!leafs we have our own hole, this is a great day for Canada and therefore the world

What are they complaining about now? pic.twitter.com/cOOHcjt7BB

— Hussein E (@therealhebrahim) May 12, 2024

PEI changed its policies on work permits for foreign students back in 2023, so that less of them would be able to receive permanent residence after getting their useless diplomas. Indians are really mad about it because they have a God-given right to live in YOUR country, chud.

This article talks more about the situation:

Foreign workers in Canada's Prince Edward Island will hold a day-long protest on May 13 against changes in the province's immigration policy that would reduce the intake of permanent residents by 25 per cent. A demonstration was held in Charlottetown on Friday over the issue.

A large number of students from Punjab living in the province are likely to be affected by the policy changes, announced by the province in February, as many of them work either on work permits or as international students. The burden on the healthcare and housing sectors were cited as the reason to reduce the intake. The focus would now be on nominating workers in the healthcare, childcare and construction trades.

“This has left the hundreds of foreign workers working in the retail and services sector hopeless as they are unlikely to get their work permit renewed once it expires. Even if they shift to the healthcare, childcare and construction trades now, they won't get any benefit as work permits in these sectors will be extended only to those who have prior experience,” said Manpreet Kaur Longowal, a volunteer of the Montreal Youth Students Organisation (MYSO).

They also have the commies on their side. It might be over for us, chudbros...

Give Canada to Russia.

‼️ Announcement ‼️

I’m suspending my campaign to become the next federal Conservative candidate & MP for Aurora–Oak Ridges–Richmond Hill.

Sadly, I no longer have faith in the election’s integrity.

Here's why 🧵 pic.twitter.com/sSNS7z7BQX

— Sabrina Maddeaux (@SabrinaMaddeaux) May 9, 2024

Summary of her claims:

>Another candidate had access to the list of current members before anyone else, giving them a significant advantage

>Later, someone using a fake name sent an email slandering her to members of the party, including one of her articles criticizing Stephen Harper, and an article talking about how she painted her kitty with the pride flag

I managed to find the article in question, LMAO. Not exactly slander if it's true. She did say there were some falsehoods in the email, but wouldn't say exactly what they were.

Ex-whore and groomer-sympathizer becomes conservative spokesperson

>A candidate was canvassing the homes that she had already secured funding from, as a means of influencing votes. This was after membership sales had already closed.

>The smear email was also sent to people with a membership in the party

Honestly it does sound like someone was trying to interfere with her campaign unfortunately she doesn't disclose who the suspected candidate is. However, a CBC article on the situation outlined a similar scandal from a year before:

The Conservatives have faced at least two other allegations of party brass favouring one candidate over another in a nomination race.

Last year in Oxford, a riding in southwestern Ontario, Arpan Khanna got the nod over the daughter of the outgoing MP.

That prompted accusations that Khanna, who previously ran in Brampton, Ont. and served as the co-chair of Poilievre's leadership campaign, was a parachute candidate who unfairly displaced a local leader and an anti-abortion campaigner.

Bernier seems to think her campaign was purposefully sabotaged by the CPC due to her stance on mass immigration:

https://twitter.com/MaximeBernier/status/1788593433315004427

>Sexy Indian dude shitlicker party trying to forcefully install pro-jeet candidates

Honestly though, her stance on immigration seems pretty moderate and doesn't seem to deviate that much from that of the CPC's campaign:

The Trudeau regime has introduced an Orwellian new law called the Online Harms Bill C-63, which will give police the power to retroactively search the Internet for ‘hate speech’ violations and arrest offenders, even if the offence occurred before the law existed.
This new bill is… pic.twitter.com/4ROF332xR9

— Camus (@newstart_2024) May 7, 2024

The Trudeau regime has introduced an Orwellian new law called the Online Harms Bill C-63, which will give police the power to retroactively search the Internet for ‘hate speech' violations and arrest offenders, even if the offence occurred before the law existed.

This new bill is aimed at safeguarding the masses from so-called “hate speech.”

https://Revolver.news reports: The real shocker in this bill is the alarming retroactive aspect. Essentially, whatever you've said in the past can now be weaponized against you by today's draconian standards. Historian Dr. Muriel Blaive has weighed in on this draconian law, labeling it outright “mad.” She points out how it literally spits in the face of all Western legal traditions, especially the one about only being punished if you infringed on a law that was valid at the time of committing a crime.

https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/canada-to-imprison-anyone-who-has-ever-posted-hate-speech-online/

It's the conservative parties who keep violating free expression though.

E.g., an Ontario ag-gag law that prevented certain types of whistleblowling that had part of it struck down over free expression last month (edit: paywall free article).

Or Saskatchewan suspending free expression to pass their pronoun law.

Or with Internet legislation, the article mentions a Liberal bill, but the Conservatives are supporting another one that would require providing your identity to access websites with adult content and censoring websites that don't comply with it. That could in theory at least be used to censor a lot of Internet sites, even reddit.

Won't somebody think of the children?!

Most sane people agree that children should not have the same "rights" as everyone else, since they're too stupid to make decisions for themselves. Maybe not Canadians, though...

I'm a free speech absolutist, so I don't want anybody getting arrested, or facing any other legal trouble, based solely on speech. Excepting, of course shouting "fire" and causing a panic; or direct, specific, threats such as "I intend to assassinate [public figure] on [X date]." Anything less than that should be free and clear. The only fears that people should have for expressing an opinion, no matter how controversial, should be private and interpersonal.

I don't know...that quickly hits the issue we are having with Drag Queens.

They are fully within their rights to dress up and entertain...but they feel very threatened to do so by groups standing outside venues harassing them (and it isn't targeted at an individual but at a group they happen to opt into). Do they still have their freedom of expression if they are concerned for their physical well being if they show up at the event?

I think that only the person who actually assaulted somebody should get charged. By the time that we get to adulthood, we're expected to keep our tempers. I suspect that most people have a strong temptation to strike somebody on a daily basis, I certainly do, but we just don't do it. Assaulting somebody is a crime, if you went to trial and said "he called me an N-word, so I hit him", that's probably not going to convince a judge; it might convince a few jurors to commit Jury Nullification and hang the jury, but that's another matter.

Sorry, I did a bit of a double take reading this. Is it actually your intention that "most people" go through their lives with a strong temptation to indulge in physical violence on a daily basis? That's...remarkable.

Whenever I see a redditor's take I get an uncontrollable urge to

!leafs I would take the death penalty instead

Que faut-il de plus pour vous convaincre que ces trois 🤡 racoleurs sont dans le même Parti unique ?

RIEN NE CHANGERA avec Poilievre comme premier ministre. pic.twitter.com/amyPZd30f1

— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) April 29, 2024

>Wait, [insert politician] isn't actually my friend? I thought he was on my side!

Looks like the next five years will be more of the same. I don't really like Bernier as a choice either, he seems to just have controversial takes for the sake of being controversial. He's also Quebecois, and they tend to only care about Quebec to the detriment of the rest of Canada.

!antibharatiya

Winnipeg, he's one of ours

Pour one out for the guy