate spheroid!!! :soycry::soycry::soycry:

Those are fake. :gigachad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

fifteeen links and 300 pictures

I think your trying to hard to convince me and therefore im suspicious

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Both probably.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyfbicomputer:

Snapshots:

/u/Boofdoink:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I understand flat earthers more than I understand those who argue with them.

Like, what stake do these people have in convincing people the world is round? Just let them believe its flat. They're only so evangelical about it because nerds spend so much time tryo g to prove they're wrong.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The longest angry message should be a snappy quote.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You mean the example where you used correlation to equal causation, and I inserted "A" but you missed the forest for the trees... that statement...? Your logic (gawddarnit I know I would have to write it in fricking crayon) via your stolen meme states: than a thing cannot be correct because it lacks photographic evidence... Regardless of my ensampleing the fact remains that correlation does not equal motherfrickin causation and more importantly, which you also failed to address, it hurts the message... but you're too dense to see beyond your own nose... you'd rather be right than to listen yo constructive criticism ...listen... how do I know all of this, how can I be so audacious to say this...? Look at how you've read my comments... what tone did you read them in... was it a negative tone, like a drill sergeant yelling at his recruits... or did you read my comments with a compassionate tone... of a brother in arms calling you on your BS...? Did you even give me the benefit of the doubt, or did you get defensive...? ain't nobody messin' with you, but you, brohcheeze. Don't use faulty logic nor arguments, plain and simple

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Always fascinating to see the cultists come out with the insults when they can't prove their nature-defying fantasy potato rock

This tbh

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You mean the example where you used correlation to equal causation, and I inserted "A" but you missed the forest for the trees... that statement...?Your logic (gawddarnit I know I would have to write it in fricking crayon) via your stolen meme states: than a thing cannot be correct because it lacks photographic evidence...Regardless of my ensampleing the fact remains that correlation does not equal motherfrickin causation and more importantly, which you also failed to address, it hurts the message...but you're too dense to see beyond your own nose... you'd rather be right than to listen yo constructive criticism ...listen... how do I know all of this, how can I be so audacious to say this...?Look at how you've read my comments... what tone did you read them in... was it a negative tone, like a drill sergeant yelling at his recruits... or did you read my comments with a compassionate tone... of a brother in arms calling you on your BS...? Did you even give me the benefit of the doubt, ...

:#marseychefkiss:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.