Unable to load image
Reported by:
  • XY : Endlรถsung der Chudenfrage

On the Deuxrama Question :marseydeux:

I am a lurker who's been watching from the sidelines for several months now, but between the Day of the Login Screen, and the Deuxrama issue, I can remain silent no longer, so I am going to use my first post to speak out on this issue.

:chudsey::marseypearlclutch::marseylongpost:

Deuxrama as a separate site is not only a stupid idea, but may in the process ruin rDrama forever. This recent :chudsey: purge has been, to my knowledge, orchestrated to drive people to Deuxrama, and in doing so merely turn rDrama and Deuxrama into two separate bastions of wingcuckery, that will just eternally sneed at each other. Excess CHUDness might get rDrama removed, but I presume :marseydeux: has the same host, and will likely get both sites removed if it gets taken down, so it's pragmatically useless. It also gets unfunny when in excess, and so and the goal is NOT unrestricted :chudsey: or :marseyfreezepeach:, but instead to avoid a division into two wingcuck communities that eternally sneed at each other, and the concept of a separate rDrama-related :chudsey: site. If you want to be a wingcuck, SRD and Kiwifarms exist for that. I can't just sit and watch as this site runs itself into the ground. We must not become /pol/, but we must be careful not to lean into :marseybardfinn: too much. Wingcuckery is a two-sided peril, after all, and Deuxrama was a r-slurred idea from the start.

I propose a balance system for a hypothetical Chud Award/Leftoid Award ratio, wherein say 10:1 - 10 dramanauts chudded for every dramanaut leftoid-awarded, and an excess in one direction will make the opposite award cheaper, subject to rebalancing by Carp and the other admins, e.g. if we get an influx from twitter, this ratio could be flipped on its head, while if this site gets mentioned on /pol/, it could be made 20:1, to maintain a proper wingcuck balance ratio. This could be a better solution to rDrama's political balance problems than creating a chud exile site that brings all the cons of being a chud site to rDrama (deplatforming, chuds finding it a :marseyfreezepeach: place from other chud sites) while also turning rDrama and itself into bastions of wingcuckery. Drama comes from difference, after all. What use to the world is another /pol/, or another SRD?

I also have noticed a sore lack of :chudsey: longposts, and I'm planning on making a few long-winded posts of that style as well - starting with a dissection of the question "What is a Woman?", and why it makes those who believe TRANS LIVES MATTER sneed so much. Plenty of :chudsey:s like to take small potshots in the comments, but I notice few tend to elaborate. I will try to fix that, or shout TRANS LIVES MATTER trying.

And now, finishing this first post, I ask myself the question all lurkers becoming posters must ask ourselves - am I still the lol-milker, or have I become the :marseylolcow:?

92
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Deuxrama is a nonstarter. Just there as a failed attempt to reduce despiteposting, kazakhposting, earlylifeposting, trainposting. If jannies actually wanted to shut it down :marseyshutitdown: it would kill the site because it grew out of reddit going full woketard to begin with. Its getting stale but reddit jannies make it a lot of work to troll for some measly average redditor to aggro :marseynpcmad: and most op ideas are bad and get spoiled by r-slurs and moles in a day.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've been spending a lot more time trolling on Twitter because it's easier and I'm lazy


![](/images/16674454055116708.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Higher barrier to entry nowadays - phone number filter essentially requires you to find a burner or self-dox. There's a reason most of rDrama's ops are on reddit. Wish you luck on your journey making twittercels sneed, though!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The way itโ€™s going I think ๐Ÿš‚posting will become a moderate position. It will be classified as extreme though. Begetting more ๐Ÿš‚ posting.

I hate to say this being pro valid

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Pro :marseytrans2:? Better watch out for my next post, you might enjoy it, you might hate it :marseyshrug:. Also :marseytrain:posting is the default here nowadays, kinda happens when rightoids are driven off into interminable, incomprehensible circlejerks on offsites or evading censors with r-slurred things like "frenposting", while leftoids are super-accessible due to their own censorship - lolcow lefties are easier to find, and that includes :marseytrans2:. I'd link Klenvastergan's post on how it's YOUR duty to find rightoid drama, but I'm too lazy right now.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Increases in ๐Ÿš‚ posting are a reflection of how far the left is willing to go to vote against their own interest and suck the peepee of the capitalists consolidating ownership of the means of production.

Also, youโ€™re r-slurred for thinking there is an agenda targeting you and not an agenda against surrogate /pol/ posting.

Teach me, Iโ€™m unlearned.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's (at least partially) a consequence of the physical location of most of Big Tech - literally in San Francisco, and they make rules, TOSes and so on according to those values. Also, are you a Stupidpol-er?

Also, youโ€™re r-slurred for thinking there is an agenda against you and not an agenda against surrogate /pol/ posting.

When did I say that there was an agenda against me? I'm just making a longpost dissecting the "What is a Woman?" phrase going around recently and thought you might have some critiques of it if you're "pro-valid".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Youโ€™re not wrong but you phrase yourself aggressively. Thatโ€™s annoying.

Idk what your goal is here. To make me a chud as well?

>When did I say that there was an agenda against me?

You didnโ€™t say it directly but I can read between lines.

I am pro trans in that I believe there are many trans individuals who wish to act and exist as a women without infringing upon common lives. Many of these people existed peacefully before ~2015. I wish to continue to offer these people a good life and I donโ€™t blame them for the actions of radical individuals.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Youโ€™re not wrong but you phrase yourself aggressively. Thatโ€™s annoying.

My industry is full of you. Thanks for making sure no meeting ever ends early with your excellent communication skills, cute twink.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyblowkiss:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.