Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
“Here are 100 sociological studies I read the abstract on. No I don’t know the methodology. I have no idea if they’ve been replicated. You’re just trying to change the topic.”
Imagine a leftist actually looking into a mirror and being able to face himself. I mean now we know where the 40% comes from and the lack of gun ownership
Beuaty is subjective, and people who can find and appraciate the beauty even in the places where it seems the hardest are the real Übermench, they are the happiest and most content people, and we humans should strive to be like them.
It is not. Beauty, outside of trend fashion shit, is a display of both long and short term health.
Women with wider hips are, on average, considered more beautiful for a reason.
Women with less body hair are, on average, considered more beautiful for a reason.
Men with wider shoulders are, on average, considered more beautiful for a reason.
Men with more muscles are, on average, considered more beautiful for a reason.
People with clear skin are, on average, considered more beautiful for a reason.
Strength displays are common in men, fertility displays are common in women. Your method of thought results in shorter, weaker, hormonally imbalanced people.
Beauty is not only skin deep. That's just something we tell children.
POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET |
You have no idea what Übermensch means dumb fuck. Nietzsche explicitly stated that any person of good faith would struggle relentlessly to alter all conditions which they find displeasing. Your advocacy for acceptance of the disgusting is the exact form of sklavenmoral that caused mass existential failure in modern society.
26 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-08-05
Horny ? Chat with fellow doschads in your area! https://www.reddit.com/chat/r/dosrama/channel/169896778_98cd3e6a4e10ac41e2317b7fd2e5466fe28084ac
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
6 CultistHeadpiece 2020-08-05
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
6 ashleychudd 2020-08-05
“Here are 100 sociological studies I read the abstract on. No I don’t know the methodology. I have no idea if they’ve been replicated. You’re just trying to change the topic.”
2 bittercripple6969 2020-08-05
Methodology?
2 kermit_was_wrong 2020-08-05
get a load of this tryhard
1 Tycoronachan 2020-08-05
Big gay
5 Coconuthead93 2020-08-05
Source : dude just trust me
5 collectijism 2020-08-05
Imagine a leftist actually looking into a mirror and being able to face himself. I mean now we know where the 40% comes from and the lack of gun ownership
1 NZVikingRugger 2020-08-05
Imagine what it would be if they did own guns.
1 collectijism 2020-08-05
Let’s be honest here without modern medicine 80% of leftists wouldn’t have even survived into adolescence.
2 cumgangster69 2020-08-05
Execute internet pseuds
1 SnapshillBot 2020-08-05
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 QuadNarca 2020-08-05
Beuaty is subjective, and people who can find and appraciate the beauty even in the places where it seems the hardest are the real Übermench, they are the happiest and most content people, and we humans should strive to be like them.
2 ashleychudd 2020-08-05
Wanna know how I know you’re ugly?
1 [deleted] 2020-08-05
[removed]
1 Its_All_Taken 2020-08-05
It is not. Beauty, outside of trend fashion shit, is a display of both long and short term health.
Women with wider hips are, on average, considered more beautiful for a reason.
Women with less body hair are, on average, considered more beautiful for a reason.
Men with wider shoulders are, on average, considered more beautiful for a reason.
Men with more muscles are, on average, considered more beautiful for a reason.
People with clear skin are, on average, considered more beautiful for a reason.
Strength displays are common in men, fertility displays are common in women. Your method of thought results in shorter, weaker, hormonally imbalanced people.
Beauty is not only skin deep. That's just something we tell children.
2 Al-Farouq-Aminu 2020-08-05
Seriousposting at bait
2 Its_All_Taken 2020-08-05
Shit, I think you're right. Should go outside and question my choices.
1 SpezKilledSwartz2 2020-08-05
POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET | POST FEET |
1 P0TeNTszn 2020-08-05
You have no idea what Übermensch means dumb fuck. Nietzsche explicitly stated that any person of good faith would struggle relentlessly to alter all conditions which they find displeasing. Your advocacy for acceptance of the disgusting is the exact form of sklavenmoral that caused mass existential failure in modern society.
1 theworstever 2020-08-05
Uhh its El Abominacion sweatie.
Learn Spanix maricon.
1 foureyednickfury 2020-08-05
burgers smh
1 reallystupidaltaccou 2020-08-05
Lmao is that Vaush
1 cumgangster69 2020-08-05
Va...Vas...Vau....V-🤮🤮🤮🤢
1 brackenz 2020-08-05
Who?