From what I've gathered, it was 61% of registered voters spread over 10yrs and three elections, so factoring in duplicates, deaths, etc, it's substantially less than everyone in the country.
The article says they were possibly trying to connect real names to reddit accounts, but were probably not very successful due to their semi-anonymity.
Considering the shitposting that goes on here its probably almost impossible to get any meaningful data from all the noise. Somedays I argue with a libertarian others a feminazi and on Tuesdays I'm an antifa.
What I found interesting, since this is entirely in the domain of what I do for a living, just in a different employment sector, is that they are clearly using predictive models to impute things about voters that they don't know for sure through publically available data - things like ethnicity and religious status.
While those aren't hot button PII factors, they're all things that live in the sphere of variables we might call "social determinants" that can be used to predict behavior. They also appear to be geo-locating people, which makes sense from a district examination perspective, but also because that allows them to tie off to Axiom, Equifax and census data to pull in financial, environmental and social factors like poverty, educational attainment, creditworthiness - again all things they can use to impute information about the voter and/or use to characterize the voter to generate probabilities of particular voter behavior.
The public by and large doesn't seem to know all of the data which is available in the public domain, as well as what can be purchased completely legitimately. More and more, industries are employing analytics that tie it all together to provide a complete "picture" of variables on any person that help them predict purchasing, voting, or even health behaviors of that person.
The person-level stuff is honestly not of terrible interest; it's more about how it helps tailor messaging, product development, advertisement delivery, and even product selection for groups of people. You message to the mega-church white upper middle class soccer moms differently than you do to the highly educated urban multi-ethnic and a-religious crowd. Either way, they all see a doctor, they all buy laundry detergent, and they all will engage in the political process at some point if the rationale is compelling enough.
My guess on the data from reddit is that it was being used for sentiment analysis - to really evaluate it meaningfully since it is essentially piles of free text, you'd have to use natural language processing libraries to help organize it into meaningful domains, then you can start to synthesize major positive/negative themes about a candidate, a political process, or other things that aren't politically related.
The subreddits in question range from innocuous to controversial. One was the banned subreddit r/fatpeoplehate, which Gizmodo speculates was picked for its connection to Trump fans — a FiveThirtyEight analysis of r/The_Donald members found that outside explicitly political subreddits, these users overlapped most strongly with r/fatpeoplehate members. But Deep Root also collected information from mountain-biking and Spanish-speaking subreddits, which have no such connection.
Then everything belong to America. People often ask me what it means to be an American. I tell 'em it's triumph. Triumph. Triumph when we nuke our enemies. Triumph when our flag flutters in the wind on the moon. Triumph when we peer down from the moon and laugh heartily at Russia. Triumph when we depose one dictator after another. Triumph when we break into the homes of terrorist kingpins on the other side of Earth and shoot them in the face. Triumph when we use flying robots to bomb other terrorists in Afghanistan. Triumph when we were the main reason the Nazis were defeated in WWII. Triumph when we freed Europe twice. Triumph. Triumph. Triumph. But it's not just the the big things, see? It's the way I can set up lawn chairs at my friends house on the Texas Rio Grande and share a toast to freedom while watching Mexicans charge into gunfire to enter my country. It's the way an Italian cabbie sits up straight and floors the gas when he hears my accent. It's seeing the wide eyes and bead of sweat running down the forehead of a German customs agent when he opens my passport. It's the way a French waiter hangs his head when I refuse the wine and ask for Coke instead, in English knowing full well he understands me (and that they have it). The way an Aussie blushes and leans into the urinal next to me in the bathroom, or the scowl that meets my smirk when I tip an English waiter in US dollars covered with Washington's face. The way small mobs of Canadian school children follow me from a distance to see what a free man looks like, or how heads timidly rise and women gather when my accent stops the music in the clubs of Amsterdam. Triumph. Every bit of it, triumph. That's what it means to be an American.
No you didn't. There is literally no way to pretend Trump is a win. If you believed in what Trump said then congratulations George Soros' Jewish business partner is the most powerful person in the country. If you wanted a Republican, congratulations you managed to get the one who's so incompetent that even with both houses, he can't pass legislation.
apparently tried to dox retards from r/fatpeoplehate and other subs
why would they dox their support base. the "reddit folder" has nothing to do with the other voter leaks. they were probably crunching the data to analyze what appealed their support base. besides, there's nothing to "leak" in that reddit files. all of it is easily accessible (including fatpeoplehate before they banned) and is publicly available on github, in fact I think they copied the github files and hosted them in a web server and didn't care to secure it because why would they have to?
So you would prefer that it was kept secret who is registered to vote? Your link doesn't even mention anything about Bernie and who one votes for is never tied to voter rolls; all that's kept on file is things like age, party affiliation, name, address and if you cast a ballot in any recent elections
Looks like you summoned a bot account! Check its profile. I wonder what the goal is of someone spending money on server time running botnets with bots like this.
I've seen too many bot accounts like this with a years old account and months between comments to think this is an alt. there isn't even a purpose to use a secret alt to make an innocuous comment like that anyway. bot account it is. I predict they'll delete the account and all comments since we're discussing it like when it happened to one of my posts here in /r/drama of all places. they don't like attention like that, generally.
Voter rolls can't be "leaked" as they're publicly available (but people don't seem to realize this which is why the original story is sitting on top of /r/news right now)
This story is actually about the fact that Deep Root also seemed to be keeping tabs on Reddit users, which, again, is neither nefarious nor surprising in this age of data-analytics
Then why would the RNC pay $6.7 million for the data? And why would the Koch brothers pay to swap data? This data is conveniently collected in one place and would be nearly impossible for an individual to compile on their own.
Im curious, do you have a good argument as to why a data compilation as large as this is negligible compared to going to every county in the country and collecting the data manually from clerks? Or trying to find the info by going to 3000+ county websites, all for free?
they were apparently trying to connect real names to reddit profiles.
...as guessed as plausible by the clearly knowledgeable researcher who published it. there's nothing to show how he even arrived at that conclusion. apart from the minisclule number of retards who revealed PI or the location they live in, what can that "analysis" even reveal? I understand analyzing facebook data like this, but on reddit I don't see the value in spending money trying to link a dozen retards to their real name.
how does this prove that they were "trying to connect real names to reddit profiles"? it's a political data analytics firm that had reddit data on political subreddits.
Oh, well, since you don't see it it must not be there!
Top minds.
no reason to be ass blasted mate! I really don't see the value in it. with facebook data, you know for sure you can link names with political affiliations and interests. on reddit, the APIs don't reveal the ip addresses or email accounts associated with accounts (which are the only personally identifiable information reddit itself has). the whole point of reddit is to share your thoughts without revealing your name and contact details. so apart from a few retards who reveal it, there's no way to connect a majority of reddit accounts to real names. since you think trying this is worth all the infrastructure costs, employee time and overheads to "dox" a few retards on reddit is justifiable, enlighten me why.
how does this prove that they were "trying to connect real names to reddit profiles"?
No one said it "proves" anything. I specifically said apparently tried to dox. Because that's all the article is saying.
since you think it is worthwhile spending money on all the infrastructure costs, employee time and overheads to "dox" a few retards on reddit, enlighten me why.
And, again, the apparent attempt to connect reddit data with personal data is not nothing, considering the reddit data was 170GB (out of the total 1.1 TB leaked). So they apparently did find it worthwhile. Maybe ask them?
I do find it strange tho how passionately you're defending them tbh. No reason to be ass blasted mate! (:
nobody is doubting that political data analysis firms analyse reddit data.
I disagreed with this comment of yours
they were apparently trying to connect real names to reddit profiles
lol you tried to defend it by calling me a "top mind" and now you're focussing on "not ackshually believing it but apparently they might have done it".
I do find it strange though how passionately you're defending them tbh. No reason to be ass blasted mate! (:
That's what the article implied. Hence "apparently".
lol you tried to defend it by calling me a "top mind" and now you're focussing on "not ackshually believing it but apparently they might have done it".
Where did I try to defend anything? That was what the article said. I didn't write it. I was just saying that I don't consider you a more credible source. Because of, you know, the whole general retardation thing you struggle with.
And you clearly don't understand irony, so yep, top mind indeed.
I was just saying that I don't consider you to be a more credible source on any of it.
I didn't claim to be the source of anything. Try again.
I just disagreed with you and asked for evidence that the analytics company tried to connect real names to reddit accounts because that is basically impossible to do for any reasonable number is users without hacking reddit servers.. you couldn't and now you're backtracking claiming that you never believed the article anyway and you were just an innocent messenger quoting what the author said. no.
you couldn't and now you're backtracking claiming that you never believed the article anyway and you were just an innocent messenger quoting what the author said.
Who's backtracking lol? I never said I believed anything. That's just literally what the article said.
Who's hostile? They don't even know if it was actually downloaded, it was found by someone who's work is finding unsecured shit. I'm just not really bothered.
Again, no one said you have to be bothered. It isn't about you, weirdo.
Look, I know many of you illegal T_D immigrants haven't fully assimilated into r/drama culture yet, but exaggeration kinda our thing and protected by our Constitution.
If everyone is exposed no one is exposed. What am I suppose to be worried about exactly? I'm rich and white, but need to work 5 days a week for a living to maintain it, so by default I'm a republican gun owner who voted Trump. You don't need a leak to figure that out.
I know someone who is heavily involved in computer security who hates that she is the only one in the US with her exact name, so she's easy to google. She grew up in the USSR so shes a bit rightfully paranoid about the government.
Side note, she switched from hard left leaner to voting Republican with Obama being his campaign used the same kind of imagery she grew up with in the Soviet Union. I haven't talked to her in about 6 years now, I wonder how she feels now that his abuse of the NSA is coming to light.
124 comments
n/a SnapshillBot 2017-06-19
This is why we need mayocide.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
n/a dealin_roofies 2017-06-19
Am I reading this incorrectly, or is this publicly-available data?
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
Probably, but
piqued my interest
n/a Ultrashitpost 2017-06-19
That's almost everyone eligible to vote. They were gathering info on practically everyone in the country.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
From what I've gathered, it was 61% of registered voters spread over 10yrs and three elections, so factoring in duplicates, deaths, etc, it's substantially less than everyone in the country.
n/a Ultrashitpost 2017-06-19
oh i see. I still don't get how that's supposedly legal and where they got the info from that connected Facebook to reddit.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
The article says they were possibly trying to connect real names to reddit accounts, but were probably not very successful due to their semi-anonymity.
n/a cleverseneca 2017-06-19
Considering the shitposting that goes on here its probably almost impossible to get any meaningful data from all the noise. Somedays I argue with a libertarian others a feminazi and on Tuesdays I'm an antifa.
n/a SpotNL 2017-06-19
Your profile would say you are on the spectrum then.
n/a cleverseneca 2017-06-19
I post here don't I?
n/a SpotNL 2017-06-19
I mean it in a "more than avarage" way. Even in this sea of autists, you stand out.
n/a cleverseneca 2017-06-19
Mommy always said I was exceptional!
n/a SpotNL 2017-06-19
Mine said I was a mistake.
n/a IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-06-19
DING DING DING
n/a out_stealing_horses 2017-06-19
It's publically available data.
What I found interesting, since this is entirely in the domain of what I do for a living, just in a different employment sector, is that they are clearly using predictive models to impute things about voters that they don't know for sure through publically available data - things like ethnicity and religious status.
While those aren't hot button PII factors, they're all things that live in the sphere of variables we might call "social determinants" that can be used to predict behavior. They also appear to be geo-locating people, which makes sense from a district examination perspective, but also because that allows them to tie off to Axiom, Equifax and census data to pull in financial, environmental and social factors like poverty, educational attainment, creditworthiness - again all things they can use to impute information about the voter and/or use to characterize the voter to generate probabilities of particular voter behavior.
The public by and large doesn't seem to know all of the data which is available in the public domain, as well as what can be purchased completely legitimately. More and more, industries are employing analytics that tie it all together to provide a complete "picture" of variables on any person that help them predict purchasing, voting, or even health behaviors of that person.
The person-level stuff is honestly not of terrible interest; it's more about how it helps tailor messaging, product development, advertisement delivery, and even product selection for groups of people. You message to the mega-church white upper middle class soccer moms differently than you do to the highly educated urban multi-ethnic and a-religious crowd. Either way, they all see a doctor, they all buy laundry detergent, and they all will engage in the political process at some point if the rationale is compelling enough.
My guess on the data from reddit is that it was being used for sentiment analysis - to really evaluate it meaningfully since it is essentially piles of free text, you'd have to use natural language processing libraries to help organize it into meaningful domains, then you can start to synthesize major positive/negative themes about a candidate, a political process, or other things that aren't politically related.
n/a Ultrashitpost 2017-06-19
So T_D really does hate Americans
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
Just the fat ones. Donny better hit the slim fast.
n/a Ultrashitpost 2017-06-19
The joke is that all americans are fat
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
25% of us are still fighting the fight.
n/a SlavophilesAnonymous 2017-06-19
They're skinnyfat.
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
Some but Euros got us beat there.
n/a jubbergun 2017-06-19
I'm not fat. I'm big-boned.
n/a purplepilled3 2017-06-19
Mexicans actually have the highest obesity rates ;)
n/a Ultrashitpost 2017-06-19
I thought it was Australia?
n/a _narrows 2017-06-19
Got that block body on lock
n/a Wraith_GraveSpell 2017-06-19
Technically there's a Polynesian island that has the record so far. But they don't matter.
n/a TSwizzlesNipples 2017-06-19
American Samoa?
n/a Stuntman119 2017-06-19
The fuck is a polynesium and does it have oil
n/a Chin_Up_Chick 2017-06-19
That's racist
n/a PM_ME_HAIRLESS_CATS 2017-06-19
T_D could be convinced to hate Donny and they would do it.
n/a grungebot5000 2017-06-19
what how
n/a Stuntman119 2017-06-19
You can't just say shit like this and not tell us how.
n/a Cloacalla_Festival 2017-06-19
We are just trying to Make America Great Again, fam.
n/a Sarge_Ward 2017-06-19
doesn't it have to be "great" a first time to be "great again?" or like even anything a little bit better than below average a first time?
n/a CIRCLONT6 2017-06-19
america is far and away the best country on earth
n/a Sarge_Ward 2017-06-19
did you just post this unironically?
n/a CIRCLONT6 2017-06-19
unironically no
n/a SocialJusticeYamcha 2017-06-19
Then everything belong to America. People often ask me what it means to be an American. I tell 'em it's triumph. Triumph. Triumph when we nuke our enemies. Triumph when our flag flutters in the wind on the moon. Triumph when we peer down from the moon and laugh heartily at Russia. Triumph when we depose one dictator after another. Triumph when we break into the homes of terrorist kingpins on the other side of Earth and shoot them in the face. Triumph when we use flying robots to bomb other terrorists in Afghanistan. Triumph when we were the main reason the Nazis were defeated in WWII. Triumph when we freed Europe twice. Triumph. Triumph. Triumph. But it's not just the the big things, see? It's the way I can set up lawn chairs at my friends house on the Texas Rio Grande and share a toast to freedom while watching Mexicans charge into gunfire to enter my country. It's the way an Italian cabbie sits up straight and floors the gas when he hears my accent. It's seeing the wide eyes and bead of sweat running down the forehead of a German customs agent when he opens my passport. It's the way a French waiter hangs his head when I refuse the wine and ask for Coke instead, in English knowing full well he understands me (and that they have it). The way an Aussie blushes and leans into the urinal next to me in the bathroom, or the scowl that meets my smirk when I tip an English waiter in US dollars covered with Washington's face. The way small mobs of Canadian school children follow me from a distance to see what a free man looks like, or how heads timidly rise and women gather when my accent stops the music in the clubs of Amsterdam. Triumph. Every bit of it, triumph. That's what it means to be an American.
n/a Cloacalla_Festival 2017-06-19
Unironically this. :-D
n/a Chin_Up_Chick 2017-06-19
Whats the best country on earth then
n/a CIRCLONT6 2017-06-19
n/a Hemingwavy 2017-06-19
Can you imagine being so stupid you thought Trump was the person to do that?
n/a Cloacalla_Festival 2017-06-19
I voted for the winning side in 1992, 1996, 2008, 2012, 2016 and 2020.
n/a HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-06-19
I see you didn't like Bush
n/a jubbergun 2017-06-19
Based on primary votes I think you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who did. Even people who enjoy guac were voting against him.
n/a allwordsaredust 2017-06-19
Congrats on reliably being part of the majority?
n/a Cloacalla_Festival 2017-06-19
Thank you!
n/a Hemingwavy 2017-06-19
No you didn't. There is literally no way to pretend Trump is a win. If you believed in what Trump said then congratulations George Soros' Jewish business partner is the most powerful person in the country. If you wanted a Republican, congratulations you managed to get the one who's so incompetent that even with both houses, he can't pass legislation.
n/a PedanticFascistNazi 2017-06-19
Wait, so you voted Hillary? Or do you mean you voted for the winning delegates that voted for us?
n/a Cloacalla_Festival 2017-06-19
what
n/a flipkt 2017-06-19
why would they dox their support base. the "reddit folder" has nothing to do with the other voter leaks. they were probably crunching the data to analyze what appealed their support base. besides, there's nothing to "leak" in that reddit files. all of it is easily accessible (including fatpeoplehate before they banned) and is publicly available on github, in fact I think they copied the github files and hosted them in a web server and didn't care to secure it because why would they have to?
n/a CucksLoveTrump 2017-06-19
The whole thing is a nonstory. Voter rolls are public information
n/a Vote_Democrat 2017-06-19
Which is an absolute disgrace.
Over 125,000 people in NYC alone were purged from the voter rolls when it became known that they would vote for Bernie.
n/a CucksLoveTrump 2017-06-19
So you would prefer that it was kept secret who is registered to vote? Your link doesn't even mention anything about Bernie and who one votes for is never tied to voter rolls; all that's kept on file is things like age, party affiliation, name, address and if you cast a ballot in any recent elections
n/a flipkt 2017-06-19
Looks like you summoned a bot account! Check its profile. I wonder what the goal is of someone spending money on server time running botnets with bots like this.
n/a CucksLoveTrump 2017-06-19
/u/Vote_Democrat is just a dirty SRDine unfortunately
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
There is a difference?
n/a flipkt 2017-06-19
how do you know that? they delete their comments regularly or is it a known alt?
n/a CucksLoveTrump 2017-06-19
i just clicked on the profile, and on the first page was SRD but it was like a year ago. I didn't even notice
n/a flipkt 2017-06-19
I've seen too many bot accounts like this with a years old account and months between comments to think this is an alt. there isn't even a purpose to use a secret alt to make an innocuous comment like that anyway. bot account it is. I predict they'll delete the account and all comments since we're discussing it like when it happened to one of my posts here in /r/drama of all places. they don't like attention like that, generally.
n/a flipkt 2017-06-19
those 125000 should have been purged in real life too imho.
n/a [deleted] 2017-06-19
[removed]
n/a IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-06-19
That'll take a lot of helicopters
n/a scatmunchies 2017-06-19
I like that you linked an article that doesn't support your contention at all. Retarded, just like Bernie.
n/a flipkt 2017-06-19
so, only the voter rolls were "leaked"? a "researcher" discovered public data in a server and published it? why is this even a story to begin with?
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
No. It was 61% of the population, not just registered voters.
n/a CucksLoveTrump 2017-06-19
Voter rolls can't be "leaked" as they're publicly available (but people don't seem to realize this which is why the original story is sitting on top of /r/news right now)
This story is actually about the fact that Deep Root also seemed to be keeping tabs on Reddit users, which, again, is neither nefarious nor surprising in this age of data-analytics
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
Wasn't just voter rolls:
n/a CucksLoveTrump 2017-06-19
Alright, but it's all publically available information
n/a Teresa_May 2017-06-19
Doxing is generally done using publicly available information too.
n/a CucksLoveTrump 2017-06-19
But that's because people use their anonymous accounts and link them to their PII like dumbasses
n/a PedanticFascistNazi 2017-06-19
Then why would the RNC pay $6.7 million for the data? And why would the Koch brothers pay to swap data? This data is conveniently collected in one place and would be nearly impossible for an individual to compile on their own.
Im curious, do you have a good argument as to why a data compilation as large as this is negligible compared to going to every county in the country and collecting the data manually from clerks? Or trying to find the info by going to 3000+ county websites, all for free?
What am I missing?
n/a CucksLoveTrump 2017-06-19
it's a nonstory from a "privacy" standpoint.
if I paid man-hours to get people to compile this and then it got leaked, I'd be pissed, but that's literally the only people it should matter to.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
The reddit part of the story is that they were apparently trying to connect real names to reddit profiles.
n/a flipkt 2017-06-19
...as guessed as plausible by the clearly knowledgeable researcher who published it. there's nothing to show how he even arrived at that conclusion. apart from the minisclule number of retards who revealed PI or the location they live in, what can that "analysis" even reveal? I understand analyzing facebook data like this, but on reddit I don't see the value in spending money trying to link a dozen retards to their real name.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
lol one of the folders was titled "reddit"
Oh, well, since you don't see it it must not be there!
Top minds.
n/a flipkt 2017-06-19
how does this prove that they were "trying to connect real names to reddit profiles"? it's a political data analytics firm that had reddit data on political subreddits.
no reason to be ass blasted mate! I really don't see the value in it. with facebook data, you know for sure you can link names with political affiliations and interests. on reddit, the APIs don't reveal the ip addresses or email accounts associated with accounts (which are the only personally identifiable information reddit itself has). the whole point of reddit is to share your thoughts without revealing your name and contact details. so apart from a few retards who reveal it, there's no way to connect a majority of reddit accounts to real names. since you think trying this is worth all the infrastructure costs, employee time and overheads to "dox" a few retards on reddit is justifiable, enlighten me why.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
No one said it "proves" anything. I specifically said apparently tried to dox. Because that's all the article is saying.
That's why.
And, again, the apparent attempt to connect reddit data with personal data is not nothing, considering the reddit data was 170GB (out of the total 1.1 TB leaked). So they apparently did find it worthwhile. Maybe ask them?
I do find it strange tho how passionately you're defending them tbh. No reason to be ass blasted mate! (:
n/a flipkt 2017-06-19
nobody is doubting that political data analysis firms analyse reddit data.
I disagreed with this comment of yours
lol you tried to defend it by calling me a "top mind" and now you're focussing on "not ackshually believing it but apparently they might have done it".
oh, the irony!
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
That's what the article implied. Hence "apparently".
Where did I try to defend anything? That was what the article said. I didn't write it. I was just saying that I don't consider you a more credible source. Because of, you know, the whole general retardation thing you struggle with.
And you clearly don't understand irony, so yep, top mind indeed.
n/a flipkt 2017-06-19
I didn't claim to be the source of anything. Try again.
I just disagreed with you and asked for evidence that the analytics company tried to connect real names to reddit accounts because that is basically impossible to do for any reasonable number is users without hacking reddit servers.. you couldn't and now you're backtracking claiming that you never believed the article anyway and you were just an innocent messenger quoting what the author said. no.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
Who's backtracking lol? I never said I believed anything. That's just literally what the article said.
Try again, little one.
n/a flipkt 2017-06-19
haha. feel smug calling me names all you want, you were wrong and had to accept it in a roundabout way eventually.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
What was i wrong about?
n/a flipkt 2017-06-19
boring. fuck off
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
No, seriously, what was I wrong about? You keep saying that as though I was trying to be right about something.
I think you're a bit confused, little one.
n/a Namenamenamenamena 2017-06-19
Lol you're retarded
n/a cleverseneca 2017-06-19
Besides, monitoring /r/drama to get a good sociological study on weaponized autism.
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
My real name is Chico Cup so I could see how that would work.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
no one is saying t worked you mong, just that they apparently tried
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
So, nothing?
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
Why are you so hostile over this? I didn't write the article or leak 1.1TB of data lol
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
Who's hostile? They don't even know if it was actually downloaded, it was found by someone who's work is finding unsecured shit. I'm just not really bothered.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
Again, no one said you have to be bothered. It isn't about you, weirdo.
Look, I know many of you illegal T_D immigrants haven't fully assimilated into r/drama culture yet, but exaggeration kinda our thing and protected by our Constitution.
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
I've been here before TD was a thing.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
Then you should know better. Now I'm doubly disappointed.
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
Sorry I just don't see the REEES. I'm a Trump fanboi but I'm perfectly happy to call out the Donald REEES cause they have had some good ones.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
lol ok
n/a Prince_Kropotkin 2017-06-19
Don't call it a comeback, I've been an idiot for years
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
I am sitting in bed reading this reply and something struck me.
I should probably manscape my calves. They are getting rather hairy.
n/a Namenamenamenamena 2017-06-19
There it is. The good ole "I was just pretending to be retarded."
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
I never pretend.
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
Oh.. "the verge"...
Nothing to see here.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
Would you prefer The Hill?:
But sure, nothing at all to see here lol
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
If everyone is exposed no one is exposed. What am I suppose to be worried about exactly? I'm rich and white, but need to work 5 days a week for a living to maintain it, so by default I'm a republican gun owner who voted Trump. You don't need a leak to figure that out.
n/a CucksLoveTrump 2017-06-19
you know what they say: safety through obscurity
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
I know someone who is heavily involved in computer security who hates that she is the only one in the US with her exact name, so she's easy to google. She grew up in the USSR so shes a bit rightfully paranoid about the government.
Side note, she switched from hard left leaner to voting Republican with Obama being his campaign used the same kind of imagery she grew up with in the Soviet Union. I haven't talked to her in about 6 years now, I wonder how she feels now that his abuse of the NSA is coming to light.
n/a hereandnowhehe 2017-06-19
Huh?
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
Who said you were?
n/a Chicup 2017-06-19
What the drama though? You need people REEEEEEEEEEing
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
You and others ITT have taken care of that part. (:
n/a The_Reason_Trump_Won 2017-06-19
You're reeeeeing more than anyone in this thread tbqh
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
ftfy bb
n/a The_Reason_Trump_Won 2017-06-19
I don't get it
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
^ literally the reason trump won
n/a The_Reason_Trump_Won 2017-06-19
Don't you put that evil on me
n/a PM_ME_HAIRLESS_CATS 2017-06-19
"mommy what's a regex?"
n/a WalterMatthau 2017-06-19
Proper use of tenses, for one. Seriousposting on /r/drama is a close second tho.
n/a Cloacalla_Festival 2017-06-19
No, not really.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
Too bad.
Just because they don't suck your daddy's dick doesn't make them a bad source, despite what your caretakers say.
n/a Cloacalla_Festival 2017-06-19
It does make them anti-American cucks, though, which makes them a bad source.
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
and the funniest part is that you actually literally unironically believe that
el em ay oh
n/a Cloacalla_Festival 2017-06-19
👍🏾
n/a poopy_ass 2017-06-19
Downvoted
n/a HAHApointsatyou 2017-06-19
D: