None
28
Is the Media Prepared for an Extinction-Level Event?

...

I've thought a lot about that advice in the past year. A report that tracked layoffs in the industry in 2023 recorded twenty-six hundred and eighty-one in broadcast, print, and digital news media. NBC News, Vox Media, Vice News, Business Insider, Spotify, theSkimm, FiveThirtyEight, The Athletic, and Condé Nast—the publisher of The New Yorker—all made significant layoffs. BuzzFeed News closed, as did Gawker. The Washington Post, which lost about a hundred million dollars last year, offered buyouts to two hundred and forty employees. In just the first month of 2024, Condé Nast laid off a significant number of Pitchfork's staff and folded the outlet into GQ; the Los Angeles Times laid off at least a hundred and fifteen workers (their union called it “the big one”); Time cut fifteen per cent of its union-represented editorial staff; the Wall Street Journal slashed positions at its D.C. bureau; and Sports Illustrated, which had been weathering a scandal for publishing A.I.-generated stories, laid off much of its staff as well. One journ*list recently cancelled a networking phone call with me, writing, “I've decided to officially take my career in a different direction.” There wasn't much I could say to counter that conclusion; it was perfectly logical.

“Publishers, brace yourselves—it's going to be a wild ride,” Matthew Goldstein, a media consultant, wrote in a January newsletter. “I see a potential extinction-level event in the future.” Some of the forces cited by Goldstein were already well known: consumers are burned out by the news, and social-media sites have moved away from promoting news articles. But Goldstein also pointed to Google's rollout of A.I.-integrated search, which answers user queries within the Google interface, rather than referring them to outside Web sites, as a major factor in this coming extinction. According to a recent Wall Street Journal analysis, Google generates close to forty per cent of traffic across digital media. Brands with strong home-page traffic will likely be less affected, Goldstein wrote—places like Yahoo, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, the Daily Mail, CNN, the Washington Post, and Fox News. But Web sites that aren't as frequently typed into browsers need to “contemplate drastic measures, possibly halving their brand portfolios.”

...

:#marseycumplosion:

https://web.archive.org/web/20240210150126/https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-weekend-essay/is-the-media-prepared-for-an-extinction-level-event

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39326486

None
44
Opinion | End useless math requirements - The Washington Post

!math

None
16
Journ*lism schools are failing a generation of students : canada
None
None

:#marseychudgravedance: !chuds !nooticers :#t: :#j: :d#:

NEW YORK (AP) --- On Friday, the National Press Club is offering solace --- and a free meal --- by giving recently laid-off journ*lists tacos in recognition of a brutal stretch that seems to offer bad news daily for an already struggling industry.

For anyone who works in the news media, the list is intimidating --- and unremitting.

The news website The Messenger folded on Wednesday after being in operation since only last May, abruptly putting some 300 journ*lists out of work. The Los Angeles Times laid off more than 100 journ*lists in recent weeks, Business Insider and Time magazine announced staff cuts, Sports Illustrated is struggling to survive, the Washington Post is completing buyouts to more than 200 staffers. The Post reported Thursday that The Wall Street Journal was laying off roughly 20 people in its Washington bureau; there was no immediate comment from a Journal representative. Pitchfork announced it was no longer a freestanding music site, after digital publications BuzzFeed News and Jezebel disappeared last year.

And journ*lists at the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, New York Daily News and the Conde Nast magazine company have all conducted walkouts to protest how management was dealing with business problems.

All this is taking place as the overall jobs outlook in the nation gets stronger. U.S. employers began 2024 by adding 353,000 jobs in January --- a striking spate of hiring. A government report Friday showed that last month's job gain --- roughly twice what economists predicted --- topped the December gain of 333,000.

Not so the news industry. Seeing all the damage is what led to the Washington-based National Press Club to open its weekly Taco Night to laid-off colleagues and offer a one-month free membership to people who need a networking opportunity.

"It's very important when people have lost their jobs to know that they have some support behind them," said Didier Saugy, the club's executive director.

THIS IS NOT A NEW ISSUE

The news business has been in a free fall for the past two decades, starting when much of its advertising moved online to opportunistic tech companies. Advertising is still a huge part of the problem, although there are more complex reasons and circumstances unique to individual outlets that also play a part.

The situation is dire at larger, more national organizations and in smaller communities. A Northwestern University study released in November estimated the United States has lost one-third of its newspapers and two-thirds of its newspaper journ*lism jobs since 2005.

The nation loses 2.5 newspapers per week --- a pace that is accelerating, the study found. Through the end of November, the employment firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas estimated 2,681 journ*lism jobs were lost in 2023, and that tally has increased by hundreds since.

One industry observer, Jeff Jarvis, wondered on his Buzzmachine website this week: "Is it time to give up on old news?"

"There's an inevitability to what is happening," Jarvis, author of "The Gutenberg Parenthesis: The Age of Print and its Lessons for the Age of the Internet," said in an interview. "Publications have been trying to preserve their old ways and their old models, and it is time for them to realize that it's not working and now it's too late."

While there have been some successes in news outlets shifting their business to paid digital subscriptions --- most spectacularly at The New York Times --- failures are much more numerous. Even The Washington Post, whose subscriptions boomed during the Trump administration, has seen a falloff, leading its management to acknowledge that it was too optimistic in expansion plans and needed to cut costs.

Optimism created by billionaire owners at the Post, with Jeff Bezos, and Los Angeles Times, with Patrick Soon-Shiong, has faded as it became apparent they didn't have magic fixes. With COVID and the Hollywood strike constricting the advertising market, the Los Angeles Times estimated it was losing between $30 million and $40 million a year.

Philanthropy has offered a boost to some news organizations, including The Associated Press. The MacArthur Foundation and Knight Foundation last year pledged $500 million to seed solutions in the news industry, but such efforts can't match the scale of the problem, Jarvis said.

"The industry," he said, "leaps from false messiah to false messiah."

Tech companies are also backing away from news, said Aileen Gallagher, a Syracuse University journ*lism professor. Through its AI-powered search generative experience, Google is much less frequently directing users to individual news sites, she said.

Publishers have also complained of losing significant business with Facebook much less frequently featuring news articles that bring people to news sites. Twitter, now X, was once like a second home to journ*lists, but that's become much less the case since Elon Musk's purchase of the site.

"What the news companies may have finally woken up to is that nothing good will come from accepting the scraps that social platforms and search platforms will give the news business," Gallagher said.

The 2020 election proved a boon for many news outlets, but there are questions about whether the public will have as much interest in following political news this year.

THE PATH FORWARD IS JUST AS BUMPY

Some of the troubled outlets also have unique issues that contributed to their problems. Sports Illustrated sent layoff notices to employees after the company that publishes its content lost its license to do so. The Messenger's failure angered observers because its business plan --- a centrist website that tried to appeal to many instead of a tightly-defined audience --- was an uphill battle to start.

"It was business malpractice and human cruelty at an epic scale," Jim VandeHei, co-founder of Axios and Politico, told the Puck newsletter. "Anyone who knew anything about the economics of media knew it would die quickly, spectacularly and sadly."

That sadness is apparent in messages left on social media by laid-off journ*lists from The Messenger and elsewhere.

"I was laid off from my political writing job back in August and haven't been able to find another one since," wrote Tara Dublin, author of "The Sound of Settling: A Rock and Roll Love Story," on X. "I am terrified about the future of journ*lism and how anyone is going to be able to trust any news source."

Steve Reilly, an investigative reporter at The Messenger who saw his job disappear this week, wrote: "If you've been affected by recent journ*lism layoffs at the Messenger or elsewhere, please know that it is not your fault. It has nothing to do with you or your work."

On Thursday, former employees of The Messenger filed a class action lawsuit in U.S. District Court in New York against the company, saying they hadn't been given the required notice of termination.

Jarvis, who also teaches journ*lism, said he doesn't pretend to know the answers. He said there needs to be an attitude change from searching for a way to monetize content to seeing journ*lism as a service to the community.

"We need journ*lists in society, and we will find a way to fill that need," he said. "I'm optimistic in the long run. But in the short run, it's going to be ugly."

None
None
None

:chu#dcheers:

None

How it started: https://web.archive.org/web/20240127182007/https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-wear-hardhat-backwards

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17067529245764728.webp

How it's going:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1706752924728404.webp

Editor's Note: We received a ton of comments in a very short time challenging our assumption that wearing a hard hat "backwards" means wearing it with the bill facing to the rear, and "forwards" means wearing it bill to the front. On the basis of that assumption, we originally rated the claim that Biden was wearing a hard hat backwards as false.

The prevailing counter-argument is that if the suspension of the hat has been purposely configured by its owner such that the bill is worn to the back with the strap and tightening knob under it (as was the case of the hat Biden wore), to wear that hat with the bill facing forward is, practically speaking, to wear it backwards. Therefore, it's argued, it's actually true that, in the photo op discussed below, Biden was wearing it backwards. The strap and tightening knob, which should have been behind Biden's head, were on his forehead.

A corollary to that argument is "Biden looks darn silly in any case."

We find these arguments sound. Therefore, the claim "President Joe Biden wore a hard hat backwards during a photo op with union construction workers in Superior, Wisconsin" is true, and this fact check has been re-rated as such. Thanks to all who argued on behalf of this correction.

!nooticers

None
42
Know the work rules :marseypeterson:
None

Here is the link if you feel like giving them clicks :marseyretardchad:

https://getpocket.com/explore/item/the-right-way-to-pet-a-dog-according-to-veterinarians?utm_source=pocket-newtab-en-us

Thank god we have these articles. I can't wait for the next article where they interview some Urologists to teach me how to bust a nut :marseyeldritchnut:

None

orange websight: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39129367

because when i think quality journ*lism i think sports illustrated

None
70
An analysis of your standard journo

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17063028399249902.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17063028402934349.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1706302840816431.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17063028409718888.webp

None
52
Journo KWeen :taylorlorenzcrying: has spoken on the fall of the MSM. BONUS Glennpai dissecting and sneeding at queen TayLo

!nonchuds is objectivity in journ*lism a bad thing?

https://tiktok.com/@taylorlorenz/video/7327628729058856223

!chuds here is GG's (no Glenpaimarsey :marseyrain: ) video

None
20
:marseysmokealarmbeep: :taylorlorenzcrying: :marse!ysmokealarmbeep:
None
None
104
L.A. Times lays off at least 115 people in the newsroom : LosAngeles :gokulaugh:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17061055426940808.webp

:#marseygarfieldrofl:

orange site

None
Reported by:
  • CREAMY_DOG_ORGASM : What a CUTE TWINK! Also, can you buy me an unban award please?
  • BimothyX2 : Sorry king i spent to much money banning you yesterday I need to cut back
38
:marseybikecuck:
None
78
NYtimes on how the right lost its mind on immigration
None
27
White woman economics brought to you by bloomberg
None

:marseybiden2:

None
61
Sport Illustrated is gone
Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.