Unable to load image

[foid nonsense] Spotify about to be racist against Meghan Markle (allegedly)

Continuing with their “Get woke, go broke” theme, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are ALLEGEDLY about to be dropped from their Spotify deal, meaning Meghan’s feminist podcast about women stereotypes may never see the light of day. 😥

It was supposed to premiere this summer. teaser had dropped 3 months ago but since then it’s been radio silent (haha get it?). Two big gossip sites have mentioned over the past two weeks her show is about to get cancelled. There’s a “royal reporter”/syncophant of theirs who put out a piece the other day about how the pair is still concerned about “COVID misinformation” on Spotify—preparing an excuse for the break-up that doesn’t look like them getting fired.

The gruesome twosome had signed a slew of deals (Netflix, Spotify, Penguin) when they left the royal family but in two years they have only put out ONE Christmas special podcast 18 months ago. That’s it. No other content on any platform, just one train wreck interview with Oprah.

One of their projects was already officially dropped from Netflix and (allegedly)Harry’s book isn’t juicy enough for his publishers (they paid him $8MM).

The reason this is so juicy is their expenditures are MASSIVE and they have pretty much no other financial support other than some small inheritances for Harry. Their house has a big mortgage, their security is easily $100k a month, they pay a bunch of staff at their foundation, their foundation gives away $$ but doesn’t have an endowment, MM has expensive taste and they are constantly suing people. They were iced out at the jubilee and loudly boo-ed so they are DEFINITELY not coming back into the royal fold.

This is a train wreck in motion and I will keep you all updated.

![](/images/16559254527478993.webp)


No boys allowed!! (Except Chewy)

142
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Really great, informative post. I'm glad we have users like you on this site proving us with such high-quality content

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Simp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People are saying subservient men are simps. What the frick is wrong with a subservient man? How is treating a woman like gold nullifying oneself? If that’s who you are as a person, you are solidifying yourself, establishing yourself in the relationship. There is nothing wrong with being a “simp.” You don’t have to be an “alpha” male or fake some ogreish form of masculinity. Being subservient does not make you weak. If anything, it makes you stronger than those who can’t see past their own inflated chest to recognize that you don’t always have to be rigid, withholding, and in control of the situationship.

Big push to stop using the word.. in any sense. I’ve seen it mostly used to describe younger guys who do nice things to display the affection they have for someone.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

“ If that’s who you are as a person” hitting on other man waffus is what you are ?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Please don’t flirt with her

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She is mine wafu !

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.