the only thing it means is that states get to decide if and when abortion is illegal. this actually protects liberals too because they cannot be stopped legally from create their state size gay communist utopia either anymore.
important information alert: cancelling roe v wade doesn't mean abortion is illegal
- 32
- 11
Top Poster of the Day:
LiterallyShaking
Current Registered Users: 25,042
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS SITE GUIDE DIRECTORY Emojis & Art | Info Megathreads BROWSE HOLES CREATE HOLECURRENT EVENTS:
/h/kappa Monthly Tournament
fighting vidya - Street Fighter 3 : 3rd Strike | 10k+ prize pool | March 23rdDrama: any incident, scene, gaffe, rumor, opinion, or disagreement that is blown entirely out of proportion.
Do your part to keep our community healthy by blowing everything out of proportion and making literally everything as dramatic as possible.
Rules:
Asking to see who saved comments/posts=1 day ban
You must be 18 or older to view this site.
Discord users will be banned on sight.
Don't post anything illegal.
No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
No doxxing.
Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
Absolutely NO misgendering.
Absolutely NO antisemitism.
Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
Participation implies enthusiastic consent to being mod abused by unstable alcoholic bullies.
Related subreddits:
πππ«π© π°π¨π³ ππ«π
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Common sense abortion control!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It does in Missouri.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
so move to another state that matches your politics? How hard is this shit?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This does match my politics. And I don't live in Missouri. Maybe I should move to the state that matches my politics?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yes unironically I do not understand where the confusion comes from
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The confusion comes from the fact that I'm an r-slur who eats lead paint chips.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
redditor detected
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He said paint chips, not soy chips
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
redditor detected opinion rejected
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Until the courts get a Fetal Personhood bill before the SCOTUS, which I would expect to happen June 2023 at the latest.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
but isn't the whole point of the actual judgement that the previous judgement was based on bad logical and legal reasoning? and has nothing in particular to do with the actual political issue itself?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What does that have to do with a bill that would recognize personhood at conception?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
that they likely wouldn't pass any such bill and support it at the supreme court level because again, this judgement states that it's not the supreme courts business, each state can decide it for itself.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But a bill like that doesn't need SCOTUS to support it, they just can't rule it unconstitutional, which they won't. There's widespread support for fetal personhood in red states, and their representatives will probably propose a bill like that once they have control of the legislature, which I expect they'll have in 2023.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ok and? If the majority of voters in red states want this then what's the problem? let them suffer the consequences of their ideas.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No I mean they'll get it passed at the federal level.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
why would they get passed at the federal level? Again, the supreme court said it has nothing to do with it whether pro or against as per my understanding
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They'll get it passed at the federal level because they think a fetus is a person? Because they think allowing abortion to happen anywhere is tantamount to allowing children to be murdered?
And there's nothing the prevent that constitutionally.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I don't give a shit what happens over there
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
hmmm then why reply r-slur
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context